On 05/25/2011 07:31 PM, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
Hi all,
the first beta of the new major release of KDE 4.7 is out and is already
packaged in [kde-unstable].
That was quick! Works awesome here, in fact, a few of the quirks I
experienced got fixed.
Good job!
-- Sven-Hendrik
On 05/26/2011 07:28 AM, XeCycle wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:20:46PM -0300, Bernardo Barros wrote:
Perhaps we may provide alternative kernels? With names like
these, we may get a brand new project named "Arch Operating
System", providing Linux, BSD, Hurd or even more as kernels,
and users ar
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:20:46PM -0300, Bernardo Barros wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> There are rumors that the next version number of the Linux Kernel is
> going to be 3.0.
> Since we choosed 'kernel26' as the package name, we will have to
> modify it anyway.
> Why not just 'linux 3.0'? Just an idea..
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 05:33:42PM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> This is a non-issue. The package name was wrong all along, so why not
> let it remain wrong?
Why was the package named as it was? What were the reasons given when
it was created? I've wondered this in the past, especially since othe
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 22:03, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Upstream update. This package is NOT in testing (2.6.39 currently
> resides there), but at:
> http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/kernel26/
>
> please signoff for both arches.
>
> greetings
> tpowa
> --
> Tobias Powalowski
> Archlinux Develope
On 26 May 2011 03:28, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> i know this topic is pretty much the definition of "bikeshed" ... but
> i agree with the "linux" package ... i don't recall ever writing
> `pacman -S sound` or `pacman -S make-my-monitors-have-a-gui-thingy`
> :-D
You are correct, bikeshed it is, a
2011/5/25 Ray Rashif
> On 26 May 2011 03:15, Mauro Santos wrote:
> > On 25-05-2011 19:36, Ray Rashif wrote:
> >
> >> I agree. I'd like for the package to be called simply 'kernel'. That
> >> fits in with our straightforward approach to package-naming (and
> >> packaging in general). As long as w
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:09 PM, cantabile wrote:
> On 05/25/2011 09:36 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:
>>
>> On 25 May 2011 23:38, Heiko Baums wrote:
>>>
>>> Linux3.0 can easily cause misunderstandings as Linux is usually used as
>>> a generic term for the whole system, the distros, etc. even if the
>>> c
On 26 May 2011 03:15, Mauro Santos wrote:
> On 25-05-2011 19:36, Ray Rashif wrote:
>
>> I agree. I'd like for the package to be called simply 'kernel'. That
>> fits in with our straightforward approach to package-naming (and
>> packaging in general). As long as we can linguistically correlate the
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:09 PM, cantabile wrote:
> On 05/25/2011 09:36 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:
>
>> On 25 May 2011 23:38, Heiko Baums wrote:
>>
>>> Linux3.0 can easily cause misunderstandings as Linux is usually used as
>>> a generic term for the whole system, the distros, etc. even if the
>>> co
On 25-05-2011 19:36, Ray Rashif wrote:
> I agree. I'd like for the package to be called simply 'kernel'. That
> fits in with our straightforward approach to package-naming (and
> packaging in general). As long as we can linguistically correlate the
> commands, for .eg:
>
> "I want a kernel for th
On 05/25/2011 09:36 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:
On 25 May 2011 23:38, Heiko Baums wrote:
Linux3.0 can easily cause misunderstandings as Linux is usually used as
a generic term for the whole system, the distros, etc. even if the
correct naming of the whole system is GNU/Linux and Linux itself
actually
On 25 May 2011 23:38, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Linux3.0 can easily cause misunderstandings as Linux is usually used as
> a generic term for the whole system, the distros, etc. even if the
> correct naming of the whole system is GNU/Linux and Linux itself
> actually is only the kernel.
I agree. I'd li
Hi all,
the first beta of the new major release of KDE 4.7 is out and is already
packaged in [kde-unstable].
As you already know KDE is (slowly) moving to GIT; with this transition some
KDE module has been splitted into subprojects, others modules will be splitted
during this beta cycle and oth
Am 25.05.2011 18:21, schrieb Yaro Kasear:
> On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 11:14:55 Sander Jansen wrote:
>> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Thomas Bächler
> wrote:
>>> Am 25.05.2011 17:43, schrieb jesse jaara:
This is from recent kerbel mailing list post. A voice inside Torvals
head is te
On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 11:14:55 Sander Jansen wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Thomas Bächler
wrote:
> > Am 25.05.2011 17:43, schrieb jesse jaara:
> >> This is from recent kerbel mailing list post. A voice inside Torvals
> >> head is telling hin that it would be time to go for 3.0 v
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 25.05.2011 17:43, schrieb jesse jaara:
>> This is from recent kerbel mailing list post. A voice inside Torvals head is
>> telling hin that it would be time to go for 3.0 versioning
>
> Everyone, don't get too excited. The reasons for "Li
On 05/25/2011 06:53 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 25.05.2011 17:43, schrieb jesse jaara:
This is from recent kerbel mailing list post. A voice inside Torvals head is
telling hin that it would be time to go for 3.0 versioning
Everyone, don't get too excited. The reasons for "Linux 3.0" are
- "th
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Bernardo Barros
wrote:
> If the 3 will stand the the third decade (as the idea is to make a
> system based on time not features), in 10 years we would have to
> rename it again to 'kernel4'.
>
> :-)
>
But why the 26 or 30 is needed at the end of the package name?
Just 'linux' is the most pure and KISS choice. :-)
On 05/25/11 11:42, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Wed, 25 May 2011 17:38:33 +0200
schrieb Heiko Baums:
I guess the best name is kernel30.
Forgot to mention that the kernel package is called kernel... in every
distro I know.
BTW, Debian and Ubuntu switched to calling their linux-kernel-related
packa
If the 3 will stand the the third decade (as the idea is to make a
system based on time not features), in 10 years we would have to
rename it again to 'kernel4'.
:-)
Am 25.05.2011 17:43, schrieb jesse jaara:
> This is from recent kerbel mailing list post. A voice inside Torvals head is
> telling hin that it would be time to go for 3.0 versioning
Everyone, don't get too excited. The reasons for "Linux 3.0" are
- "the numbers are getting too big" (2.6.40)
- the
On 05/25/2011 05:40 PM, Yaro Kasear wrote:
On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 10:20:46 Bernardo Barros wrote:
Hi there,
There are rumors that the next version number of the Linux Kernel is
going to be 3.0.
Since we choosed 'kernel26' as the package name, we will have to
modify it anyway.
Why not just '
This is from recent kerbel mailing list post. A voice inside Torvals head is
telling hin that it would be time to go for 3.0 versioning
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 10:20:46 Bernardo Barros wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> There are rumors that the next version number of the Linux Kernel is
>> going to be 3.0.
>> Since we choosed 'kernel26' as the package name, we will have to
>> modify
Am Wed, 25 May 2011 17:38:33 +0200
schrieb Heiko Baums :
> I guess the best name is kernel30.
Forgot to mention that the kernel package is called kernel... in every
distro I know.
Heiko
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 10:20:46 Bernardo Barros wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > There are rumors that the next version number of the Linux Kernel is
> > going to be 3.0.
> > Since we choosed 'kernel26' as the package name, we will have to
> >
On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 10:20:46 Bernardo Barros wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> There are rumors that the next version number of the Linux Kernel is
> going to be 3.0.
> Since we choosed 'kernel26' as the package name, we will have to
> modify it anyway.
> Why not just 'linux 3.0'? Just an idea.. since
Am Wed, 25 May 2011 17:26:19 +0200
schrieb Jelle van der Waa :
> When the rumours are over and linux is going to release his first
> rc1, then it would make sense to rename kernel26 to linux3.0.
> Except that the lts version will be still kernel26-lts, so maybe
> kernel3.0 would be better. I'm su
Am 25.05.2011 17:20, schrieb Bernardo Barros:
> Hi there,
>
> There are rumors that the next version number of the Linux Kernel is
> going to be 3.0.
> Since we choosed 'kernel26' as the package name, we will have to
> modify it anyway.
> Why not just 'linux 3.0'? Just an idea.. since we have the
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> On 05/25/2011 05:20 PM, Bernardo Barros wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> There are rumors that the next version number of the Linux Kernel is
>> going to be 3.0.
>> Since we choosed 'kernel26' as the package name, we will have to
>> modify it
On 05/25/2011 05:20 PM, Bernardo Barros wrote:
Hi there,
There are rumors that the next version number of the Linux Kernel is
going to be 3.0.
Since we choosed 'kernel26' as the package name, we will have to
modify it anyway.
Why not just 'linux 3.0'? Just an idea.. since we have the fellow
proj
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:20 PM, Bernardo Barros
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> There are rumors that the next version number of the Linux Kernel is
> going to be 3.0.
> Since we choosed 'kernel26' as the package name, we will have to
> modify it anyway.
> Why not just 'linux 3.0'? Just an idea.. since w
Hi there,
There are rumors that the next version number of the Linux Kernel is
going to be 3.0.
Since we choosed 'kernel26' as the package name, we will have to
modify it anyway.
Why not just 'linux 3.0'? Just an idea.. since we have the fellow
project 'Arch Hurd' providing 'hurd' as an alternativ
On 05/25/2011 11:04 AM, F.Gr. wrote:
Hi,
the latest updated of startup-notification (0.10-2 -> 0.12-1) break
some applications: e.g. claws-mail. Downgrading startup-notification
has solved the issue.
or my looking in the bugtracker and notice that is not a
startup-notification bug.
https:/
Hi,
the latest updated of startup-notification (0.10-2 -> 0.12-1) break
some applications: e.g. claws-mail. Downgrading startup-notification
has solved the issue.
The following is the crash-log:
***
Claws Mail version 3.7.9
GTK+ version 2.24.4 / GLib 2.28.7
Locale: it_IT.utf8 (charset: UTF-8)
Fea
37 matches
Mail list logo
