Yes I am also curious about this, systemd (which I've been using for some
time) would
appear to be the ideal solution to this.
However I find the interface for controlling daemons etc
(using commands like `sudo systemctl restart openntpd.service') to be
somewhat clunky.
Maybe someone knows of a m
Welcome Dave! (aka FalconIndy)
Reisner's contributions and community involvement have been outstanding.
I'm very pleased to see that he has decided to join the development team.
-- Evan LeCompte
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 07:56:25 PM Bernar
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 07:56:25 PM Bernardo Barros wrote:
> here too :-)
+700 on this.
here too :-)
n Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
>>
>>
>> I also agree with this, but I wanted to avoid saying it lest we get into
>> another debate about systemd on here. But yes, systemd does seem to go
>> against
>> the grain of the UNIX Philosophy and the Arch Way.
>>
>
> I agree, no need
>
>
> I also agree with this, but I wanted to avoid saying it lest we get into
> another debate about systemd on here. But yes, systemd does seem to go
> against
> the grain of the UNIX Philosophy and the Arch Way.
>
I agree, no need to flame, we have flamed before on this :)
In the end, I trust
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 06:08:03 PM Thomas S Hatch wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> > On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 05:33:50 PM Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
> > > > Please welcome Dave to our development team. He has been a f
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 05:33:50 PM Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
> > > Please welcome Dave to our development team. He has been a frequent
> > > contributor (and reviewer of patches!) to Pacman, has
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 05:33:50 PM Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
> > Please welcome Dave to our development team. He has been a frequent
> > contributor (and reviewer of patches!) to Pacman, has been a TU for a
> > little bit, and has taken initiative on a
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Bernardo Barros
wrote:
> 2011/6/21 Oon-Ee Ng :
>>
>> Systemd to come? =)
>>
>
> kernel-lts 2.6.32 is compatible with systemd anyway?
>
Nope (from my own experience with a custom 2.6.33 kernel).
For clarification (which I think everyone understands, but still) I
wa
On 06/21/2011 04:33 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
>> Please welcome Dave to our development team. He has been a frequent
>> contributor (and reviewer of patches!) to Pacman, has been a TU for a
>> little bit, and has taken initiative on a lot of
>> initsc
2011/6/21 Oon-Ee Ng :
>
> Systemd to come? =)
>
kernel-lts 2.6.32 is compatible with systemd anyway?
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
> Please welcome Dave to our development team. He has been a frequent
> contributor (and reviewer of patches!) to Pacman, has been a TU for a
> little bit, and has taken initiative on a lot of
> initscripts/mkinitcpio/systemd type stuff. I think I'
Hi Arch community,
Arch Linux (archboot creation tool) 2011.06-1, "2k11-R3" has been released.
To avoid confusion, this is not an official arch linux iso release!
Homepage and for more information on archboot:
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Archboot
Forum:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopi
14 matches
Mail list logo
