Re: [arch-general] mirror.rit.edu/kdemod/archive/ -- dropped, does it exist anywhere else?

2010-11-16 Thread David C. Rankin
On 11/15/2010 10:28 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > - kdemod3 has been dead for ages Gone -- but not forgotten :p [157k] http://www.3111skyline.com/dl/Archlinux/compiz/arch+kde3+compiz.jpg -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (93

Re: [arch-general] C++ program compiliation failed

2010-11-16 Thread Magnus Therning
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 16:10, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote: > On 11/16/2010 08:54 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote: >> >> I'm absolutely stunned now when the same program (inlined constructors) >> compiles now, without ANY change in the gcc flags, etc. >> >> Probably the CPU had got heated up that day

Re: [arch-general] [rc.d/network] Integrate wpa_supplicant as wireless framework?

2010-11-16 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 16.11.2010 16:33, schrieb Gerhard Brauer: > Yes, also together with net-auto-wired it works fine. I'm only not > sure if i use network-profile seperate configs or better go with > wireless-wpa-config ("static" /e/wpa_supplicant.conf) cause i often > use wpa_gui with option to update the config.

Re: [arch-general] C++ program compiliation failed

2010-11-16 Thread Nilesh Govindarajan
On 11/16/2010 08:54 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote: I'm absolutely stunned now when the same program (inlined constructors) compiles now, without ANY change in the gcc flags, etc. Probably the CPU had got heated up that day lol. The problem has come back again. Well anyways, let's close this t

Re: [arch-general] [rc.d/network] Integrate wpa_supplicant as wireless framework?

2010-11-16 Thread Gerhard Brauer
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 10:42:16PM +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 09.11.2010 14:55, schrieb Gerhard Brauer: > > Hi, > > Hi Gerhard, it is nice to hear from you after such a long time :) Yeah, no more R.I.P (rest in pieces), or: "Auferstanden aus Ruinen..." ;-) > > > our current default wirele

Re: [arch-general] C++ program compiliation failed

2010-11-16 Thread Nilesh Govindarajan
I'm absolutely stunned now when the same program (inlined constructors) compiles now, without ANY change in the gcc flags, etc. Probably the CPU had got heated up that day lol. -- Regards, Nilesh Govindarajan Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/nilesh.gr Twitter: http://twitter.com/nileshgr Websi

Re: [arch-general] C++ program compiliation failed

2010-11-16 Thread Nilesh Govindarajan
On 11/15/2010 10:17 PM, Magnus Therning wrote: On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 13:00, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote: On 11/14/2010 11:29 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote: Hi, I have three c++ files: main.cpp, and querystring.{h,cpp} Guys, thanks for your suggestion, but the problem turned out to be inlin

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Inappropriate bugtracker behavior

2010-11-16 Thread Emmanuel Benisty
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Heiko Baums wrote: > Am Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:53:36 +0700 > schrieb Emmanuel Benisty : > >> Please ask the guy the same question. > > I probably would if I knew who it was or which bugs are affected. So I > don't know if he is really just insulting - of course there

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Inappropriate bugtracker behavior

2010-11-16 Thread Emmanuel Benisty
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > On 11/16/2010 01:53 PM, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: >> >> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Heiko Baums >>  wrote: >>> >>> Am Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:19:16 +0700 >>> schrieb Emmanuel Benisty: >>> > ban him, who cares? a random guy on the internets ye

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Inappropriate bugtracker behavior

2010-11-16 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:53:36 +0700 schrieb Emmanuel Benisty : > Please ask the guy the same question. I probably would if I knew who it was or which bugs are affected. So I don't know if he is really just insulting - of course there are such people - or if he has a reason to be angry. I had some

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Inappropriate bugtracker behavior

2010-11-16 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 11/16/2010 01:53 PM, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Heiko Baums wrote: Am Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:19:16 +0700 schrieb Emmanuel Benisty: ban him, who cares? a random guy on the internets yelling at people doing stuff for free? seriously? trash his account, let him use

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Inappropriate bugtracker behavior

2010-11-16 Thread Emmanuel Benisty
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Heiko Baums wrote: > Am Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:19:16 +0700 > schrieb Emmanuel Benisty : > >> > ban him, who cares? a random guy on the internets yelling at people >> > doing stuff for free? seriously? trash his account, let him use >> > another distro. > > Are you rea

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Inappropriate bugtracker behavior

2010-11-16 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:19:16 +0700 schrieb Emmanuel Benisty : > > ban him, who cares? a random guy on the internets yelling at people > > doing stuff for free? seriously? trash his account, let him use > > another distro. Are you really sure that this is a good attitude and an appropriate behavio

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Inappropriate bugtracker behavior

2010-11-16 Thread Emmanuel Benisty
yeah, wrong list... On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 2:10 PM, RedShift wrote: >> Someone (which shall remain nameless unless privately asked) on the >> bugtracker has been demonstrating inappropriate behavior. This includes, but >> not limited to

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Inappropriate bugtracker behavior

2010-11-16 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Tue, 16 Nov 2010 08:10:03 +0100 schrieb RedShift : > Someone (which shall remain nameless unless privately asked) on the > bugtracker has been demonstrating inappropriate behavior. This > includes, but not limited to: > > * Insulting developers for not accepting certain bugs > * Insulting anyo