Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-1

2011-03-20 Thread Damjan
On 16.03.2011 23:01, Richard Schütz wrote: > Am 16.03.2011 20:27, schrieb Tobias Powalowski: >> Hi guys, >> please signoff 2.6.38 series for both arches. >> >> Upstream >> changes: >> http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges >> >> Features included: >> - kernel image is now xz compressed >> - NUMA is

Re: [arch-general] wicd splitted in 'wicd' and 'wicd-gtk'

2011-03-20 Thread Marek Otahal
Hi, the wick-client-kde looks good, I think I'll use it too. Thanks for the work. Maybe add some of this info to post-upgrade() so ppl know that. Thanks, Marek On Sunday 20 of March 2011 18:19:04 Daniel Isenmann wrote: > Hi, > > like requested as a feature request (FS#22550) and as a solution

[arch-general] wicd splitted in 'wicd' and 'wicd-gtk'

2011-03-20 Thread Daniel Isenmann
Hi, like requested as a feature request (FS#22550) and as a solution to one bug (FS#22423), I have splitted the wicd package into two seperated packages. From now on there is wicd: All stuff you need to run the wicd daemon and the wicd-cli and wicd-curses interfaces wicd-gtk: All stuff you

Re: [arch-general] epoch support in devtools (was: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 3.5.0-1)

2011-03-20 Thread Florian Pritz
On 16.03.2011 19:46, Dan McGee wrote: > Multiple signoffs per architecture would be great, as well as any > observations dealing with the upgrade process. Release notes: > http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git/tree/NEWS devtools doesn't yet support epoch and it looks like rsync and scp don't su

Re: [arch-general] Solution for bug 22690 ?!

2011-03-20 Thread Jan Steffens
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Frederic Bezies wrote: > > But no more card reader support. Well, I'll blacklist it until it is no more > in staging :D > > -- > Frederic Bezies - fredbez...@gmail.com > Weblog : http://frederic.bezies.free.fr/blog/ > You can load the module manually using "modpr

Re: [arch-general] Solution for bug 22690 ?!

2011-03-20 Thread Frederic Bezies
On 20/03/2011 12:14, Jan Steffens wrote: On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Frederic Bezies wrote: Hello. I looked at 2.6.37-1 config changelog comparing it with 2.6.36-2 (or 3) one, and find this option was added. CONFIG_USB_ENESTORAGE=m I'm trying to build a kernel without it. Could be the

Re: [arch-general] Solution for bug 22690 ?!

2011-03-20 Thread Frederic Bezies
On 20/03/2011 12:14, Jan Steffens wrote: On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Frederic Bezies wrote: Hello. I looked at 2.6.37-1 config changelog comparing it with 2.6.36-2 (or 3) one, and find this option was added. CONFIG_USB_ENESTORAGE=m I'm trying to build a kernel without it. Could be the

Re: [arch-general] Solution for bug 22690 ?!

2011-03-20 Thread Jan Steffens
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Frederic Bezies wrote: > Hello. > > I looked at 2.6.37-1 config changelog comparing it with 2.6.36-2 (or 3) one, > and find this option was added. > > CONFIG_USB_ENESTORAGE=m > > I'm trying to build a kernel without it. Could be the answer for my problem > ?! > >

[arch-general] Solution for bug 22690 ?!

2011-03-20 Thread Frederic Bezies
Hello. I looked at 2.6.37-1 config changelog comparing it with 2.6.36-2 (or 3) one, and find this option was added. CONFIG_USB_ENESTORAGE=m I'm trying to build a kernel without it. Could be the answer for my problem ?! -- Frederic Bezies - fredbez...@gmail.com Weblog : http://frederic.bezi