Re: [arch-general] How best to downgrade gcc to 4.4 or 4.3?

2011-02-13 Thread David C. Rankin
On 02/13/2011 10:07 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > None - you probably need to rebuild earlier Trinity components with the older > gcc though. > > Allan Thanks! -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.

Re: [arch-general] How best to downgrade gcc to 4.4 or 4.3?

2011-02-13 Thread Allan McRae
On 14/02/11 13:59, David C. Rankin wrote: On 02/13/2011 09:52 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: On 02/13/2011 08:52 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: On 02/13/2011 07:07 PM, Allan McRae wrote: That is not a downgrade but a separate package. You will need to use something like "CC=gcc-4.3 ./configure" in y

Re: [arch-general] How best to downgrade gcc to 4.4 or 4.3?

2011-02-13 Thread David C. Rankin
On 02/13/2011 09:52 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 02/13/2011 08:52 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: >> On 02/13/2011 07:07 PM, Allan McRae wrote: >>> That is not a downgrade but a separate package. You will need to use >>> something >>> like "CC=gcc-4.3 ./configure" in your PKGBUILD to use that gcc

Re: [arch-general] How best to downgrade gcc to 4.4 or 4.3?

2011-02-13 Thread David C. Rankin
On 02/13/2011 08:52 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 02/13/2011 07:07 PM, Allan McRae wrote: >> That is not a downgrade but a separate package. You will need to use >> something >> like "CC=gcc-4.3 ./configure" in your PKGBUILD to use that gcc version. >> >> Allan > > Oh, your good... > > I w

Re: [arch-general] util-linux 2.19 release

2011-02-13 Thread Dave Reisner
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 08:42:30PM -0500, Dave Reisner wrote: > Attached is a changelog and a PKGBUILD for the recently released > util-linux 2.19. Changes I've made to the PKGBUILD: > > - name change: the project is once again called util-linux. I've updated > the conflicts accordingly, and rem

Re: [arch-general] How best to downgrade gcc to 4.4 or 4.3?

2011-02-13 Thread David C. Rankin
On 02/13/2011 07:07 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > That is not a downgrade but a separate package. You will need to use > something > like "CC=gcc-4.3 ./configure" in your PKGBUILD to use that gcc version. > > Allan Oh, your good... I would have messed that up royally. Thanks for being clairvoyan

Re: [arch-general] util-linux 2.19 release

2011-02-13 Thread Kaiting Chen
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: > Other thoughts: If we build this with --enable-libmount-mount, we can do > away with /etc/mtab and make it a symlink to /proc/self/mounts. It is, > however, marked as experimental in the release notes. > Hi, how does the --enable-libmount-mo

Re: [arch-general] util-linux 2.19 release

2011-02-13 Thread Damjan
Attached is a changelog and a PKGBUILD for the recently released util-linux 2.19. Changes I've made to the PKGBUILD: - name change: the project is once again called util-linux. BTW, if anyone knows, does this version fullfill all the systemd requirements? -- дамјан

[arch-general] util-linux 2.19 release

2011-02-13 Thread Dave Reisner
Attached is a changelog and a PKGBUILD for the recently released util-linux 2.19. Changes I've made to the PKGBUILD: - name change: the project is once again called util-linux. I've updated the conflicts accordingly, and removed the ancient reference to linux32. I think its worth keeping the v

Re: [arch-general] How best to downgrade gcc to 4.4 or 4.3?

2011-02-13 Thread Allan McRae
On 14/02/11 10:59, David C. Rankin wrote: On 02/13/2011 06:42 PM, Allan McRae wrote: Grab the gcc43 package from the AUR. I had a quick look at the PKGBUILD and it looks good. The gcc44 package not so much... Allan Great! Thank you Allan, I'll be downgrading a VirtualBox VM so if it

Re: [arch-general] How best to downgrade gcc to 4.4 or 4.3?

2011-02-13 Thread David C. Rankin
On 02/13/2011 06:42 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > > > Grab the gcc43 package from the AUR. I had a quick look at the PKGBUILD and > it > looks good. The gcc44 package not so much... > > Allan Great! Thank you Allan, I'll be downgrading a VirtualBox VM so if it all goes south - not much of an

Re: [arch-general] How best to downgrade gcc to 4.4 or 4.3?

2011-02-13 Thread Allan McRae
On 14/02/11 10:35, David C. Rankin wrote: Guys, After running into a gcc 4.5.2 segfault, the trinity developer suggested a test to downgrade gcc to 4.4 or 4.3 and see if the gcc issue and issue concerning iccconfig.cpp go away. Looking through my old packages, the earliest I can find is 4.5.1

[arch-general] How best to downgrade gcc to 4.4 or 4.3?

2011-02-13 Thread David C. Rankin
Guys, After running into a gcc 4.5.2 segfault, the trinity developer suggested a test to downgrade gcc to 4.4 or 4.3 and see if the gcc issue and issue concerning iccconfig.cpp go away. Looking through my old packages, the earliest I can find is 4.5.1. How best to downgrade?... and will I bre

Re: [arch-general] gcc: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

2011-02-13 Thread David C. Rankin
On 02/11/2011 12:59 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > Guys, > > Has anyone else experienced a segmentation fault with the current gcc? I > received the following: > > In file included from > /home/david/tbld/kdebase/kcontrol/konq/fontopts.cpp:387:0: > /home/david/tbld/kdebase/src/kcontrol/konq/

[arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.37-6

2011-02-13 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Hi guys, - rebuild against latest binutils/glibc greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-lts 2.6.32.28-4

2011-02-13 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Latest LTS kernel is in testing, - rebuild against latest binutils/glibc please signoff for both arches greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed messa