On Tuesday 28 June 2011 19:41:36 Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> Interesting... It is difficult to find this topic using "Search." It
> is shown at the 5th page of 478 pages of results. Yeah, it could be
> worse, but frankly, who looks at more than three pages of results?
I just google search kde 4.6.4 s
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Jan Steffens wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Thomas Dziedzic
> wrote:
> > The only program that doesn't work with Java 7 afaik is minecraft, the
> > specific problem can be tracked here:
> >
> http://getsatisfaction.com/mojang/topics/minecraft_doesnt_wo
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> The only program that doesn't work with Java 7 afaik is minecraft, the
> specific problem can be tracked here:
> http://getsatisfaction.com/mojang/topics/minecraft_doesnt_work_with_java_7
> Hopefully we can have enough users complaining th
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Java 7 is getting released on July 28th so I thought it would be a good time
> to let users test it out.
> I have just pushed jre/jdk 7 build 147 into [community-testing] so that
> users can have a month in advance to report bugs, a
Hi,
Java 7 is getting released on July 28th so I thought it would be a good time
to let users test it out.
I have just pushed jre/jdk 7 build 147 into [community-testing] so that
users can have a month in advance to report bugs, and notify upstream
projects if they are incompatible with java 7.
Yo
On 28 June 2011 19:32, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 June 2011 19:28:00 Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
>> Thanks, that explains everything. I was searching the forums, but I
>> didn't even considered looking at the topic "[kde-unstable] KDE 4.7"
> There is a topic in [testing] Repo Forum too:
> h
On Tuesday 28 June 2011 19:28:00 Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> Thanks, that explains everything. I was searching the forums, but I
> didn't even considered looking at the topic "[kde-unstable] KDE 4.7"
There is a topic in [testing] Repo Forum too:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=121446
--
A
On 28 June 2011 17:12, Bogdan Ionuț wrote:
> 2011/6/28 Lukáš Jirkovský
>
>> Hello,
>> I'd like to ask what is keeping KDE 4.6.4 from moving to [extra]? I'm
>> using it for some time without any problems, neither I can find any
>> bug report specific for 4.6.4
>>
>> Have a nice day,
>> Lukas
>>
>
2011/6/28 Lukáš Jirkovský
> Hello,
> I'd like to ask what is keeping KDE 4.6.4 from moving to [extra]? I'm
> using it for some time without any problems, neither I can find any
> bug report specific for 4.6.4
>
> Have a nice day,
> Lukas
>
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=952517#p9525
Hello,
I'd like to ask what is keeping KDE 4.6.4 from moving to [extra]? I'm
using it for some time without any problems, neither I can find any
bug report specific for 4.6.4
Have a nice day,
Lukas
On 06/28/2011 05:07 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Just FYI,
This may be my fault, but on each box I have updated, I get the
following error:
(13/13) checking for file conflicts
[###] 100%
error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
python2-zope-inter
Just FYI,
This may be my fault, but on each box I have updated, I get the following
error:
(13/13) checking for file conflicts
[###] 100%
error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
python2-zope-interface:
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/zo
On 06/27/2011 03:10 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Upstream update, please sign off.
responding on the general list:
Signoff - both (2-x86_64, 4-x86)
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
I'm in the situation where some of the information that I really would
like to have in the pkgver/pkgrel isn't available until after the
build step. Also, some information about the dependencies is clearly
much easier to extract during the build process (due to the tools I
have available to me).
14 matches
Mail list logo
