On 02/11/2011 03:07 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 00:52 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
Hi,
i was a bit to excited by the new gtk3 released and i moved it to
testing without realizing that the new application lookup that comes
with it would break gnome 2.32 handling applications badly.
Pl
On 11.02.2011 06:19, Thomas Dean wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have an encounter with a small but annoying problem.
>
> After typing pm-suspend and then resuming my laptop, it sometimes beeps,
> which never happens if I haven't ever suspend it.
>
> For example, when I type too much backspace in VIM, it
Hi folks,
I have an encounter with a small but annoying problem.
After typing pm-suspend and then resuming my laptop, it sometimes beeps,
which never happens if I haven't ever suspend it.
For example, when I type too much backspace in VIM, it beeps; when I
push the shutdown button, it beeps; whe
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 00:52 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> Hi,
> i was a bit to excited by the new gtk3 released and i moved it to
> testing without realizing that the new application lookup that comes
> with it would break gnome 2.32 handling applications badly.
>
> Please revert back to core/extra
On Wed 09 Feb 2011 11:23 -0500, Stéphane Gaudreault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking at FS#20778 and was wondering what we should do with it.
>
> While it is true that the "traditional vi" is buggy and not user
> friendly. It does not seems that BusyBox is a good alternative.
>
> There are options
Excerpts from Allan McRae's message of 2011-02-10 17:12:54 -0500:
> Is the current vi package actually usable for an install by someone more
> familiar with it?
Yes, I have used it a few times, and prefer it over nano.
--
David Campbell
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 22:56 +0100, Marek Otahal wrote:
> On Thursday 10 of February 2011 17:59:26 Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 17:52:16 +0100, Jan de Groot wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 17:24 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> > >> we did had vi being a stripped vim package in the pa
On Thursday 10 of February 2011 17:59:26 Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 17:52:16 +0100, Jan de Groot wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 17:24 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> >> we did had vi being a stripped vim package in the past. We got rid of
> >> it
> >> because upstream vim started to
On 02/10/2011 07:03 PM, Magnus Therning wrote:
repo-add repo.db.tar.gz `find . -name "*.pkg.tar.gz" | sort`
That is in fact broken, because it sorts just like 'ls *':
% ls *.pkg.tar.gz
foo-1.2.3.1-1.pkg.tar.gz foo-1.2.3-1.pkg.tar.gz
% find . -name \*.pkg.tar.gz|sort
./foo-1.2.3.1-
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 06:33:07PM +0100, PyroPeter wrote:
> On 02/09/2011 05:05 PM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> >I've noticied that repo-add will blindly overwrite the entry of an
> >already added package with whatever you point it to. Even if the
> >existing entry is for a version that is newer. I
On 02/09/2011 05:05 PM, Magnus Therning wrote:
I've noticied that repo-add will blindly overwrite the entry of an
already added package with whatever you point it to. Even if the
existing entry is for a version that is newer. It basically means
that "repo-add repo.db.tar.gz *.pkg.tar.xz" doesn'
Note that I've been talking with Tom on Fosdem, and we already
privately mailed about this.
In a mail he asked "why not let AIF create a textfile
automatically, then just submit that textfile to the webapp?"
I think that's a good idea:
- less manual work for the user.
- no webform needed (but we n
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:47:51AM +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 10.02.2011 10:39, schrieb Tom Willemsen:
> > On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 07:40:24PM -0500, Kaiting Chen wrote:
> >> Hey I might be able to do it. But it's not going to look pretty because I'm
> >> not a designer. --Kaiting.
> > How is
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:47:51 +0100
Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 10.02.2011 10:39, schrieb Tom Willemsen:
> > On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 07:40:24PM -0500, Kaiting Chen wrote:
> >> Hey I might be able to do it. But it's not going to look pretty
> >> because I'm not a designer. --Kaiting.
> > How is this
Am 10.02.2011 10:39, schrieb Tom Willemsen:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 07:40:24PM -0500, Kaiting Chen wrote:
>> Hey I might be able to do it. But it's not going to look pretty because I'm
>> not a designer. --Kaiting.
> How is this going? Because I would also like to help/do it.
>
> Same thing appl
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 07:40:24PM -0500, Kaiting Chen wrote:
> Hey I might be able to do it. But it's not going to look pretty because I'm
> not a designer. --Kaiting.
How is this going? Because I would also like to help/do it.
Same thing applies though, not a designer :)
Tom
16 matches
Mail list logo
