On 21/11/10 14:08, mwnn wrote:
Hi all,
After capturing a random number of packets, the new wireshark-1.4.2
stops capturing packets.
Bug reports work best going to the bug tracker and supplying more details.
Allan
Hi all,
After capturing a random number of packets, the new wireshark-1.4.2
stops capturing packets.
Regards,
mwnn
Hi all,
I've fixed most (~14) of the bugs from flyspray for netcfg. I have not
implemented any feature requests yet.
The code is available here:
git://github.com/iphitus/netcfg-updates.git
PKGBUILD and package here:
http://rayner.id.au/~iphitus/netcfg-git/
I have yet to test many of them, but
On 11/20/2010 05:27 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Hi,
while reviewing the core rebuild list I wondered if we should think
about chaining our default boot loader. Note: that wont affect existing
setups and people will still be able to use whatever they like.
ATM. we have grub1 in core/base and insta
On Nov 20, 2010, at 9:38 AM, "Lukáš Jirkovský"
wrote:
> On 20 November 2010 15:25, Heiko Baums wrote:
>> Am Sat, 20 Nov 2010 11:27:35 +0100
>> schrieb Pierre Schmitz :
>>
>>> ATM. we have grub1 in core/base and install that by default. The
>>> problem is that this project is virtually dead for a
On 20 November 2010 15:25, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Sat, 20 Nov 2010 11:27:35 +0100
> schrieb Pierre Schmitz :
>
>> ATM. we have grub1 in core/base and install that by default. The
>> problem is that this project is virtually dead for a long time now and
>> also not available on x86_64. Technically
On 20-11-2010 15:15, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Sat, 20 Nov 2010 15:38:33 +0100
> schrieb Thomas Bächler :
>
>> I don't think it's a good idea to maintain that many bootloaders in
>> core. grub-legacy is unmaintained, lilo has a very old-school design
>> and major disadvantages. We could keep grub2,
Am Sat, 20 Nov 2010 15:38:33 +0100
schrieb Thomas Bächler :
> I don't think it's a good idea to maintain that many bootloaders in
> core. grub-legacy is unmaintained, lilo has a very old-school design
> and major disadvantages. We could keep grub2, but it seems it isn't
> really stable yet.
That'
Am 20.11.2010 15:25, schrieb Heiko Baums:
> Am Sat, 20 Nov 2010 11:27:35 +0100
> schrieb Pierre Schmitz :
>
>> ATM. we have grub1 in core/base and install that by default. The
>> problem is that this project is virtually dead for a long time now and
>> also not available on x86_64. Technically it
On 21/11/10 00:25, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Sat, 20 Nov 2010 11:27:35 +0100
schrieb Pierre Schmitz:
ATM. we have grub1 in core/base and install that by default. The
problem is that this project is virtually dead for a long time now and
also not available on x86_64. Technically it has to be in the
Am Sat, 20 Nov 2010 11:27:35 +0100
schrieb Pierre Schmitz :
> ATM. we have grub1 in core/base and install that by default. The
> problem is that this project is virtually dead for a long time now and
> also not available on x86_64. Technically it has to be in the multilib
> repo.
I'm running a x8
11 matches
Mail list logo
