At Sonntag, 14. November 2010 22:07 Eric Bélanger wrote:
> There's already RSS feeds with that information (maybe not as compact
> as you want) :
>
> http://aur.archlinux.org/rss.php
> http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/packages/?op=rss&isdir=1
> http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/community/?op=rss&isd
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 00:08 -0500, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> On (11/15/10 09:05), Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> -~> On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 14:39 -0500, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> -~> > On (11/14/10 14:05), Isaac Dupree wrote:
> -~> > -~> On 11/14/10 09:32, Jim Pryor wrote:
> -~> > -~> >...
> -~> > -~> >
> -~> > -~> >I
On (11/15/10 09:05), Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
-~> On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 14:39 -0500, Leonid Isaev wrote:
-~> > On (11/14/10 14:05), Isaac Dupree wrote:
-~> > -~> On 11/14/10 09:32, Jim Pryor wrote:
-~> > -~> >...
-~> > -~> >
-~> > -~> >I would certainly understand and could not reasonably object to any
-~>
On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 14:39 -0500, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> On (11/14/10 14:05), Isaac Dupree wrote:
> -~> On 11/14/10 09:32, Jim Pryor wrote:
> -~> >...
> -~> >
> -~> >I would certainly understand and could not reasonably object to any
> -~> >distro's demoting dcron to an unofficial package. But as I
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Upstream bugfix update - the release announcement explicitly mentions
> this one:
>
> "Fixed problem with special case route targets ('remote_host'), which
> could cause filling of the routing table with random garbage. Thanks to
> Teodo MIC
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 3:01 AM, Attila wrote:
> At Samstag, 13. November 2010 17:32 Heiko Baums wrote:
>
>> And I have nothing against cleaning up a repo. But this should be done
>> more considered. Means only unimportant, unpopular packages or packages
>> which don't run anymore should be moved
On (11/14/10 14:05), Isaac Dupree wrote:
-~> On 11/14/10 09:32, Jim Pryor wrote:
-~> >...
-~> >
-~> >I would certainly understand and could not reasonably object to any
-~> >distro's demoting dcron to an unofficial package. But as I said, I I
-~> >will fix dcron anyway, I hope within the very near
On 14/11/10 18:34, Frank Thieme wrote:
> On Sunday 14 November 2010 19:27:01 Magnus Therning wrote:
>> Order is important. I think he'd have more luck with the last line
>> changed to
>>
>> g++ -o out querystring.o main.o
>
> Is it? I must have slipped my mind...
Yes, in the link step it is, sin
On 11/14/10 09:32, Jim Pryor wrote:
...
I would certainly understand and could not reasonably object to any
distro's demoting dcron to an unofficial package. But as I said, I I
will fix dcron anyway, I hope within the very near future. I'll announce
here when I believe the git version has the ne
On Sunday 14 November 2010 19:27:01 Magnus Therning wrote:
> Order is important. I think he'd have more luck with the last line
> changed to
>
> g++ -o out querystring.o main.o
Is it? I must have slipped my mind...
I usually use cmake or some other makefile, so I don't have to type these
line
On 14/11/10 18:24, Frank Thieme wrote:
> On Sunday 14 November 2010 18:59:28 Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
>> How am I supposed to compile the program? i.e. in general a multifile
>> program having .hs and .cpps
>
> I should work the way you did. I guess you have an error in your source code.
>
> The
On 14/11/10 17:59, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> Hi,
> I have three c++ files: main.cpp, and querystring.{h,cpp}
>
> querystring.h contains the definition for the QueryString class
> and querystring.cpp contains the implementation.
>
> querystring.cpp and main.cpp both have the statement #include "q
On Sunday 14 November 2010 18:59:28 Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> How am I supposed to compile the program? i.e. in general a multifile
> program having .hs and .cpps
I should work the way you did. I guess you have an error in your source code.
The oder method would be:
g++ -c main.cpp
g++ -c que
Hi,
I have three c++ files: main.cpp, and querystring.{h,cpp}
querystring.h contains the definition for the QueryString class
and querystring.cpp contains the implementation.
querystring.cpp and main.cpp both have the statement #include "querystring.h"
Now when I run the compiler, I get a weird
Hi all, I'm the dcron maintainer. I've replied to a few users who emailed me
privately, but I wasn't aware of this thread until now.
I agree it's ridiculous to have a cron daemon that can't keep time! I'm
sorry I haven't been able to keep up maintenance properly. I'm a
chronically over-committed
At Samstag, 13. November 2010 17:32 Heiko Baums wrote:
> And I have nothing against cleaning up a repo. But this should be done
> more considered. Means only unimportant, unpopular packages or packages
> which don't run anymore should be moved to AUR or removed completely but
> not packages which
16 matches
Mail list logo
