> I find it interesting that upstream made a change/addition just to
> accommodate for one distribution. Usually it's the distro that patches
> things for their own benefit.
>
>
Sorry. That was me.
> On 9/7/2010 1:22 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
>> Guys,
>>
>> Got the sudo update with the new sudoers file, Noticed new %sudo group
>> designation along with the traditional %wheel:
>>
>> ## Uncomment to allow members of group sudo to execute any command
>> # %sudo ALL=(ALL) ALL
>>
>>
>> Any reason
On 9/7/2010 1:22 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
Got the sudo update with the new sudoers file, Noticed new %sudo group
designation along with the traditional %wheel:
## Uncomment to allow members of group sudo to execute any command
# %sudo ALL=(ALL) ALL
Any reason that we would want a sudo
On 9/7/2010 9:25 PM, Mario Figueiredo wrote:
As far as users (administrators) are concerned, the wheel group can be
named anything and nobody will care. Those who still want to use the
name "wheel" just need to change the sudoers file. And that's why this
change was so unnecessary. An historic an
>> Fair enough, if enabling the xcb backend slows things down, especially
>> if it is unmaintained so not likely to improve soon, we should remove
>> it.
>> It's a shame that awesome has to go but I'm sure the people using
>> awesome know how to handle building from AUR/ABS and create a
>> xcb-enab
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> anyone knows this? http://bugseverywhere.org/be/show/HomePage
>
> the concept looks great, although i don't know anything about the
> implementation/usage.
There's quite a few things out there with this same idea:
- Ditz (http://ditz.ru
---
rc.sysinit |3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rc.sysinit b/rc.sysinit
index f7df48c..bee4efb 100755
--- a/rc.sysinit
+++ b/rc.sysinit
@@ -276,8 +276,7 @@ stat_busy "Removing Leftover Files"
: >| /var/run/utmp
/bin/chmod 0664 /var/run/utmp
# Keep {x,k,
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Philipp Überbacher
wrote:
> Excerpts from Dieter Plaetinck's message of 2010-09-08 21:47:40 +0200:
>> anyone knows this? http://bugseverywhere.org/be/show/HomePage
>>
>> the concept looks great, although i don't know anything about the
>> implementation/usage.
>>
>>
Excerpts from Dieter Plaetinck's message of 2010-09-08 21:47:40 +0200:
> anyone knows this? http://bugseverywhere.org/be/show/HomePage
>
> the concept looks great, although i don't know anything about the
> implementation/usage.
>
> other then the advantages they list, I think something like this
anyone knows this? http://bugseverywhere.org/be/show/HomePage
the concept looks great, although i don't know anything about the
implementation/usage.
other then the advantages they list, I think something like this can be
useful for downstream<->upstream communication. (ie someone reports a
bug i
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> I have an OpenVZ VPS running arch.
> For some reason pacman is superslow, and I'm not allowed to create/use
> loopback devices.
> pacman-optimize takes nearly 5 minutes per run, no matter the last run
> was just a minute ago.
Unhelpful
I have an OpenVZ VPS running arch.
For some reason pacman is superslow, and I'm not allowed to create/use
loopback devices.
pacman-optimize takes nearly 5 minutes per run, no matter the last run
was just a minute ago.
--
Regards,
Nilesh Govindarajan
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/nilesh.gr
Twi
On 09/08/2010 11:57 AM, Matthew Monaco wrote:
>
> Thank you kindly. I could have sworn the camera used to show up as
> /dev/sdX onto /media/*. But it's been so long at this point I could just
> be mistaken.
>
Is there any configuration option in your camera that allows you to
change how it ident
On 09/08/2010 05:37 AM, Christoffer Hirth wrote:
Matthew Monaco wrote:
I can get my digital camera to work with libgphoto stuff like shotwell, but
for months now it simply won't show up as a mass storage device. Am I missing
a kernel module or something? I loaded usb-storage.
I downloaded the U
Nilesh Govindarajan writes:
> On 09/04/2010 10:51 AM, Ashish SHUKLA wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> When I connect to my remote SFTP server (running FreeBSD) using GNOME
>> Nautilus, I noticed that the in the "Permissions" dialog box, instead of
>> user/group names, the numeric U/G IDs are being show
Matthew Monaco wrote:
I can get my digital camera to work with libgphoto stuff like
shotwell, but for months now it simply won't show up as a mass storage
device. Am I missing a kernel module or something? I loaded usb-storage.
I downloaded the Ubuntu 10.10 beta live CD, plugged the camera in,
Am 08.09.2010 06:16, schrieb Victor Lowther:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Dave Reisner wrote:
>> Instead of checking for the existance of a file in /var/run/daemons on
>> every iteration, handle the null case by setting nullglob. The shopt
>> call is done inside a subshell as to not bother t
Am 08.09.2010 06:07, schrieb Victor Lowther:
> Blame my ongoing Emacs education. I learned about
> (custom-set-variables '(indent-tabs-mode nil)) after doing most of the
> work, and dropped the whitespace cleanup patches due to size.
>
> Otherwise, I ignored the vim modelines -- 2 characters per i
18 matches
Mail list logo
