Re: [arch-general] Robson Peixoto invited you to Dropbox
Unsubscribed from Dropbox invites for this email. On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Dropbox wrote: > Robson Peixoto wants you to use Dropbox to sync and share files online and > across computers. > > Get started here: > http://www.dropbox.com/link/20.Mud84jNR4I/NjYxNDQ4NTE1Nw?src=referrals_ab_bul
[arch-general] Robson Peixoto invited you to Dropbox
Robson Peixoto wants you to use Dropbox to sync and share files online and across computers. Get started here: http://www.dropbox.com/link/20.Mud84jNR4I/NjYxNDQ4NTE1Nw?src=referrals_ab_bulk6 - The Dropbox Team To stop receiving invites from
Re: [arch-general] Rail Model font for coders
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 04:40:12 -0500 (EST), hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_h...@lavabit.com wrote: > There is a font for coders called Rail Model, please include it with Linux> > [..] > Meeku I have banned this account due to spam. A note to everybody
Re: [arch-general] Rail Model font for coders
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Yaro Kasear wrote: > On Sunday, January 23, 2011 12:20:17 pm Nathan Wayde wrote: >> On 23/01/11 18:13, >> hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_h >> are_h...@lavabit.com >> >> wrote: >> >> .you're a troll and a spammer. Get
Re: [arch-general] Rail Model font for coders
On Sunday, January 23, 2011 12:20:17 pm Nathan Wayde wrote: > On 23/01/11 18:13, > hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_h > are_h...@lavabit.com > > wrote: > >> .you're a troll and a spammer. Get the hell off my mailing list. > > > > Meeku: This attitude
Re: [arch-general] Rail Model font for coders
On 23/01/11 18:13, hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_h...@lavabit.com wrote: .you're a troll and a spammer. Get the hell off my mailing list. Meeku: This attitude does not do the reputation of your o/s any good. If you don't want to use the f
Re: [arch-general] Rail Model font for coders
On Sunday, January 23, 2011 12:17:54 pm o...@deathbycomputers.co.uk wrote: > Been lurking here for a while and I'm now really considering dropping this > list. Please do not feed the troll it will only make it worse. > > Cani > Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device > > -Original Message--
Re: [arch-general] Rail Model font for coders
Been lurking here for a while and I'm now really considering dropping this list. Please do not feed the troll it will only make it worse. Cani Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device -Original Message- From: hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_ha
Re: [arch-general] Rail Model font for coders
On Sunday, January 23, 2011 12:15:59 pm hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_h...@lavabit.com wrote: > > .trying to get people to use your font.spam.we're. > > Meeku: If you don't want to use the font fine. I don't want you spamming yo
Re: [arch-general] Rail Model font for coders
On Sunday, January 23, 2011 12:13:19 pm hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_h...@lavabit.com wrote: > > .you're a troll and a spammer. Get the hell off my mailing list. > > Meeku: This attitude does not do the reputation of your o/s any good. If
Re: [arch-general] Rail Model font for coders
2011-01-23
Thread
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_hare
> .trying to get people to use your font.spam.we're. Meeku: If you don't want to use the font fine.
Re: [arch-general] Rail Model font for coders
2011-01-23
Thread
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_hare
> .you're a troll and a spammer. Get the hell off my mailing list. Meeku: This attitude does not do the reputation of your o/s any good. If you don't want to use the font fine.
Re: [arch-general] Rail Model font for coders
On Sunday, January 23, 2011 12:08:59 pm hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_h...@lavabit.com wrote: > > .stop spamming the mailing list. > > Meeku: I respond to silly accusations and now I get hounded also. It's not a silly accusation when you're
Re: [arch-general] Rail Model font for coders
2011-01-23
Thread
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_hare
> .stop spamming the mailing list. Meeku: I respond to silly accusations and now I get hounded also.
Re: [arch-general] Rail Model font for coders
On Sunday, January 23, 2011 12:05:15 pm hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_h...@lavabit.com wrote: > > Can somebody ban him? > > Meeku: Well then I question your opinion-judgement because font, coding > and operating systems are related. If the spam
Re: [arch-general] Rail Model font for coders
On Sunday, January 23, 2011 12:03:25 pm hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_h...@lavabit.com wrote: > > I'm racist against trolls. Am I a horrible person? > > Meeku: If the spam allegation is motivated by seeing spiritual email > addresses on a publi
Re: [arch-general] Rail Model font for coders
2011-01-23
Thread
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_hare
> Can somebody ban him? Meeku: Well then I question your opinion-judgement because font, coding and operating systems are related. If the spam allegation is motivated by seeing spiritual email addresses on a public mailing list rather than contents or the on-topic contents are ignored, then it i
Re: [arch-general] Rail Model font for coders
On Sunday, January 23, 2011 12:00:55 pm hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_h...@lavabit.com wrote: > > The fact he called it racism smells of a troll to me. Trolls are worse > > than > > spammers. > > Meeku: No. The person who did not wish me to par
Re: [arch-general] Rail Model font for coders
2011-01-23
Thread
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_hare
> I'm racist against trolls. Am I a horrible person? Meeku: If the spam allegation is motivated by seeing spiritual email addresses on a public mailing list rather than contents or the on-topic contents are ignored, then it is not spam.
Re: [arch-general] Rail Model font for coders
Can somebody ban him? -- Kirill Churin Jabber: reflex...@reflexing.ru, ICQ: 8163230, Skype on demand.
Re: [arch-general] Rail Model font for coders
2011-01-23
Thread
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_hare
> trollish . Meeku: No. The person who did not wish me to participate on this mailing list tactically made his personal opinion to be representative for others also by using the 'our' word.
Re: [arch-general] Rail Model font for coders
2011-01-23
Thread
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_hare
> The fact he called it racism smells of a troll to me. Trolls are worse > than > spammers. Meeku: No. The person who did not wish me to participate on this mailing list tactically made his personal opinion to be representative for others also by using the 'our' word. I also want to research t
Re: [arch-general] Rail Model font for coders
2011-01-23
Thread
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_hare
> How does pointing you out to be a spammer make him a racist all of a > sudden? Meeku: No. The person who did not wish me to participate on this mailing list tactically made his personal opinion to be representative for others also by using the 'our' word. > I smell troll. Meeku: I also want
Re: [arch-general] Rail Model font for coders
2011-01-23
Thread
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_hare
> .Accusations of racism simply because your spam is > being identified as such? Meeku: No. The person who did not wish me to participate on this mailing list tactically made his personal opinion to be representative for others also by using the 'our' word. > What 'spam' is is decided by t
Re: [arch-general] Rail Model font for coders
2011-01-23
Thread
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_hare
> However, I also gave the original post the benefit of the doubt since it > seems to be something that may benefit a community of people . Meeku: I am grateful for these words.
Re: [arch-general] Rail Model font for coders
2011-01-23
Thread
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_hare
> I have nothing against your race . > Namaste. Meeku: I am grateful for these words.
Re: [arch-general] GPG signature
Hi! On Sunday 23 January 2011 13:48:15 Karol Babioch wrote: > Have you actually the latest version of my key? I've updated it quite a > while ago, and plan to do so each year, as I've read somewhere that this > is good praxis, just in case you loose your private key / revocation > certificate. Ok
Re: [arch-general] GPG signature
Hi, Am 23.01.2011 12:45, schrieb Frank Thieme: > his signing key is expired... Have you actually the latest version of my key? I've updated it quite a while ago, and plan to do so each year, as I've read somewhere that this is good praxis, just in case you loose your private key / revocation cert
Re: [arch-general] GPG signature (was: GPT slower than MBR, although both are properly aligned?)
On Sunday 23 January 2011 10:42:29 Guillaume ALAUX wrote: > I imported both Karol's signature and yours and Evo says the signature > is valid. It just complains as I haven't signed nor set any trust on it > but this is the right behavior. Your's is "The signature is valid, but the key's validity i
Re: [arch-general] GPG signature
On 2011-01-23 at 11:07 +0100, Karol Babioch wrote: > Am 23.01.2011 10:42, schrieb Guillaume ALAUX: > > I imported both Karol's signature and yours and Evo says the > > signature is valid. It just complains as I haven't signed nor > > set any trust on it but this is the right behavior. > > thanks fo
Re: [arch-general] GPG signature
Ah. But this is perfectly normal. I suggest the complaining ops reread the PGP manual: http://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual.html#AEN346 On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 17:07:15 +0700, Karol Babioch wrote: Hi, Am 23.01.2011 10:42, schrieb Guillaume ALAUX: I imported both Karol's signature and yours
Re: [arch-general] GPG signature
Hi, Am 23.01.2011 10:42, schrieb Guillaume ALAUX: > I imported both Karol's signature and yours and Evo says the signature > is valid. It just complains as I haven't signed nor set any trust on it > but this is the right behavior. thanks for your positive reply, I already thought of a bad setup h
Re: [arch-general] Gnome Sound Events and Settings
On 01/23/2011 09:57 AM, Steve Holmes wrote: On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 06:38:08PM +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote: ... Sound preferences exists only if you install pulseaudio and corresponding pulse package for gnome (pacman -S pulseaudio-gnome) I cannot find pulseaudio-gnome in standard repos. Or I sho
Re: [arch-general] GPG signature (was: GPT slower than MBR, although both are properly aligned?)
On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 09:03 +0100, Frank Thieme wrote: > Hi! > > Maybe it's just me, but all your messages in this thread have a bad > signature... > > Bye...Frank Hello, I imported both Karol's signature and yours and Evo says the signature is valid. It just complains as I haven't signed nor
Re: [arch-general] GPG signature (was: GPT slower than MBR, although both are properly aligned?)
Hi! Maybe it's just me, but all your messages in this thread have a bad signature... Bye...Frank signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
