Guys,
Got the sudo update with the new sudoers file, Noticed new %sudo group
designation along with the traditional %wheel:
## Uncomment to allow members of group sudo to execute any command
# %sudo ALL=(ALL) ALL
Any reason that we would want a sudo group instead of using wheel?
--
Dav
Hello! If NETWORK_PERSIST=yes (in /etc/rc.conf) i can't stop/restart network
daemon:
:: Skipping Network Shutdown
against
:: Stopping Network
It's seems not good
On 09/06/2010 05:20 PM, Mauro Santos wrote:
Sorry to double post but as you can see my reply clearly does not apply
to the invisible scan but to deleted/blocked detection, my mistake.
However it may be possible that invisible detection may stop working
reliably in the future too.
No problem. T
On 09/06/2010 11:17 PM, Mauro Santos wrote:
> Mind you that since some time ago it seems this "feature" is not
> reliable anymore.
>
> The are msn clients that had this functionality built-in and things have
> gone south when it started to malfunction and reporting some users as
> being blocked or
Mind you that since some time ago it seems this "feature" is not
reliable anymore.
The are msn clients that had this functionality built-in and things have
gone south when it started to malfunction and reporting some users as
being blocked or deleted when in fact they are not.
As far as I know no
On 08/28/2010 12:24 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
MSN & Yahoo invisible scanners
Dunno, don't use either, but I was curious enough to take a look and see what
the heck it was anyway. Here is the article that gave me the best background on
at least what the visible/invisible debate was about.
On 09/06/2010 01:47 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 06.09.2010 21:30, schrieb jwbirdsong:
>> On 09/06/2010 11:29 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>>> Upstream update, please sign off.
>>>
>>
>> Can still boot to my LVM root so signoff x86_64.
>
> Did you recreate your initramfs for the test?
>
Yes I did,
Am 06.09.2010 21:30, schrieb jwbirdsong:
> On 09/06/2010 11:29 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>> Upstream update, please sign off.
>>
>
> Can still boot to my LVM root so signoff x86_64.
Did you recreate your initramfs for the test?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 09/06/2010 11:29 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Upstream update, please sign off.
>
Can still boot to my LVM root so signoff x86_64.
On 6 September 2010 19:35, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 06.09.2010 14:09, schrieb Jan de Groot:
>> Please signoff for both architectures. This release should fix the
>> threading issues that crashes KDE a lot.
>>
>> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20604
>
> Looking good so far, although I didn't have
On 6 September 2010 19:57, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> So, here is another xz release. The upstream change from pkgrel=6 that
> actually changes relevant code among some translation fixes is "xz: Use
> an array instead of pointer for stdin_filename."
>
> Please sign off,
>
> Pierre
>
> --
> Pierre Sch
Upstream update, please sign off.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I feel the package should be ported to core.
I'm using it from testing since 2-3 days and dolphin problem has been solved.
--
Regards,
Nilesh Govindarajan
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/nilesh.gr
Twitter: http://twitter.com/nileshgr
Website: http://www.itech7.com
VPS Hosting: http://www.itech7
On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 12:44 -0300, Armando M. Baratti wrote:
> Em 06-09-2010 08:45, Mike Sampson escreveu:
>
> > If the OP went with a wireless
> > keyboard with properly implemented encryption it could actually be
> > more secure than a wired keyboard.
> >
> > [1]
> > http://www.pcworld.com
Em 06-09-2010 08:45, Mike Sampson escreveu:
If the OP went with a wireless
keyboard with properly implemented encryption it could actually be
more secure than a wired keyboard.
[1]
http://www.pcworld.com/article/161166/a_way_to_sniff_keystrokes_from_thin_air.html
[2] http://lasecwww.epfl.
On 6 September 2010 17:25, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> On 09/06/2010 06:15 PM, mwnn wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> I am running the x86 version of Arch. The recently updated wireshark
>> segfaults on my machine.
>>
>> Here is the backtrace of the core file generated by gdb.
>>
>> (gdb) bt
>> #0 0xb4e3731f in PyObjec
On 09/06/2010 06:15 PM, mwnn wrote:
Hi,
I am running the x86 version of Arch. The recently updated wireshark
segfaults on my machine.
Here is the backtrace of the core file generated by gdb.
(gdb) bt
#0 0xb4e3731f in PyObject_IsInstance () from /usr/lib/libpython2.6.so.1.0
#1 0xb4e37bd7 in PySe
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:15 AM, mwnn wrote:
> Hi,
> I am running the x86 version of Arch. The recently updated wireshark
> segfaults on my machine.
>
> Here is the backtrace of the core file generated by gdb.
>
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0xb4e3731f in PyObject_IsInstance () from /usr/lib/libpython2.6.s
Hi,
I am running the x86 version of Arch. The recently updated
wireshark segfaults on my machine.
Here is the backtrace of the core file generated by gdb.
(gdb) bt
#0 0xb4e3731f in PyObject_IsInstance () from /usr/lib/libpython2.6.so.1.0
#1 0xb4e37bd7 in PySequence_Check () from /usr/li
On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 11:38 +0200, Cédric Girard wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Partha Chowdhury wrote:
>
> > Recently I am looking for an ergonomic keyboard to replace my old
> > samsung pleomax keyboard. I wanted to buy microsoft natural ergonomic
> > keyboard 4000 but that is not in
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 22:34 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> So you are saying that everyone should be able to signoff? I think
> the
> main point is everyone can block a signoff by filing a bug report.
The funny thing with this specific case is that I didn't even ask for
signoff. I asked on the bu
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 05/09/10 22:52, Martín Cigorraga wrote:
>>
>> 2010/9/5 Allan McRae
>>
>>> On 05/09/10 22:14, Martín Cigorraga wrote:
>>>
Hi,
I'm using dbus-core 1.2.24-2 from [testing] on x86_64 since yesterday
[0]
and it works really goo
Am 06.09.2010 13:28, schrieb Nilesh Govindarajan:
> Hi,
> I've enabled testing & community-testing repos in pacman.
> I'd like to join the package testing team.
> How do I?
1) Report bugs about packages while they are still in [testing] or
[community-testing]. We get way too few reports from users
> On 09/06/2010 07:48 AM, Partha Chowdhury wrote:
>
> Google searches do return some interesting results [2]. Although a
> keyboard/receiver pair can claim to use encryption it may be poorly
> implemented [1]. Logitech seems to use a proper encryption scheme [2]
> but who knows if it has some flaw
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 14:28, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> Hi,
> I've enabled testing & community-testing repos in pacman.
> I'd like to join the package testing team.
> How do I?
>
>
"As such, users of the [testing] repository are strongly encouraged to
subscribe to the arch-dev-public mailing l
Hi,
I've enabled testing & community-testing repos in pacman.
I'd like to join the package testing team.
How do I?
--
Regards,
Nilesh Govindarajan
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/nilesh.gr
Twitter: http://twitter.com/nileshgr
Website: http://www.itech7.com
VPS Hosting: http://www.itech7.com/a/v
On 09/06/2010 07:48 AM, Partha Chowdhury wrote:
> Recently I am looking for an ergonomic keyboard to replace my old
> samsung pleomax keyboard. I wanted to buy microsoft natural ergonomic
> keyboard 4000 but that is not in the market and the only other keyboard
> I find is logitech ergonomic keyboa
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Partha Chowdhury wrote:
> Recently I am looking for an ergonomic keyboard to replace my old
> samsung pleomax keyboard. I wanted to buy microsoft natural ergonomic
> keyboard 4000 but that is not in the market and the only other keyboard
> I find is logitech ergono
Partha Chowdhury :
> If others on the list are using wireless keyboard, what are your
> experiences and recommendations?
I'm using "Cherry Wireless"[1]. I love it's thin appearance. Imho the
connection is encrypted.
[1]:
http://www.cherry.de/deutsch/produkte/wireless_desktops_eVolution_ORCA_Wirel
29 matches
Mail list logo
