Re: [arch-general] ARCH .y kernel releases do not match kernel.org's

2011-04-23 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am Sonntag 24 April 2011 schrieb Emmanuel Benisty: > Hi, > > I was having some sound issue with ARCH 2.6.38.3 stock kernel so I > started to bisect it from Greg KH's 2.6.38.y stable tree. > .38.2 was good and .38.3 was bad (so I thought) but I hadn't any > single bad commit during bisecting. Howev

[arch-general] ARCH .y kernel releases do not match kernel.org's

2011-04-23 Thread Emmanuel Benisty
Hi, I was having some sound issue with ARCH 2.6.38.3 stock kernel so I started to bisect it from Greg KH's 2.6.38.y stable tree. .38.2 was good and .38.3 was bad (so I thought) but I hadn't any single bad commit during bisecting. However, .38.4 /was/ bad. I could finally find the guilty commit (wh

Re: [arch-general] scipy package - is there anything important that stops the update to 0.9?

2011-04-23 Thread Ray Rashif
2011/4/23 Ángel Velásquez : > 2011/4/22 Andrzej Giniewicz : >> Hi, >> >>> The main issue now is linking to lapack, which fails. There is a >>> symlink hack (you can refer to the python3- PKGBUILD in AUR), but we >>> do not know why and how (this works). Without that hack, SciPy should >>> not be ch

Re: [arch-general] [WAS:arch-dev-public] raptor/rasqal/redland .so rebuilds moved to testing

2011-04-23 Thread Ray Rashif
On 24 April 2011 06:17, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Ray Rashif wrote: >> On 23 April 2011 22:36, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: >>> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Andrea Scarpino >>> wrote: On Saturday 23 April 2011 10:19:42 you wrote: > I see that the {redland,rasqal}-co

[arch-general] Updated TeXLive packages

2011-04-23 Thread Rémy Oudompheng
Hello, I have uploaded updated TeXLive packages in [testing]. Apart from regular package updates from TeXLive, symlinks now belong to their respective packages (FS #23174, FS#22736). Since the currently shipped LuaTeX version (0.62) was unstable, as well as 0.66, the luatex in texlive-bin is now

Re: [arch-general] [WAS:arch-dev-public] raptor/rasqal/redland .so rebuilds moved to testing

2011-04-23 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Ray Rashif wrote: > On 23 April 2011 22:36, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Andrea Scarpino >> wrote: >>> On Saturday 23 April 2011 10:19:42 you wrote: I see that the {redland,rasqal}-compat packages conflict with {redland,rasqal}

[arch-general] building tp_smapi from AUR

2011-04-23 Thread Fons Adriaensen
Don't know if this is the right place to ask... I'm trying to install tp_smapi from AUR. The maintainer is listed as 'xduugu' without mail address. Everything runs fine until: ==> Starting build()... patching file Makefile patching file thinkpad_ec.c patching file tp_smapi.c patching file hdaps.

[arch-general] [signoff] mdadm-3.2.1-3

2011-04-23 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Hi guys, - fixed #23868 - fixed #23691 please signoff both arches greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [arch-general] [WAS:arch-dev-public] raptor/rasqal/redland .so rebuilds moved to testing

2011-04-23 Thread Ray Rashif
On 23 April 2011 22:36, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Andrea Scarpino wrote: >> On Saturday 23 April 2011 10:19:42 you wrote: >>> I see that the {redland,rasqal}-compat packages conflict with >>> {redland,rasqal}. In the case of redland-1.0.13-1 and >>> redland-compat-1.0.12

Re: [arch-general] [WAS:arch-dev-public] raptor/rasqal/redland .so rebuilds moved to testing

2011-04-23 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > On Saturday 23 April 2011 10:19:42 you wrote: >> I see that the {redland,rasqal}-compat packages conflict with >> {redland,rasqal}. In the case of redland-1.0.13-1 and >> redland-compat-1.0.12-1 that means I cannot have both at the same >>

Re: [arch-general] [WAS:arch-dev-public] raptor/rasqal/redland .so rebuilds moved to testing

2011-04-23 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On Saturday 23 April 2011 10:19:42 you wrote: > I see that the {redland,rasqal}-compat packages conflict with > {redland,rasqal}. In the case of redland-1.0.13-1 and > redland-compat-1.0.12-1 that means I cannot have both at the same > time. Which means I have to choose between kdelibs (depends on