Hi guys,
- bump to latest version
greetings
tpowa
signoff x86_64
--
Regards,
Richard Schütz
Hi guys,
- bump to latest version
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Latest LTS kernel is in testing,
please signoff for both arches
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On 02/19/2011 09:54 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 02/19/2011 09:26 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> Kaiting Chen has provided server space for Trinity binaries. Currently I
>> have
>> the i686 files uploaded and will upload x86_64 shortly (after my kids are
>> done
>> with toontown...
On 02/19/2011 09:26 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> All,
>
> Kaiting Chen has provided server space for Trinity binaries. Currently I
> have
> the i686 files uploaded and will upload x86_64 shortly (after my kids are done
> with toontown)
>
> The url for the i686 repo is:
>
> http://www.ki
All,
Kaiting Chen has provided server space for Trinity binaries. Currently I have
the i686 files uploaded and will upload x86_64 shortly (after my kids are done
with toontown)
The url for the i686 repo is:
http://www.kiwilight.com/~drankinatty/trinity/i686/
(Trinity packages are 2/19/2
> well I think it would be best to have a table that shows for each value of
> each criterion, the last succesful state (if known)
>
> so, for example:
>
> criterion last known state
> Arch:
> - i686 OK on 2011.02.10 (tested by $user)
> - x86_64 OK on 2011.02.05 (tested by $us
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 20:44:22 +0100
Tom Willemsen wrote:
> Hey Dieter,
>
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 05:56:47PM +0100, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> > Hey Tom, what's the status?
> I'm very sorry, I haven't been able to get to it yet, I've only been
> able to look at how django works, I'd forgotten mos
Hey Dieter,
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 05:56:47PM +0100, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> Hey Tom, what's the status?
I'm very sorry, I haven't been able to get to it yet, I've only been
able to look at how django works, I'd forgotten most of it, but it seems
like the best idea to me right now.
> If you ha
On 02/19/2011 03:23 AM, Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
> On 2011/2/19 David C. Rankin wrote:
>> Guys,
>>
>> I have run into an issue that is only causing problems on x86_64. It looks
>> like libxcb. The kcrash file is here:
>>
>> [2k]
>> http://www.3111skyline.com/dl/dt/trinity/errors/x86_64/kdesktop-1.k
On 02/19/2011 12:35 PM, Richard Schütz wrote:
>>How do I add a debugging flag? Do I use CFLAGS=-DEBUG? CPPFLAGS=-DEBUG?
>> add
>> --enable-debug? I've checked ./configure --help and it is silent on the
>> issue.
>> I've added the --enable-debug below. It builds fine, but is only slightly
>>
On 02/19/2011 12:35 PM, Richard Schütz wrote:
>>How do I add a debugging flag? Do I use CFLAGS=-DEBUG? CPPFLAGS=-DEBUG?
>> add
>> --enable-debug? I've checked ./configure --help and it is silent on the
>> issue.
>> I've added the --enable-debug below. It builds fine, but is only slightly
>>
How do I add a debugging flag? Do I use CFLAGS=-DEBUG? CPPFLAGS=-DEBUG? add
--enable-debug? I've checked ./configure --help and it is silent on the issue.
I've added the --enable-debug below. It builds fine, but is only slightly larger
than the original:
-rw-r--r-- 1 david david 274088 Feb 19
On 02/19/2011 11:05 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 02/19/2011 03:23 AM, Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Your backtrace doesn't give any information: you might need to
>> recompile xcb with debug symbols. Do you have messages in the console?
>> It vaguely looks like a failed assertion, so gi
On 02/19/2011 03:23 AM, Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Your backtrace doesn't give any information: you might need to
> recompile xcb with debug symbols. Do you have messages in the console?
> It vaguely looks like a failed assertion, so giving more information
> about what events are actally
Hey Tom, what's the status?
If you have any questions, just let me know how I can help.
If you're not interested anymore, then let me know also, then I can search for
someone else :)
Dieter
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> [2011-02-19 14:36:51 +] Jorge Almeida:
>> OK, but how will you get a clean chroot to begin with?
>> If not with pacman -r, how?
>
>
> Explanation: For your chroot to work properly, you need virtual
> filesystems such as /proc to be mounte
[2011-02-19 14:36:51 +] Jorge Almeida:
> OK, but how will you get a clean chroot to begin with?
> If not with pacman -r, how?
Via Google:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Building_in_a_Clean_Chroot
Explanation: For your chroot to work properly, you need virtual
filesystems
2011/2/19 Ángel Velásquez :
> 2011/2/19 Jorge Almeida :
>> I've been reading several pieces of documentation about making a
>> custom LiveCD, in particular the documentation for Archiso. Makefiles
>> and bash are not my strong suit, so I may have misunderstood
>> something. Among other things, we n
2011/2/19 Jorge Almeida :
> I've been reading several pieces of documentation about making a
> custom LiveCD, in particular the documentation for Archiso. Makefiles
> and bash are not my strong suit, so I may have misunderstood
> something. Among other things, we need to create a directory, say
> "
I've been reading several pieces of documentation about making a
custom LiveCD, in particular the documentation for Archiso. Makefiles
and bash are not my strong suit, so I may have misunderstood
something. Among other things, we need to create a directory, say
"prov", and populate it with an arch
On 2011/2/19 David C. Rankin wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I have run into an issue that is only causing problems on x86_64. It looks
> like libxcb. The kcrash file is here:
>
> [2k]
> http://www.3111skyline.com/dl/dt/trinity/errors/x86_64/kdesktop-1.kcrash
>
> I need to figure out if this is an upstream l
22 matches
Mail list logo
