Re: [arch-general] Open Letter (Plea for Medical Help/Assistance) to World Leaders

2010-08-27 Thread Robert Howard
HFS! That's the longest spam I've ever seen. On Aug 27, 2010 10:17 PM, "Aaron Griffin" wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Ray Rashif wrote: >> Aaron, did you not do something about this the last time? > > Yeah, it's a new address this time. I blocked that one too...

Re: [arch-general] Open Letter (Plea for Medical Help/Assistance) to World Leaders

2010-08-27 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Ray Rashif wrote: > Aaron, did you not do something about this the last time? Yeah, it's a new address this time. I blocked that one too...

Re: [arch-general] multilib repo and flashplugin

2010-08-27 Thread Rafael Beraldo
On 27 August 2010 21:00, Heiko Baums wrote: > Am Fri, 27 Aug 2010 20:42:47 -0300 > schrieb Rafael Beraldo : > > > Yes, I ran pacman -Rns flashplugin and then pacman -S flashplugin. > > Anyway, I found more errors when I did so: > > I couldn't reproduce it, too. So one stupid question: Have you st

Re: [arch-general] multilib repo and flashplugin

2010-08-27 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Fri, 27 Aug 2010 20:42:47 -0300 schrieb Rafael Beraldo : > Yes, I ran pacman -Rns flashplugin and then pacman -S flashplugin. > Anyway, I found more errors when I did so: I couldn't reproduce it, too. So one stupid question: Have you still installed old lib32-* packages from [community] or AUR

Re: [arch-general] multilib repo and flashplugin

2010-08-27 Thread Rafael Beraldo
On 27 August 2010 20:37, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 28.08.2010 01:13, schrieb Rafael Beraldo: > > I've just activated the multilib repository and installed flashplugin > from > > there. But during installation, nspluginwrapper gives an error: > > > > nspluginwrapper: no appropriate viewer found f

Re: [arch-general] multilib repo and flashplugin

2010-08-27 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 28.08.2010 01:13, schrieb Rafael Beraldo: > I've just activated the multilib repository and installed flashplugin from > there. But during installation, nspluginwrapper gives an error: > > nspluginwrapper: no appropriate viewer found for > /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/plugins/libflashplayer.so

Re: [arch-general] Open Letter (Plea for Medical Help/Assistance) to World Leaders

2010-08-27 Thread Chris Bannister
brb calling dr house. On 28 August 2010 00:24, Ray Rashif wrote: > On 28 August 2010 07:19, Baho Utot wrote: >>  On 08/27/2010 04:34 PM, Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) of Singapore wrote: >> >> [putolin] >> >>> I am exceedingly concerned that I might have heart/coronary artery disease >>> and th

Re: [arch-general] Open Letter (Plea for Medical Help/Assistance) to World Leaders

2010-08-27 Thread Ray Rashif
On 28 August 2010 07:19, Baho Utot wrote: >  On 08/27/2010 04:34 PM, Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) of Singapore wrote: > > [putolin] > >> I am exceedingly concerned that I might have heart/coronary artery disease >> and that it might be in the late stages. >> >> My physical symptoms are: >> >> 1)

Re: [arch-general] Open Letter (Plea for Medical Help/Assistance) to World Leaders

2010-08-27 Thread Baho Utot
On 08/27/2010 04:34 PM, Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) of Singapore wrote: [putolin] I am exceedingly concerned that I might have heart/coronary artery disease and that it might be in the late stages. My physical symptoms are: 1) Aching in the upper left of my chest since beginning January

[arch-general] multilib repo and flashplugin

2010-08-27 Thread Rafael Beraldo
I've just activated the multilib repository and installed flashplugin from there. But during installation, nspluginwrapper gives an error: nspluginwrapper: no appropriate viewer found for /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/plugins/libflashplayer.so What is a viewer anyway? How can I solve this problem

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.35.4-1

2010-08-27 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 08/27/2010 10:02 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: Latest kernel is in testing, please signoff for both arches. greetings tpowa nvidia is busted with this kernel. NVRM: nv_kern_mmap: invalid offset: 0x1000 @ 0x (PCI) NVRM: nv_kern_mmap: invalid offset: 0x1000 @ 0x000

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.35.4-1

2010-08-27 Thread Florian Pritz
On 27.08.2010 21:02, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Latest kernel is in testing, > please signoff for both arches. External modules are broken (nvidia) again. Never change the config without rebuilding everything ;) Please fix before moving to core. NO signoff. -- Florian Pritz -- {flo,bluewi...@se

Re: [arch-general] 1. Re: version control system for normal user (Magnus Therning)

2010-08-27 Thread José M . Prieto
2010/8/27 jewelshaw : > Nice to get your suggestions. I'd better try git, since many recommend. As > for svn, just "svnadmin create "a repository does work? > PS: Sorry for my stupidity. I'm new to mailing list, and don't know how to > reply a certain post. $ svnadmin create $HOME/repo $ svn co fi

[arch-general] Open Letter (Plea for Medical Help/Assistance) to World Leaders

2010-08-27 Thread Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) of Singapore
My Facebook account: http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=10750083982 Scanned documents in the (currently 42) photo albums of my Facebook account: http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=10750083982#!/profile.php?id=10750083982&v=photos Videos in my Facebook account: http://www.f

Re: [arch-general] Vala out of date

2010-08-27 Thread Denis Kobozev
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Ray Rashif wrote: > As a distro, we only update packages to "latest stable". There are a > few exceptions, especially those that are slow in releasing stable > versions of their software or are generally high-level tools that > rarely break. So if the maintainer of

[arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-lts 2.6.32.21-1

2010-08-27 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Latest kernel is in testing, please signoff for both arches. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.35.4-1

2010-08-27 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Latest kernel is in testing, please signoff for both arches. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [arch-general] Vala out of date

2010-08-27 Thread Ray Rashif
On 28 August 2010 02:33, Denis Kobozev wrote: > I don't know what's worse - installing Vala to build these from AUR or > read the 1 millionth request to update Vala :) The thing is we have to include whatever is a makedep in the repos (because we provide ABS; nothing to do with AUR). A more preci

Re: [arch-general] Vala out of date

2010-08-27 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 08/27/2010 09:33 PM, Denis Kobozev wrote: On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: On 08/27/2010 08:58 PM, Denis Kobozev wrote: Wouldn't it be easier for you and everybody else if you deleted vala from the repo completely? There are no packages that require it and users who need i

Re: [arch-general] Vala out of date

2010-08-27 Thread Denis Kobozev
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > On 08/27/2010 08:58 PM, Denis Kobozev wrote: >> Wouldn't it be easier for you and everybody else if you deleted vala >> from the repo completely? There are no packages that require it and >> users who need it have to get the latest version from

Re: [arch-general] Vala out of date

2010-08-27 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 08/27/2010 08:58 PM, Denis Kobozev wrote: for the 99 time, vala 0.9.x is the devel branch and i'm not going to update it. shotwell was updated to 0.7 and vala 0.9.5 is a _makedepends_ not a depends for this app Wouldn't it be easier for you and everybody else if you deleted vala from th

Re: [arch-general] Vala out of date

2010-08-27 Thread Denis Kobozev
> for the 99 time, vala 0.9.x is the devel branch and i'm not going to > update it. > > shotwell was updated to 0.7 and vala 0.9.5 is a _makedepends_ not a depends > for this app Wouldn't it be easier for you and everybody else if you deleted vala from the repo completely? There are no package

Re: [arch-general] Vala out of date

2010-08-27 Thread Dave Reisner
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 06:09:27PM +0200, Andre Osku Schmidt wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Jackson Alley > wrote: > >  On 08/27/2010 11:27 AM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > >> > >> On 08/27/2010 06:23 PM, Jackson Alley wrote: > >>> > >>> The vala package is several versions out of date and some

Re: [arch-general] Vala out of date

2010-08-27 Thread Andre "Osku" Schmidt
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Jackson Alley wrote: >  On 08/27/2010 11:27 AM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: >> >> On 08/27/2010 06:23 PM, Jackson Alley wrote: >>> >>> The vala package is several versions out of date and some packages now >>> depend on the .9 branch like shotwell. Here's an updated PKGBUILD

Re: [arch-general] Vala out of date

2010-08-27 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 08/27/2010 06:23 PM, Jackson Alley wrote: The vala package is several versions out of date and some packages now depend on the .9 branch like shotwell. Here's an updated PKGBUILD: http://dpaste.com/234866/ Jackson for the 99 time, vala 0.9.x is the devel branch and i'm not going to upd

Re: [arch-general] Vala out of date

2010-08-27 Thread Jackson Alley
On 08/27/2010 11:27 AM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: On 08/27/2010 06:23 PM, Jackson Alley wrote: The vala package is several versions out of date and some packages now depend on the .9 branch like shotwell. Here's an updated PKGBUILD: http://dpaste.com/234866/ Jackson for the 99 time, vala 0.9.x i

[arch-general] Vala out of date

2010-08-27 Thread Jackson Alley
The vala package is several versions out of date and some packages now depend on the .9 branch like shotwell. Here's an updated PKGBUILD: http://dpaste.com/234866/ Jackson

Re: [arch-general] Interactive boot mode like in Gentoo

2010-08-27 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:02:43 +1100 schrieb "joker-...@yandex.ru" : > What do you think about it? Need to be in Arch? > > During booting before starting daemons appears message: > > "Press I to enter interactive boot mode" > > Interactive boot allows to select action for each daemon such "start

Re: [arch-general] Interactive boot mode like in Gentoo

2010-08-27 Thread Magnus Therning
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:15, Ray Rashif wrote: > On 27 August 2010 15:02, joker-...@yandex.ru wrote: >> Interactive boot allows to select action for each daemon such "start >> service" and "skip service" > > You already decide whether to "start service" or "skip service" when > you edit /etc/rc

Re: [arch-general] Interactive boot mode like in Gentoo

2010-08-27 Thread Ray Rashif
On 27 August 2010 15:02, joker-...@yandex.ru wrote: > Interactive boot allows to select action for each daemon such "start > service" and "skip service" You already decide whether to "start service" or "skip service" when you edit /etc/rc.conf. In the event you feel like it's important to change

Re: [arch-general] 1. Re: version control system for normal user (Magnus Therning)

2010-08-27 Thread Baho Utot
On 08/26/2010 10:51 PM, jewelshaw wrote: Nice to get your suggestions. I'd better try git, since many recommend. As for svn, just "svnadmin create "a repository does work? PS: Sorry for my stupidity. I'm new to mailing list, and don't know how to reply a certain post. Thank you all http://sv

Re: [arch-general] Interactive boot mode like in Gentoo

2010-08-27 Thread Dieter Plaetinck
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:02:43 +1100 "joker-...@yandex.ru" wrote: > > What do you think about it? Need to be in Arch? > > During booting before starting daemons appears message: > > "Press I to enter interactive boot mode" > > Interactive boot allows to select action for each daemon such "start

[arch-general] Makepkg $(srcdir) detection and false-positives

2010-08-27 Thread Nathan Wayde
I'm not sure if this is the correct ML or not but whatever I'll post here anyway. I was just reading the ML where the quest? to finding why makepkg warns about $srcdir was brought up and a simple grep -R... seemed to be the method of detection. Anyway it reminded me of another message on the

[arch-general] Interactive boot mode like in Gentoo

2010-08-27 Thread joker-...@yandex.ru
What do you think about it? Need to be in Arch? During booting before starting daemons appears message: "Press I to enter interactive boot mode" Interactive boot allows to select action for each daemon such "start service" and "skip service"