Guys,
In the past I have set up 'dial-in' servers in my home to share the
cable
internet connection when I'm at sites with no internet connections. This has
worked great for years on SuSE. The way it works is:
___ _
| other box
I personally never liked the OpenOffice.org moniker. Always felt like it was
too long and just plain ugly.
On Sep 29, 2010 3:48 PM, "Jeff Cook" wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Guus Snijders
wrote:
>> On 29-09-10 05:24, David C. Rankin wrote:
>>>
>>> Guys,
>>>
>>> For those that rely o
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 18:22 -0600, J. W. Birdsong wrote:
> On 09/29/10 at 10:44pm, b1 wrote:
> > Hello altogether
> >
> > Today I ran into the following problem:
> > When I try to connect to an ftp Server via the "connect to Server
> > Dialog" in Nautilus, the ftp Server gets mounted. Unfortunatel
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Fess wrote:
> On 06:52 Wed 29 Sep , Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 14:44 -0700, John Holbrook wrote:
>> > Thanks. I just found it in testing. Install fixed my problem. Very
>> > frustrating though.
>>
>> Kernel updates always go through [testing] first.
successful reboot today
> is here:
>
> [63k]
> http://www.3111skyline.com/dl/Archlinux/bugs/everything-20100929.log.bz2
>
> or
>
> [1M - but should be delivered compressed by apache2 anyway]
> http://www.3111skyline.com/dl/Archlinux/bugs/everything-20100929.log
On 09/29/10 at 10:44pm, b1 wrote:
> Hello altogether
>
> Today I ran into the following problem:
> When I try to connect to an ftp Server via the "connect to Server
> Dialog" in Nautilus, the ftp Server gets mounted. Unfortunatelly there
> are no files in the newly created mountpoint. I also looke
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 00:31 +0300, Cristopher Thomas wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:39, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> > PS: hundreds of people are following this mailing list, so every mail
> > you send ends up in all those peoples mailboxes, maybe you can restrict
> > your emails to the more use
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 14:04 -0600, Gary Wright wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Fess wrote:
> > On 06:52 Wed 29 Sep , Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 14:44 -0700, John Holbrook wrote:
> >> > Thanks. I just found it in testing. Install fixed my problem. Very
> >> > frustrating
Hi,
On 2010-09-29 at 18:26 Facundo Andrés Bianco wrote:
>2010/9/29 Christian :
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2010-09-29 at 18:07 Facundo Andrés Bianco wrote:
>>
>>>2010/9/29 Christian :
Hi all,
I haven't been using Archlinux for that long so I apologize for the
>>>questions. I have been using Pro
atavistic issue described previously with 2.6.35.5-1. that appeared fixed
in 2.6.35.6-1 but strikes back in 2.6.35.7-1.
everything.log showing both failed init on 9/27 and successful reboot today is
here:
[63k]
http://www.3111skyline.com/dl/Archlinux/bugs/everything-20100929.log.bz2
or
[1M
On 09/29/2010 09:30 AM, John Holbrook wrote:
> I know a fork can be a pain but why do you say "Ugh"?
>
> When the project was under Sun they maintained way too tight of
> control over everything and they really didn't get the whole Open
> Source philosophy.
>
> Under Oracle? Well, we've seen what
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:39, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> PS: hundreds of people are following this mailing list, so every mail
> you send ends up in all those peoples mailboxes, maybe you can restrict
> your emails to the more useful stuff.
As you clearly see this as an obscene transgression and
2010/9/29 Christian :
>
>
>
> On 2010-09-29 at 18:07 Facundo Andrés Bianco wrote:
>
>>2010/9/29 Christian :
>>> Hi all,
>>> I haven't been using Archlinux for that long so I apologize for the
>>questions. I have been using ProFTPD on Debian and that was running as
>>it's own user and that was set
Excerpts from Dieter Plaetinck's message of 2010-09-29 09:39:07 +0200:
> On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 22:24:36 -0500
> "David C. Rankin" wrote:
>
> > Guys,
> >
> > For those that rely on OpenOffice, and for those that prepare
> > the packages, it's official, OpenOffice forked as of Sept. 28, 2010.
>
On 2010-09-29 at 18:07 Facundo Andrés Bianco wrote:
>2010/9/29 Christian :
>> Hi all,
>> I haven't been using Archlinux for that long so I apologize for the
>questions. I have been using ProFTPD on Debian and that was running as
>it's own user and that was set up automatically, but I don't fin
2010/9/29 Christian :
> Hi all,
> I haven't been using Archlinux for that long so I apologize for the
> questions. I have been using ProFTPD on Debian and that was running as it's
> own user and that was set up automatically, but I don't find any instructions
> on the Arch wiki to set up proftpd
Hi all,
I haven't been using Archlinux for that long so I apologize for the questions.
I have been using ProFTPD on Debian and that was running as it's own user and
that was set up automatically, but I don't find any instructions on the Arch
wiki to set up proftpd, only a description of it. Any
Hello altogether
Today I ran into the following problem:
When I try to connect to an ftp Server via the "connect to Server
Dialog" in Nautilus, the ftp Server gets mounted. Unfortunatelly there
are no files in the newly created mountpoint. I also looked manually in
the .gvfs/FTPSERVERNAME/ Directo
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Fess wrote:
> On 06:52 Wed 29 Sep , Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 14:44 -0700, John Holbrook wrote:
>> > Thanks. I just found it in testing. Install fixed my problem. Very
>> > frustrating though.
>>
>> Kernel updates always go through [testing] first.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Guus Snijders wrote:
> On 29-09-10 05:24, David C. Rankin wrote:
>>
>> Guys,
>>
>> For those that rely on OpenOffice, and for those that prepare the
>> packages, it's official, OpenOffice forked as of Sept. 28, 2010. Here
>> is the press release:
>>
>> http://www.
On 06:52 Wed 29 Sep , Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 14:44 -0700, John Holbrook wrote:
> > Thanks. I just found it in testing. Install fixed my problem. Very
> > frustrating though.
>
> Kernel updates always go through [testing] first.
Last 2 or 3 new kernels brought us pain.
Maybe deve
Hi,
On 2010-09-29 at 18:28 Paulo Santos wrote:
>If you install the dependencies of the AUR's package [1] you should be
>able to compile it yourself from source.
>
>If you want DAHDI, you should install it before Asterisk so it detects
>it and compiles the channel drivers.
>
>[1] http://aur.arch
On 29-09-10 05:24, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
For those that rely on OpenOffice, and for those that prepare the
packages, it's official, OpenOffice forked as of Sept. 28, 2010. Here
is the press release:
http://www.documentfoundation.org/contact/tdf_release.html
Thanks David, i had seen the
Christian wrote:
> OK, what will I need to compile it fro msource on Arch?
> I have been trying to do it, but no luck.
If you install the dependencies of the AUR's package [1] you should be
able to compile it yourself from source.
If you want DAHDI, you should install it before Asterisk so it det
Hi,
On 2010-09-29 at 17:03 Paulo Santos wrote:
>Christian wrote:
>> Souns great! Did you install it from the aur or from the source?
>
>At first I tried the AUR version. Now I use one built from source so I
>could cusomize, also with DAHDI, without any problems.
>
>Florian Pritz wrote:
>> Please
Christian wrote:
> Souns great! Did you install it from the aur or from the source?
At first I tried the AUR version. Now I use one built from source so I
could cusomize, also with DAHDI, without any problems.
Florian Pritz wrote:
> Please make sure your mail client adds the Message-ID header to
On 29.09.2010 16:45, Christian wrote:
> Hi,
> Souns great! Did you install it from the aur or from the source?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Paulo Santos
> Sent: den 29 september 2010 15:37
> To: General Discussion about Arch Linux
> Subject: Re: [arch-general] Asterisk on Archlinux
>
Hi,
Souns great! Did you install it from the aur or from the source?
-Original Message-
From: Paulo Santos
Sent: den 29 september 2010 15:37
To: General Discussion about Arch Linux
Subject: Re: [arch-general] Asterisk on Archlinux
Christian wrote:
> Is anyone on this list running the la
I know a fork can be a pain but why do you say "Ugh"?
When the project was under Sun they maintained way too tight of
control over everything and they really didn't get the whole Open
Source philosophy.
Under Oracle? Well, we've seen what they've done with OpenSolaris
I think that Oracle is
Christian wrote:
> Is anyone on this list running the latest Asteriisk with or without dahdi?
I'm running Asterisk 1.6 with DAHDI 2.4. Works perfectly.
Hi all,
Is anyone on this list running the latest Asteriisk with or without dahdi?
Many thanks,
Christian
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:41:20 +0300, Ionu?^? Bîru
wrote:
> use abs to recompile mplayer against x264-git
That would be a good solution for most packages but in this case you
should be aware that:
- x264 is used only for video encoding, not decoding, so unless you
encode videos you simply do
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:08, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Latest kernel is in testing,
> please signoff for both arches.
Booted successfully via pv-grub under Xen.
Sign off x86_64.
--
Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
Latest kernel is in testing,
please signoff for both arches.
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias
Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer
(tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 22:24:36 -0500
"David C. Rankin" wrote:
> Guys,
>
> For those that rely on OpenOffice, and for those that prepare
> the packages, it's official, OpenOffice forked as of Sept. 28, 2010.
> Here is the press release:
>
> http://www.documentfoundation.org/contact/tdf_relea
35 matches
Mail list logo
