Re: [arch-general] PulseAudio in [testing]

2010-11-26 Thread Philipp Überbacher
Excerpts from C Anthony Risinger's message of 2010-11-27 08:11:04 +0100: > 2010/11/27 Ng Oon-Ee : > > On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 23:02 -0600, C Anthony Risinger wrote: > >> On Nov 26, 2010, at 10:57 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > >> > >> > On 27/11/10 14:51, C Anthony Risinger wrote: > >> >> Good to see the

Re: [arch-general] PulseAudio in [testing]

2010-11-26 Thread C Anthony Risinger
2010/11/27 Ng Oon-Ee : > On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 23:02 -0600, C Anthony Risinger wrote: >> On Nov 26, 2010, at 10:57 PM, Allan McRae wrote: >> >> > On 27/11/10 14:51, C Anthony Risinger wrote: >> >> Good to see the overwhelming positive lean; is pulse being considered >> >> for an eventual default b

Re: [arch-general] PulseAudio in [testing]

2010-11-26 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 23:02 -0600, C Anthony Risinger wrote: > On Nov 26, 2010, at 10:57 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > > > On 27/11/10 14:51, C Anthony Risinger wrote: > >> Good to see the overwhelming positive lean; is pulse being considered > >> for an eventual default by chance? > > > > Almost noth

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel 2.6.36.1-3

2010-11-26 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Jan de Groot wrote: > On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 18:36 -0600, David C. Rankin wrote: >> Tobias, >> >>       You'da Man! kernel26 2.6.36.1-3 boot FINE on that whacky MSI based >> box. I don't >> know if you know what changed, but if so, I'm dying to find out. After >>

Re: [arch-general] PulseAudio in [testing]

2010-11-26 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Nov 26, 2010, at 10:57 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > On 27/11/10 14:51, C Anthony Risinger wrote: >> Good to see the overwhelming positive lean; is pulse being considered >> for an eventual default by chance? > > Almost nothing is default on Arch... Beh you know what I mean :-) i.e. "recommeded",

Re: [arch-general] PulseAudio in [testing]

2010-11-26 Thread Allan McRae
On 27/11/10 14:51, C Anthony Risinger wrote: Good to see the overwhelming positive lean; is pulse being considered for an eventual default by chance? Almost nothing is default on Arch...

Re: [arch-general] PulseAudio in [testing]

2010-11-26 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Nov 26, 2010, at 7:58 PM, Jan Steffens wrote: On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 2:26 AM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: On 11/27/2010 02:46 AM, Yaro Kasear wrote: On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 21:34 +0100, Jan Steffens wrote: I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no feedback on this. This e

Re: [arch-general] PulseAudio in [testing]

2010-11-26 Thread Jan Steffens
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 2:26 AM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > On 11/27/2010 02:46 AM, Yaro Kasear wrote: >> >> On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 21:34 +0100, Jan Steffens wrote: >>> >>> I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no >>> feedback on this. >>> >>> This either means it works well, or n

Re: [arch-general] PulseAudio in [testing]

2010-11-26 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 11/27/2010 02:46 AM, Yaro Kasear wrote: On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 21:34 +0100, Jan Steffens wrote: I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no feedback on this. This either means it works well, or nobody uses it. So I'm asking for it now, especially from GNOME and KDE user

Re: [arch-general] PulseAudio in [testing]

2010-11-26 Thread Allan McRae
On 27/11/10 06:34, Jan Steffens wrote: I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no feedback on this. This either means it works well, or nobody uses it. So I'm asking for it now, especially from GNOME and KDE users running PulseAudio. I'll just add feedback that I do no

Re: [arch-general] PulseAudio in [testing]

2010-11-26 Thread Yaro Kasear
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 09:17 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 18:46 -0600, Yaro Kasear wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 21:34 +0100, Jan Steffens wrote: > > > I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no > > > feedback on this. > > > > > > This either means it wo

Re: [arch-general] PulseAudio in [testing]

2010-11-26 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 21:34 +0100, Jan Steffens wrote: > I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no > feedback on this. > > This either means it works well, or nobody uses it. > > So I'm asking for it now, especially from GNOME and KDE users running > PulseAudio. Smallish

Re: [arch-general] PulseAudio in [testing]

2010-11-26 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 18:46 -0600, Yaro Kasear wrote: > On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 21:34 +0100, Jan Steffens wrote: > > I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no > > feedback on this. > > > > This either means it works well, or nobody uses it. > > > > So I'm asking for it now,

Re: [arch-general] PulseAudio in [testing]

2010-11-26 Thread Yaro Kasear
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 21:34 +0100, Jan Steffens wrote: > I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no > feedback on this. > > This either means it works well, or nobody uses it. > > So I'm asking for it now, especially from GNOME and KDE users running > PulseAudio. I haven't

Re: [arch-general] PulseAudio in [testing]

2010-11-26 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 21:34 +0100, Jan Steffens wrote: > I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no > feedback on this. > > This either means it works well, or nobody uses it. > > So I'm asking for it now, especially from GNOME and KDE users running > PulseAudio. Been usin

Re: [arch-general] PulseAudio in [testing]

2010-11-26 Thread Δημακάκος Δημάκης
Στις Παρασκευή 26 Νοέμβριος 2010 22:34:18 Jan Steffens γράψατε: > I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no > feedback on this. > > This either means it works well, or nobody uses it. > > So I'm asking for it now, especially from GNOME and KDE users running > PulseAudio.

Re: [arch-general] PulseAudio in [testing]

2010-11-26 Thread Ignacio Galmarino
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Jan Steffens wrote: > I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no > feedback on this. > > This either means it works well, or nobody uses it. > > So I'm asking for it now, especially from GNOME and KDE users running > PulseAudio. > It is work

Re: [arch-general] PulseAudio in [testing]

2010-11-26 Thread Anarconda
So far so good. Testing enabled and KDE. El 26/11/2010 21:34, "Jan Steffens" escribió: > I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no > feedback on this. > > This either means it works well, or nobody uses it. > > So I'm asking for it now, especially from GNOME and KDE users r

Re: [arch-general] PulseAudio in [testing]

2010-11-26 Thread Seblu
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Jan Steffens wrote: > I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no > feedback on this. > > This either means it works well, or nobody uses it. > It work perfectly for me on awesome with gnome-volume-control-applet. Thanks! -- Sébastien Luttr

Re: [arch-general] PulseAudio in [testing]

2010-11-26 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 21:34:18 +0100, Jan Steffens wrote: > I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no > feedback on this. > > This either means it works well, or nobody uses it. > > So I'm asking for it now, especially from GNOME and KDE users running > PulseAudio. I teste

[arch-general] PulseAudio in [testing]

2010-11-26 Thread Jan Steffens
I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no feedback on this. This either means it works well, or nobody uses it. So I'm asking for it now, especially from GNOME and KDE users running PulseAudio.

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] xfsprogs-3.1.4-1

2010-11-26 Thread Uli Armbruster
On 11/25/10 at 09:44pm, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi bump to latest version, > > please signoff both arches, > thanks > greetings > tpowa > > -- > Tobias Powalowski > Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) > http://www.archlinux.org > tp...@archlinux.org Signoff i686, everything's fi

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel 2.6.36.1-3

2010-11-26 Thread Jan de Groot
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 18:36 -0600, David C. Rankin wrote: > Tobias, > > You'da Man! kernel26 2.6.36.1-3 boot FINE on that whacky MSI based box. > I don't > know if you know what changed, but if so, I'm dying to find out. After running > it by the Redhat dmraid (dm-devel) list, the kernel.or

[arch-general] [signoff] wireless-regdb 2010.11.24-1

2010-11-26 Thread Thomas Bächler
Upstream update, please sign off. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature