On 12 August 2010 02:07, Dan McGee wrote:
> Pierre seems to have forgotten about community-testing I guess. :)
>
> -Dan
I don't have a strong resentment against this, but if it can be sorted
out soon, we can test the water with the python rebuild.
--
GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:40:56 +0300, Evangelos Foutras
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Evangelos Foutras
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 4:16 AM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> On 08/11/2010 02:31 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>>
>> could we xport this discussion to forums? else more productive for
>> mailing list would be a proposal for inclusion into pacman.
>>
>> C Anthony
>>
>
> Thank you C Anthony, good poin
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:40:56 +0300, Evangelos Foutras
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Evangelos Foutras
>>> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Pierre Schmitz
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:41:06 +0100, Mario Figueiredo
wrote:
> Forward Rationale: To give end users (and potential devs) an
>> The idea can be summed up like this:
>>
>> testing:
>> * don't break packages intentionally
>> * don't push incomplete rebuilds
>>
>
> This would definitely get me int
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:40:56 +0300, Evangelos Foutras
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Evangelos Foutras
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Let me underline again that [staging] would be no re
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Evangelos Foutras
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>>> Let me underline again that [staging] would be no regular repo that
>>> would be used by anyone directly. It mainly mean
Forward Rationale: To give end users (and potential devs) an opportunity
to discuss this too.
On 11-08-2010 16:29, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Hi devs,
my last attempt for this didn't get much feedback so I try to keep it
short this time...for more details see the old thread at:
http://mailman.arch
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>> Let me underline again that [staging] would be no regular repo that
>> would be used by anyone directly. It mainly meant for collecting
>> rebuilds.
>
> However, it would have to
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Let me underline again that [staging] would be no regular repo that
> would be used by anyone directly. It mainly meant for collecting
> rebuilds.
However, it would have to be used by anyone wanting to rebuild a
package against a new librar
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 8:17 PM, J. W. Birdsong
wrote:
> On 08/11/10 at 05:05am, Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote:
>
>
> Again?? Really??
I have a headache. Why isn't Fidel Castro helping me??
Upstream update, please test and sign off.
We should probably be able to move this to core by the end of the week
unless major problems occur.
Please also sign off on 2.6.34.3 (see
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2010-August/017557.html),
I'd like to move that to core today
On 08/11/2010 02:31 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
could we xport this discussion to forums? else more productive for
mailing list would be a proposal for inclusion into pacman.
C Anthony
Thank you C Anthony, good point:
With version 0.0.7, it now has the capability to run completely graphic
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:17 PM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> On 08/10/2010 09:31 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
>>
>> On 08/10/2010 05:29 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/10/2010 03:46 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
On 08/05/2010 10:51 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
>
> Guys,
>
>>>
-- Forwarded message --
From: Tobias Powalowski
Date: 2 August 2010 21:46
Subject: [arch-dev-public] Fwd: Junior Developer Mentor Scheme
To: Public mailing list for Arch Linux development <
arch-dev-pub...@archlinux.org>
-- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --
Betreff
15 matches
Mail list logo