Excerpts from Tobias Powalowski's message from Fri 25-Mar-11 20:35:
> Am Mittwoch 23 März 2011 schrieb Sander Jansen:
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Richard Schütz
> wrote:
> > > Am 22.03.2011 17:27, schrieb Richard Schütz:
> > > .
> > > I noticed that new X packages hit [testing] and
Please,
I'd like to know if it is possible to use ThinkPad W510 touchscreen on Linux.
I see there are a bunch of kernel modules for touchscreens, but I
can't find this information on the Wiki.
Cheers,
Bernardo
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Hi guys,
> latest upstream release,
>
> please signoff both arches
> greetings
> tpowa
signoff x86_64
I downloaded and extracted the newest firmware for my chip and it still works.
-t
Hi guys,
latest upstream release,
- fixed CFLAGS #22437
- fixed email sending on breakage #20937
please signoff both arches
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a dig
Hi guys,
latest upstream release,
please signoff both arches
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi guys,
latest upstream release,
only bugfixes.
please signoff both arches
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi guys,
latest upstream release,
please signoff both arches
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Upstream update. This package is NOT in testing (2.6.38 currently
resides there), but at:
http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/kernel26/
please signoff for both arches.
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
Am Mittwoch 23 März 2011 schrieb Sander Jansen:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Richard Schütz
wrote:
> > Am 22.03.2011 17:27, schrieb Richard Schütz:
> >> Am 22.03.2011 15:31, schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
> >>> Hi guys,
> >>> please signoff 2.6.38 series for both arches.
> >>>
> >>> Upstream
2011/3/25 Cédric Girard :
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Karol Babioch wrote:
>>
>> As you don't expect a server to be in desperate need of new features and
>> new supported hardware I personally don't think that the latest kernel
>> is needed.
>>
>> What do the others think about it?
>
> No.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Milos Negovanovic <
milos.negovano...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 05:24:37PM +0100, Cédric Girard wrote:
> > No. But what I understood from what Thomas said is: as you need to reboot
> > your server anyway from time to time to apply security update
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Milos Negovanovic <
milos.negovano...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 05:24:37PM +0100, Cédric Girard wrote:
> > No. But what I understood from what Thomas said is: as you need to reboot
> > your server anyway from time to time to apply security updates
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 05:24:37PM +0100, Cédric Girard wrote:
> No. But what I understood from what Thomas said is: as you need to reboot
> your server anyway from time to time to apply security updates, you may
> decide to switch to an even more often updated kernel, if your architecture
> permit
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Karol Babioch wrote:
> Am 25.03.2011 16:42, schrieb Thomas S Hatch:
> > which is why I use the latest kernel on my
> > servers and reboot them a lot becaus
>
> As I'm about to set up some new servers I was thinking about this in the
> past few days. How does it wo
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 05:07:19PM +0100, Karol Babioch wrote:
> Am 25.03.2011 16:42, schrieb Thomas S Hatch:
> > which is why I use the latest kernel on my
> > servers and reboot them a lot becaus
>
> As I'm about to set up some new servers I was thinking about this in the
> past few days. How do
Am 25.03.2011 16:42, schrieb Thomas S Hatch:
> which is why I use the latest kernel on my
> servers and reboot them a lot becaus
As I'm about to set up some new servers I was thinking about this in the
past few days. How does it work out for you?
Because I don't think that rebooting is an option
On 03/25/2011 11:42 AM, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
2011/3/25 Cédric Girard
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:22 PM, David Rosenstrauch
wrote:
Just wondering: what's the general policy about how often (and why)
kernel26-lts gets updated? I know it's supposed to be a "long-term
supported" kernel, making
2011/3/25 Cédric Girard
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:22 PM, David Rosenstrauch >wrote:
>
> > Just wondering: what's the general policy about how often (and why)
> > kernel26-lts gets updated? I know it's supposed to be a "long-term
> > supported" kernel, making it more appropriate for servers a
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:22 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> Just wondering: what's the general policy about how often (and why)
> kernel26-lts gets updated? I know it's supposed to be a "long-term
> supported" kernel, making it more appropriate for servers and such. But
> it seems like it gets
Just wondering: what's the general policy about how often (and why)
kernel26-lts gets updated? I know it's supposed to be a "long-term
supported" kernel, making it more appropriate for servers and such. But
it seems like it gets updated almost as often as the main kernel26
package. Also, I saw
Excerpts from Tobias Powalowski's message from Fri 25-Mar-11 07:46:
> Upstream
> changes:
> http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges
>
> Features included:
> - latest stable patches
> - disabled /dev/kmem
> - added AMD_IOMMU support
> - kernel image is now xz compressed
> - NUMA is enabled on x86_64
On 03/25/11 02:46, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Hi guys,
please signoff 2.6.38 series for both arches.
It's a security update too so it would make sense,
to move in .38.1 to [core] soon.
Or try/upload 2.6.37.5 for those security reasons! Given the amount of
hardware that I have that people report
22 matches
Mail list logo
