I hacked an "xinitrc.d framework". The details are at
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Xinitrc.d_Framework. I'm only one
person, so I'd appreciate any comments.
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> So I would like a web application that gives me "a pretty good idea" of the
> quality of current/recent images.
> I request someone other then me to make this app for me, I do not have the
> time. (I do have time for feedback or making adju
On 02/07/2011 06:21 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 6:10 PM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
Guys,
After building trinity-kdelibs, I need to create an entry and set
LD_LIBRARY_PATH to /opt/trinity/lib. I manually created:
'/etc/ld.so.conf.d/trinity.conf' containing "/opt/t
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 6:10 PM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> Guys,
>
> After building trinity-kdelibs, I need to create an entry and set
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH to /opt/trinity/lib. I manually created:
> '/etc/ld.so.conf.d/trinity.conf' containing "/opt/trinity/lib" and then ran
> ldconfig. That work
On 02/07/2011 07:10 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
After building trinity-kdelibs, I need to create an entry and set
LD_LIBRARY_PATH to /opt/trinity/lib. I manually created:
'/etc/ld.so.conf.d/trinity.conf' containing "/opt/trinity/lib" and
then ran ldconfig. That worked.
What I n
On 02/07/2011 01:15 PM, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
That's what I'm doing. I have Arch on my laptop (as the host running
> kdemod3) and I have virtualbox running with Arch installed in that (as
> the guest with fluxbox) to build Trinity in. It's all running on my
> laptop so it should all b
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Magnus Therning wrote:
>
> How much are you willing to pay for this piece of bespoke software?
my guess would be the noble sum of $0,000.00; he might even throw in
everything under the couch cushions if the app turns out pretty good
:-)
C Anthony
Guys,
After building trinity-kdelibs, I need to create an entry and set
LD_LIBRARY_PATH to /opt/trinity/lib. I manually created:
'/etc/ld.so.conf.d/trinity.conf' containing "/opt/trinity/lib" and then ran
ldconfig. That worked.
What I need to know is how to properly do this from the kdelib
On 02/07/2011 06:41 PM, Magnus Therning wrote:
On 07/02/11 22:52, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
Hi,
for Arch releng, we have recently started automatically building test builds
(http://releng.archlinux.org/isos/). These images are built from the archiso
and aif git repositories, and the current state
How much are you willing to pay for this piece of bespoke software?
/M
On 07/02/11 22:52, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> Hi,
> for Arch releng, we have recently started automatically building test builds
> (http://releng.archlinux.org/isos/). These images are built from the archiso
> and aif git repo
Hi,
for Arch releng, we have recently started automatically building test builds
(http://releng.archlinux.org/isos/). These images are built from the archiso
and aif git repositories, and the current state of the repos.
The idea is that people can test these images, and once in a while, I will
p
David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 02/06/2011 06:10 AM, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
>> Cannot you just display everything on the host X server by setting
>> DISPLAY to the appropriate value?
>>
>
> Thanks Jerome,
>
> That's what I'm doing. I have Arch on my laptop (as the host running
> kdemod3) a
I gave an AIF (related) talk at Fosdem this year.
For more info, video and slides:
http://dieter.plaetinck.be/can_we_build_a_simple_cross-distribution_installation_framework.html
Dieter
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 07/02/11 20:26, Seblu wrote:
>>
>> 2011/2/6 Allan McRae:
>>>
>>> On 06/02/11 20:16, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 20:10 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>
> I have removed the glibc-2.13-2 package until a fix is committed
On 07/02/11 20:26, Seblu wrote:
2011/2/6 Allan McRae:
On 06/02/11 20:16, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 20:10 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
I have removed the glibc-2.13-2 package until a fix is committed to
upstream git. All users should downgrade to the version in [core].
Allan
Whi
2011/2/6 Allan McRae :
> On 06/02/11 20:16, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 20:10 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>>>
>>> I have removed the glibc-2.13-2 package until a fix is committed to
>>> upstream git. All users should downgrade to the version in [core].
>>>
>>> Allan
>>
>> While I un
On 02/07/2011 11:12 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 11:07 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 02/07/2011 10:51 AM, Olivier Keun wrote:
What are your thoughts about this? I'm hoping to get an official reaction
from our dev-team, so we can avoid some of the confusion that is present
now.
t
On 7 February 2011 17:33, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 07.02.2011 10:26, schrieb Olivier Keun | CAPSTONE:
>> Maybe it would be better if a more fundamental line is drawn between the
>> two, such as the website design like Ionuț mentions. And a clear statement
>> on the ArchBang website that it is _n
Sorry Jelle, i think you misunderstood, i definitely do want their support
taken place on their own forums. I merely meant they (ArchBang) should
explicitly _not_ tell users to seek support on our forums -- which is what
is happening now.
2011/2/7 Jelle van der Waa
> On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 10:26
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 10:26 +0100, Olivier Keun | CAPSTONE wrote:
> I also have no problem with other distros using Arch as a basis, but the
> problem is that it causes a pretty big influx of newbies who have no idea
> how to configure and maintain Arch since they installed a one-click
> installer
We've had a few occurrences on the Arch forums where it became clear that
ArchBang actually ships some changed configs, so this could become quite
confusing i guess.
2011/2/7 Thomas Bächler
> Am 07.02.2011 10:26, schrieb Olivier Keun | CAPSTONE:
> > Maybe it would be better if a more fundamenta
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 17:12 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 11:07 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> > On 02/07/2011 10:51 AM, Olivier Keun wrote:
> > >
> > > What are your thoughts about this? I'm hoping to get an official reaction
> > > from our dev-team, so we can avoid some of the conf
Am 07.02.2011 10:26, schrieb Olivier Keun | CAPSTONE:
> Maybe it would be better if a more fundamental line is drawn between the
> two, such as the website design like Ionuț mentions. And a clear statement
> on the ArchBang website that it is _not_ an official Arch project.
Maybe it would be a goo
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 10:26 +0100, Olivier Keun | CAPSTONE wrote:
> I also have no problem with other distros using Arch as a basis, but the
> problem is that it causes a pretty big influx of newbies who have no idea
> how to configure and maintain Arch since they installed a one-click
> installer.
I also have no problem with other distros using Arch as a basis, but the
problem is that it causes a pretty big influx of newbies who have no idea
how to configure and maintain Arch since they installed a one-click
installer.
The devs have mentioned before that we want to attract serious, competen
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 11:07 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> On 02/07/2011 10:51 AM, Olivier Keun wrote:
> >
> > What are your thoughts about this? I'm hoping to get an official reaction
> > from our dev-team, so we can avoid some of the confusion that is present
> > now.
> >
>
> there is nothing wrong
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 09:51 +0100, Olivier Keun wrote:
> On the forums, we see an increasing number of threads about ArchBang.
> Understandably so, since not only does it carry "Arch" in the name, it also
> uses the same styling [1], and supposedly users are told there to use the
> Arch wiki and f
On 02/07/2011 10:51 AM, Olivier Keun wrote:
What are your thoughts about this? I'm hoping to get an official reaction
from our dev-team, so we can avoid some of the confusion that is present
now.
there is nothing wrong with this distro and others distros that have
arch as a base.
Is good t
On the forums, we see an increasing number of threads about ArchBang.
Understandably so, since not only does it carry "Arch" in the name, it also
uses the same styling [1], and supposedly users are told there to use the
Arch wiki and forum for support.
People are asking if ArchBang is an official
29 matches
Mail list logo
