Re: [arch-general] kernel 2.6.37 BKL

2011-01-05 Thread Ray Rashif
On 6 January 2011 09:38, Bernardo Barros wrote: > 2011/1/5 Ng Oon-Ee : >> At this point in time leaving it enabled for compatibility in kernel26 >> is fine IMO. Those who need it disabled for specific reasons (the one I >> can think of is task latency for audio) should already be used to >> compil

Re: [arch-general] kernel 2.6.37 BKL

2011-01-05 Thread Alexander Lam
At this point the BKL doesn't cause much performance loss: "The Big Kernel Lock is a giant lock that was introduced in Linux 2.0, when Alan Cox introduced SMP support for first time. But it was just an step to achieve SMP scalability - only one process can run kernel code at the same time in Linux

Re: [arch-general] kernel 2.6.37 BKL

2011-01-05 Thread Bernardo Barros
2011/1/5 Ng Oon-Ee : > At this point in time leaving it enabled for compatibility in kernel26 > is fine IMO. Those who need it disabled for specific reasons (the one I > can think of is task latency for audio) should already be used to > compiling patched kernels, so it wouldn't be a big deal for n

Re: [arch-general] kernel 2.6.37 BKL

2011-01-05 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 19:45 -0500, Matthew Monaco wrote: > On 01/05/2011 07:23 PM, Jan Steffens wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Matthew Monaco > > wrote: > >> Devs, > >> > >> Any plans about the BKL setting in .37? I've been running the rc's without > >> it for a while now. > >> > > >

Re: [arch-general] kernel 2.6.37 BKL

2011-01-05 Thread Thorsten Töpper
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 18:28:42 -0600 Yaro Kasear wrote: > On Wednesday, January 05, 2011 05:51:02 pm Matthew Monaco wrote: > > Devs, > > > > Any plans about the BKL setting in .37? I've been running the rc's > > without it for a while now. > > What is BKL? The Big Kernel Lock, search the Web there

Re: [arch-general] kernel 2.6.37 BKL

2011-01-05 Thread Matthew Monaco
On 01/05/2011 07:23 PM, Jan Steffens wrote: On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Matthew Monaco wrote: Devs, Any plans about the BKL setting in .37? I've been running the rc's without it for a while now. Leave it enabled. It's important for compatibility with older drivers. The thing is, and

Re: [arch-general] kernel 2.6.37 BKL

2011-01-05 Thread Yaro Kasear
On Wednesday, January 05, 2011 05:51:02 pm Matthew Monaco wrote: > Devs, > > Any plans about the BKL setting in .37? I've been running the rc's without > it for a while now. What is BKL?

Re: [arch-general] kernel 2.6.37 BKL

2011-01-05 Thread Jan Steffens
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Matthew Monaco wrote: > Devs, > > Any plans about the BKL setting in .37? I've been running the rc's without > it for a while now. > Leave it enabled. It's important for compatibility with older drivers.

[arch-general] kernel 2.6.37 BKL

2011-01-05 Thread Matthew Monaco
Devs, Any plans about the BKL setting in .37? I've been running the rc's without it for a while now.

[arch-general] gnucash in [extra]

2011-01-05 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
Hi, I noticed that said package is out of date, am attaching a slightly updated PKGBUILD for the latest version here (compiles and runs fine on my machine x86_64). Normally I'd wait, but the maintainer is Aaron and as I understand he's not very active round these parts anymore. P.S. - hope the at