Re: [arch-general] What happened to Powerpill?

2011-04-03 Thread Isaac Dupree
On 04/04/11 00:00, Brendan Long wrote: On 03/28/2011 03:43 AM, Cédric Girard wrote: On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: If you have 10 files to download, powerpill allows for 1 file from mirror A, another from mirror B, and chunks of that large 68MB file from mirrors C, D, and

Re: [arch-general] Default Bootloader for AIF

2011-04-03 Thread Brendan Long
On 03/27/2011 01:47 AM, KESHAV P.R. wrote: > On a side note, I think it is also useful to have GPT > partitioning as default now since it is way superior to MBR (see > logical partitions linked-list info) and supports multiple primary > partitions. I'm not sure that it's a good idea to make GPT the

Re: [arch-general] What happened to Powerpill?

2011-04-03 Thread Brendan Long
On 03/28/2011 03:43 AM, Cédric Girard wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: > >> If you have 10 files to download, powerpill allows for 1 file from >> mirror A, another from mirror B, and chunks of that large 68MB file >> from mirrors C, D, and E at the same time. >> >> With

Re: [arch-general] xorg-apps duplicate

2011-04-03 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On Sun, 2011-04-03 at 20:46 +0200, Heiko Baums wrote: > Since the latest xorg groups transition there's a package xorg-apps in > [extra] and a group (xorg-apps). > > I guess one of them - most likely the package in [extra] - should be > removed. > > Heiko Please fill a bug report on http://bugs

[arch-general] xorg-apps duplicate

2011-04-03 Thread Heiko Baums
Since the latest xorg groups transition there's a package xorg-apps in [extra] and a group (xorg-apps). I guess one of them - most likely the package in [extra] - should be removed. Heiko

Re: [arch-general] pacman: downloading without "looking for inter-conflicts"?

2011-04-03 Thread Magnus Therning
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 09:25, Patrick Burroughs wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 00:52, Magnus Therning wrote: >> Is there some way of downloading upgradable packages without running >> the "looking for inter-conflicts" step? > > That would be the '-d' option, I believe. Indeed, it was. Thanks