On 11/01/2010 04:56 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> These error are semi-random, they probably depend on where the kernel
> and initramfs files are physically located in the file system. It seems
> that about every second kernel works for you.
>
> Grub (and all other bootloaders for that matter) use B
On 11/01/2010 04:01 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Have you made a complete system update with pacman -Syu and
> particularly updated lvm2 in case you are using this?
>
> Heiko
>
Thanks Heiko,
Yes, I've done the complete system update with pacman -Syu. (don't use
lvm2,
but yes it was updated
2010/11/1 Ng Oon-Ee
> On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 22:42 -0400, Matthew Monaco wrote:
> > On 11/01/2010 10:37 PM, Jason Reardon wrote:
> > > I'm somewhat of a mailing list lurker. I've read before that one thing
> Arch
> > > is lacking in are normal users testing packages. So, I wrote a script
> to
> >
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 10:43:03PM -0400, David Campbell wrote:
> Excerpts from Matthew Monaco's message of 2010-11-01 18:59:25 -0400:
> > On 10/27/2010 04:55 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> > > Nov. 15-23 I'll be away (I'll be in NY city)
> > >
> > > If any Arch dev/user is in the area during that t
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 22:42 -0400, Matthew Monaco wrote:
> On 11/01/2010 10:37 PM, Jason Reardon wrote:
> > I'm somewhat of a mailing list lurker. I've read before that one thing Arch
> > is lacking in are normal users testing packages. So, I wrote a script to
> > install packages from testing when
Excerpts from Matthew Monaco's message of 2010-11-01 18:59:25 -0400:
> On 10/27/2010 04:55 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> > Nov. 15-23 I'll be away (I'll be in NY city)
> >
> > If any Arch dev/user is in the area during that time, let me know, we
> > could hook up.
> >
> > Dieter
> >
>
> I work in R
On 11/01/2010 10:37 PM, Jason Reardon wrote:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
On 02/11/10 12:19, Jason Reardon wrote:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Gaetan Bisson
wrote:
[2010-11-01 19:26:31 +1000] Allan McRae:
db-5.1.19-2
heimdal-1.3.3-2
iproute2-2.3.25-2
libsasl
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 02/11/10 12:19, Jason Reardon wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Gaetan Bisson
>> wrote:
>>
>> [2010-11-01 19:26:31 +1000] Allan McRae:
>>>
db-5.1.19-2
heimdal-1.3.3-2
iproute2-2.3.25-2
libsasl-2.1.23-5
p
On 02/11/10 12:19, Jason Reardon wrote:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
[2010-11-01 19:26:31 +1000] Allan McRae:
db-5.1.19-2
heimdal-1.3.3-2
iproute2-2.3.25-2
libsasl-2.1.23-5
pam-1.1.1-2
perl-5.12.1-3
signoff i686
--
Gaetan
I installed db from testing. Now when I
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> [2010-11-01 19:26:31 +1000] Allan McRae:
> > db-5.1.19-2
> > heimdal-1.3.3-2
> > iproute2-2.3.25-2
> > libsasl-2.1.23-5
> > pam-1.1.1-2
> > perl-5.12.1-3
>
> signoff i686
>
> --
> Gaetan
>
I installed db from testing. Now when I run `pacman
On 10/27/2010 04:55 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
Nov. 15-23 I'll be away (I'll be in NY city)
If any Arch dev/user is in the area during that time, let me know, we
could hook up.
Dieter
I work in Rockefeller Center (49th and 6th).
Anyone else?
On 11/01/2010 02:47 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Hi guys,
please signoff 2.6.36 series for both arches
and give feedback if
real issues arise.
I had a problem with .34 which was fixed in .35 and started reappearing in .36.
When resuming from suspend, I would often not get video back, I have a
Am 01.11.2010 21:35, schrieb David C. Rankin:
> On 11/01/2010 03:22 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
>> We'll see what the dmraid devs have to say. This seems to only effect my
>> jmicron
>> controller based box. The other boxes seem OK. So maybe it's a firware dmraid
>> error that gets tripped dependin
Am Mon, 01 Nov 2010 15:35:56 -0500
schrieb "David C. Rankin" :
> On 11/01/2010 03:22 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> > We'll see what the dmraid devs have to say. This seems to only
> > effect my jmicron controller based box. The other boxes seem OK. So
> > maybe it's a firware dmraid error that gets
On 11/01/2010 03:22 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> We'll see what the dmraid devs have to say. This seems to only effect my
> jmicron
> controller based box. The other boxes seem OK. So maybe it's a firware dmraid
> error that gets tripped depending the way the kernel loads the dmraid module??
> Who
On 11/01/2010 01:39 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Well i'm not sure what error 24 is, but dmraid can be really complicated.
> I would recommend you write the dmraid authors from fedora, i'm sure it's a
> grub vs. dmraid issue which we cannot solve.
>
> greetings
> tpowa
Will do and I'll report
Am Mon, 1 Nov 2010 19:39:18 +0100
schrieb Tobias Powalowski :
> Am Montag 01 November 2010 schrieb David C. Rankin:
> > On 10/31/2010 04:32 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> > > Am 31.10.2010 22:00, schrieb David C. Rankin:
> > >> >Updated an x86_64 box to 2.6.35.8-1 and the boot hangs
> > >> >
Hi guys,
please signoff 2.6.36 series for both arches
and give feedback if
real issues arise.
Upstream
changes:
http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges
Features included:
- Tomoyo support:
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/21533
- Apparmor support:
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/21533
- Build RTC
Am Montag 01 November 2010 schrieb David C. Rankin:
> On 10/31/2010 04:32 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> > Am 31.10.2010 22:00, schrieb David C. Rankin:
> >> > Updated an x86_64 box to 2.6.35.8-1 and the boot hangs at the very
> >> > start with
> >> >
> >> > the following error:
> >> >
> >> > Boot
On 10/31/2010 04:32 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 31.10.2010 22:00, schrieb David C. Rankin:
>> >Updated an x86_64 box to 2.6.35.8-1 and the boot hangs at the very
>> > start with
>> > the following error:
>> >
>> > Booting 'Arch Linux on Archangel'
>> >
>> > root (hd1,5)
>> > Filesystem
On 01.11.2010 16:25, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> On Monday 01 November 2010 14:38:23 Florian Pritz wrote:
>> +if [ -x "rebuild" ]; then
>> + ./rebuild
>> +else
>> + makepkg
>> +fi
> Which official script is named 'rebuild'?
> And, this script does not use a chroot to build the package!
Because ever
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 16:25 +0100, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> On Monday 01 November 2010 14:38:23 Florian Pritz wrote:
> > +if [ -x "rebuild" ]; then
> > + ./rebuild
> > +else
> > + makepkg
> > +fi
> Which official script is named 'rebuild'?
> And, this script does not use a chroot to build the pac
On Monday 01 November 2010 14:38:23 Florian Pritz wrote:
> +if [ -x "rebuild" ]; then
> + ./rebuild
> +else
> + makepkg
> +fi
Which official script is named 'rebuild'?
And, this script does not use a chroot to build the package!
--
Andrea Scarpino
Arch Linux Developer
Signed-off-by: Florian Pritz
---
upgpkg | 44
1 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 upgpkg
diff --git a/upgpkg b/upgpkg
new file mode 100755
index 000..7966ac3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/upgpkg
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+#!/bin/b
24 matches
Mail list logo
