> Hi guys,
> please signoff 2.6.38 series for both arches.
Having issues here with ath9k, much slower than it was with 2.6.37.
Found this bug re: Ubuntu on Launchpad, haven't checked the kernel
tracker: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/735171
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 19/03/11 08:34, Peter Lewis wrote:
> >It seems to me that something has changed regarding the way pacman handles
> >permissions of its files since 3.5.
>
> Please file a bug report. Before the sync databases were extracted
> so your umask did not matt
On 19/03/11 08:34, Peter Lewis wrote:
Hi,
It seems to me that something has changed regarding the way pacman handles
permissions of its files since 3.5.
I updated to pacman 3.5 yesterday, and today tried to do a pacman -Ss as
my normal user. I got some "error: could not open file" errors and i
Hi,
It seems to me that something has changed regarding the way pacman handles
permissions of its files since 3.5.
I updated to pacman 3.5 yesterday, and today tried to do a pacman -Ss as
my normal user. I got some "error: could not open file" errors and it bailed.
Now, I have my umask set as 0
2011/3/18 Cédric Girard :
> Le 18 mars 2011 18:38, "C Anthony Risinger" a écrit :
>>
>> 2011/3/18 Cédric Girard :
>> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 6:12 PM, C Anthony Risinger >wrote:
>> >
>> >> the other day i had to make a small change to our mail server, and it
>> >> was was down for probably 15 sec
2011/3/18 Cédric Girard :
> This is why I noticed it and decided to ask on the ML if it was really down
> or if it was my corporate network that had again some trouble.
Not to add more noise, but for a quick easy check, try using:
http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/
It will tell you quickly if
Le 18 mars 2011 18:38, "C Anthony Risinger" a écrit :
>
> 2011/3/18 Cédric Girard :
> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 6:12 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> >
> >> the other day i had to make a small change to our mail server, and it
> >> was was down for probably 15 seconds ... but nowadays people have
>
2011/3/18 Cédric Girard :
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 6:12 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>
>> the other day i had to make a small change to our mail server, and it
>> was was down for probably 15 seconds ... but nowadays people have
>> fancy phones that check in every 5 minutes multiplied by hundreds
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 6:12 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> the other day i had to make a small change to our mail server, and it
> was was down for probably 15 seconds ... but nowadays people have
> fancy phones that check in every 5 minutes multiplied by hundreds of
> clients ...
>
Well, I was
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>
> Maybe the consensus is to wait for an hour before posting. Chances are
> we already know it's down.
THE WEBSITE IS DOWN! ugh, it's like a reoccuring waking nightmare.
the other day i had to make a small change to our mail server, and it
Scroll lock should work while booting.
Ben
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 2:05 AM, Richard Schütz wrote:
> Am 18.03.2011 09:56, schrieb SanskritFritz:
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Madhurya Kakati> >wrote:
>>
>> I guess arch should have a boot log. It is something every OS should have
>>> IMH
So, I've decided to unofficially start signing my packages. We don't
need pacman or namcap or support from other tools. Here is how it
works.
gpg --detach-sign foo.pkg.tar.xz
scp foo.pkg.tar.xz.sig pkgbuild.com:~/public_html/sigs/
That is it. Mine are at
http://pkgbuild.com/~kkeen/sigs/
Of cou
Am 18.03.2011 11:41, schrieb Dieter Plaetinck:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:07:02 +0100
> Cédric Girard wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Jan de Groot wrote:
>>
>>> The mailinglist was down also, so reporting it here doesn't help that
>>> much.
>>>
>>
>> Understood. Won't do it again. ;-
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:07:02 +0100
Cédric Girard wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Jan de Groot wrote:
>
> > The mailinglist was down also, so reporting it here doesn't help that
> > much.
> >
>
> Understood. Won't do it again. ;-)
>
is that the conlusion? if the website is down, do
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Jan de Groot wrote:
> The mailinglist was down also, so reporting it here doesn't help that
> much.
>
Understood. Won't do it again. ;-)
--
Cédric Girard
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 10:34 +0530, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
> 2011/3/17 Cédric Girard :
> > 2011/3/17 Cédric Girard
> >
> >> I cannot access (timeout) any archlinux web site except AUR
> >
> >
> > Well, seems back. Sorry for the noise.
> >
> > --
> > Cédric Girard
> >
>
> Next time please wait for
Am 18.03.2011 09:56, schrieb SanskritFritz:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Madhurya Kakatiwrote:
I guess arch should have a boot log. It is something every OS should have
IMHO.
Isn't that dmesg? Or are you looking for something else?
He is looking for the error output of the scripts that
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
> I guess arch should have a boot log. It is something every OS should have
> IMHO.
>
Isn't that dmesg? Or are you looking for something else?
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Richard Schütz wrote:
> Am 16.03.2011 04:55, schrieb Madhurya Kakati:
>>
>> Hi,
>> I am facing some problems with alsa. During booting it shows some
>> errors. But I don't know how to copy those and paste them here. Can
>> someone please tell me where can I find th
19 matches
Mail list logo
