Excerpts from Richard Schütz's message from Wed 16-Mar-11 23:01:
> Am 16.03.2011 20:27, schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
> >Hi guys,
> >please signoff 2.6.38 series for both arches.
> >
> >Upstream
> >changes:
> >http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges
> >
> >Features included:
> >- kernel image is now xz
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Thomas S Hatch
> wrote:
> > If you are familiar with a project spearheaded by Red Hat called Func,
> Salt
> > is very similar.
> >
> > On Thursday I released my first release of the Salt remote execution
>
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
> If you are familiar with a project spearheaded by Red Hat called Func, Salt
> is very similar.
>
> On Thursday I released my first release of the Salt remote execution
> manager, Salt is a tool to allow an admin to execute remote commands on
If you are familiar with a project spearheaded by Red Hat called Func, Salt
is very similar.
On Thursday I released my first release of the Salt remote execution
manager, Salt is a tool to allow an admin to execute remote commands on sets
of systems over the network in an extremely fast and effici
Am 19.03.2011 16:52, schrieb Richard Schütz:
Am 19.03.2011 16:41, schrieb Jeff Cook:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Richard Schütz
wrote:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Jeff Cook
wrote:
Having issues here with ath9k, much slower than it was with 2.6.37.
Found this bug re: Ubuntu on Launch
Just as a side note: I'm using 2.6.38 without problems here, with fair
realtime performance btw.
Am 19.03.2011 16:41, schrieb Jeff Cook:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Richard Schütz wrote:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Jeff Cook
wrote:
Having issues here with ath9k, much slower than it was with 2.6.37.
Found this bug re: Ubuntu on Launchpad, haven't checked the kernel
tracker: ht
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Richard Schütz wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Jeff Cook
>> wrote:
>>> Having issues here with ath9k, much slower than it was with 2.6.37.
>>> Found this bug re: Ubuntu on Launchpad, haven't checked the kernel
>>> tracker: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ub
Any comments to this patch? If there are no objections, could it be applied?
Cheers,
Tom
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Running depmod on boot should not be necessary as the packages
> installing modules should be responsible for updating the dependencies
> themselves (
Am 19.03.2011 09:04, schrieb Jeff Cook:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Jeff Cook wrote:
Hi guys,
please signoff 2.6.38 series for both arches.
Having issues here with ath9k, much slower than it was with 2.6.37.
Found this bug re: Ubuntu on Launchpad, haven't checked the kernel
tracker: htt
On 19/03/11 09:34, SanskritFritz wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Ben Tartsa wrote:
Scroll lock should work while booting.
It does work, yes. But dont try it at my machine, where all messages float
by like lightning.
On this website:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Disable_Clea
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Ben Tartsa wrote:
> Scroll lock should work while booting.
>
>
It does work, yes. But dont try it at my machine, where all messages float
by like lightning.
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Jeff Cook wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>> please signoff 2.6.38 series for both arches.
>
> Having issues here with ath9k, much slower than it was with 2.6.37.
> Found this bug re: Ubuntu on Launchpad, haven't checked the kernel
> tracker: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/
13 matches
Mail list logo
