My sound card has two sockets each for mic & output.
One set in the front & another in the rear.
I connect headphone to the front one and the rear one is connected to a
power amplifier.
I can see headphone control in alsamixer, kmix, but I can't adjust its
volume separately, only mute/unmute it
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010, Chris Brannon wrote:
Jude DaShiell writes:
In order for that to be correct it needs to also have :/usr/local/bin
inside of the quote marks. The /usr/local/bin directory on Linux
systems like slackware and debian is where stuff gets put that anyone
can execute that's on t
The only reason I bought this up at all was because on more than one Linux
distro site there's requests for people to use mirrors that are
geographically close to them since the admins of those sites apparently
check logs and kick off people that are very far away from the download
sites. I ag
This a strange one:
I left my system running for about 8 hours today (had a brainstorm session
for upcoming Software Freedom Day) and when I came back I noticed some weird
behaviour with the mouse pointer, so I decided reboot. Now I have a red FAIL
notice when "Configuring System Clock". I already
On 22/08/10 06:11, Florian Pritz wrote:
On 15.08.2010 00:20, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Am Sonntag 15 August 2010 schrieb Allan McRae:
On 15/08/10 04:37, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Am Donnerstag 12 August 2010 schrieb Allan McRae:
Upstream release announcement:
http://groups.google.com/group/gnu.
I am having some issues with K3b
Under KDE4 ( yes I hate it)
When I start K3b it detects a blank dvd in the dvd writer but when
selecting the burn image tool from the menu it does not reconize the
blank dvd.
I looked into the frums and the wiki but didn't find anything that was
helpful
On 15.08.2010 00:20, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Am Sonntag 15 August 2010 schrieb Allan McRae:
>> On 15/08/10 04:37, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
>> > Am Donnerstag 12 August 2010 schrieb Allan McRae:
>> >> Upstream release announcement:
>> >> http://groups.google.com/group/gnu.announce/browse_thread/t
@Madhurya: actually I was ironic about that - please note I didn't wanted to
talk bad about *buntu-land, I myself get started in GNU/Linux thanks to
Ubuntu.
Of course adding features isn't wrong, but I used that word to name an
automatic process that goes straight against Arch's spirit if implement
On Aug 21, 2010, at 8:25 AM, Madhurya Kakati
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Martín Cigorraga
> wrote:
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> In fact I agree with you. If we start adding one 'feature' after
>> another we
>> will end with a *buntu system in the near future.
>> List, please forgot my mail,
On 08/21/2010 06:17 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 18:51 +0530, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Lauri Niskanen wrote:
On 08/21/2010 01:33 PM, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
noob question: what does this signoff means?
Basically it means that it works OK for you
On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 18:51 +0530, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Lauri Niskanen wrote:
> > On 08/21/2010 01:33 PM, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> >>>
> >>> noob question: what does this signoff means?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Basically it means that it works OK for you and you are wil
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Martín Cigorraga
wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> In fact I agree with you. If we start adding one 'feature' after another we
> will end with a *buntu system in the near future.
> List, please forgot my mail, thanks.
>
Whats wrong with adding features?
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Lauri Niskanen wrote:
> On 08/21/2010 01:33 PM, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
>>>
>>> noob question: what does this signoff means?
>>>
>>
>> Basically it means that it works OK for you and you are willing to
>> "sign off the declaration the package is OK and can be moved
Hi Thomas,
In fact I agree with you. If we start adding one 'feature' after another we
will end with a *buntu system in the near future.
List, please forgot my mail, thanks.
On 08/21/2010 01:33 PM, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
noob question: what does this signoff means?
Basically it means that it works OK for you and you are willing to
"sign off the declaration the package is OK and can be moved to
[core]." Usually it's not used for packages from [extra] or
[community
On 19 August 2010 22:53, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:52:11 +0800
> schrieb Ray Rashif :
>
>> Just run this from the makepkg build dir:
>>
>> grep -R "$(pwd)/src" pkg/
>
> I've done this with my package kernel26-fbcondecor, which is kernel26
> with just one additional patch and with
>
> noob question: what does this signoff means?
>
Basically it means that it works OK for you and you are willing to
"sign off the declaration the package is OK and can be moved to
[core]." Usually it's not used for packages from [extra] or
[community].
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 3:16 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Latest kernel is in testing,
> please signoff for both arches.
>
> greetings
> tpowa
> --
> Tobias
> Powalowski
> Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer
> (tpowa)
> http://www.archlinux.org
> tp...@archlinux.org
>
>
noob question: what
18 matches
Mail list logo
