On 08/02/2010 11:59 PM, Nicolas D wrote:
On Tuesday 03 August 2010 06:52:45 J. W. Birdsong wrote:
Great point; but we could at least mention **Restart Dovecot with
#/etc/rc.d/dovecot restart** (or some such msg) in the dovecot.install
file.Because we know EVERYONE reads the pacman msg(s) af
On 08/02/2010 11:39 PM, Tavian Barnes wrote:
Because of KISS? Pacman is a package manager, not a system administration tool.
Imagine the story with a different daemon: SSH. You ssh into your
box, su, and pacman -Syu. Halfway through the upgrade, openssh gets
updated, which automatically resta
Guys,
This is just a point of interest more than anything else. Many of you know I
came to Arch from suse and one of the reasons was suse announced plan to
eliminate kde3 in its 11.2 release in early 2009. Arch had chakra and it worked
great so Arch was a great logical choice.
It seems tha
Hi,
is possible to image my current Arch system into a USB pendrive and use it
from there?
Many thanks!
Martín
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 23:00 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Sending mail from my local server resulted in errors "could not copy
> sent mail
> to 'sent' on servername? Checking the mail logs, I found this:
>
>
> Aug 2 17:15:03 nirvana dovecot: imap-login: Fatal: Dovecot versio
You can restart openssh without being kicked off.
"Tavian Barnes" wrote:
>On 2 August 2010 22:00, David C. Rankin wrote:
>> Guys,
>>
>> Sending mail from my local server resulted in errors "could not copy
>> sent mail to 'sent' on servername? Checking the mail logs, I found this:
>>
>>
On Tuesday 03 August 2010 06:52:45 J. W. Birdsong wrote:
> Great point; but we could at least mention **Restart Dovecot with
> #/etc/rc.d/dovecot restart** (or some such msg) in the dovecot.install
> file.Because we know EVERYONE reads the pacman msg(s) after an
> install. Regardless I think
On 08/02/10 at 10:39pm, Tavian Barnes wrote:
> On 2 August 2010 22:00, David C. Rankin
> wrote:
> > Guys,
> >
> > Sending mail from my local server resulted in errors "could not copy
> > sent mail to 'sent' on servername? Checking the mail logs, I found this:
> >
> >
> > Aug 2 17:15:03 n
On 2 August 2010 22:00, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Sending mail from my local server resulted in errors "could not copy
> sent mail to 'sent' on servername? Checking the mail logs, I found this:
>
>
> Aug 2 17:15:03 nirvana dovecot: imap-login: Fatal: Dovecot version
> mismatch: M
Guys,
Sending mail from my local server resulted in errors "could not copy sent mail
to 'sent' on servername? Checking the mail logs, I found this:
Aug 2 17:15:03 nirvana dovecot: imap-login: Fatal: Dovecot version mismatch:
Master is v1.2.12, login is v1.2.13 (if you don't care, set versi
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 22:38 -0400, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> On 08/02/2010 06:44 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > Notices did go out on one of the lists (forgot which one) that the new
> > tiered mirror scheme was coming into effect.
>
> Link? I don't recall seeing anything about that either here or on
I don't know if this was addressed before, I'm sorry to say this and you'll
probably hate me but it's something that get my attention: the
authentication in Arch's website is, at least, very unefficient. At worst,
it's directly against Arch's Way, I think (I'm not the best guy to say this,
just giv
On 08/02/2010 06:44 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
Notices did go out on one of the lists (forgot which one) that the new
tiered mirror scheme was coming into effect.
Link? I don't recall seeing anything about that either here or on the
Arch announcements list.
Thanks,
DR
Would be useful to put a script in cron using reflector to update mirrors
say, once a week?
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 10:40 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 08/02/2010 02:17 AM, Burlynn Corlew Jr wrote:
> > https://www.archlinux.de/?page=MirrorStatus
> > http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Mirror
> > http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Beginners'_Guide#Mirrorcheck_for_up-to-date_packages
>
Guys,
My logs have been filling up with avahi-daemon messages. The avahi errors
always appear in groups of 3:
Aug 2 16:05:03 nirvana avahi-daemon[1954]: Invalid query packet.
Aug 2 16:05:03 nirvana avahi-daemon[1954]: Invalid query packet.
Aug 2 16:05:03 nirvana avahi-daemon[1954]: Invalid
Am Mon, 2 Aug 2010 18:10:22 +0200
schrieb Dieter Plaetinck :
> I think they mean keeping regular packages like usual, but just making
> more packages part of the base group.
> And like I said earlier, I don't see the point either.
This indeed doesn't make much sense, too.
I totally agree with you
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 18:08:50 +0200
Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:31:47 +0200
> schrieb Pierre Chapuis :
>
> > Just for information, the opposite point of view recently came up on
> > the suckless mailing-list:
> > http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1007/5256.html
> >
> > I prefer Arch's
Am Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:31:47 +0200
schrieb Pierre Chapuis :
> Just for information, the opposite point of view recently came up on
> the suckless mailing-list:
> http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1007/5256.html
>
> I prefer Arch's approach but it is probably true that a large base
> system reduces th
On 08/02/2010 02:17 AM, Burlynn Corlew Jr wrote:
https://www.archlinux.de/?page=MirrorStatus
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Mirror
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Beginners'_Guide#Mirrorcheck_for_up-to-date_packages
It is possible your current installed package list has had no updates,
On Monday 02 Aug 2010 at 15:50 Firmicus wrote:
> On 31/07/2010 14:00, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> > Am 31.07.2010 13:30, schrieb jesse jaara:
> >> The name and description of the arch-dev-public mailing list are
> >> extreamly misleading, for me personally the name and description tells
> >> that th
On Mon 02 Aug 2010 17:03 +0200, vlad wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 08:49:11AM -0400, Loui Chang wrote:
> > On Tue 27 Jul 2010 15:25 +0200, vlad wrote:
> > > Here is a patch against makepkg from git which introduces a new
> > > function "write_srcinfo()". This generates a file .SRCINFO - like
> >
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 10:03 AM, vlad wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 08:49:11AM -0400, Loui Chang wrote:
>> On Tue 27 Jul 2010 15:25 +0200, vlad wrote:
>> > Here is a patch against makepkg from git which introduces a new function
>> > "write_srcinfo()". This generates a file .SRCINFO - like the
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 08:49:11AM -0400, Loui Chang wrote:
> On Tue 27 Jul 2010 15:25 +0200, vlad wrote:
> > Here is a patch against makepkg from git which introduces a new function
> > "write_srcinfo()". This generates a file .SRCINFO - like the .PKGINFO
> > one - when "makepkg --source" is run a
On 31/07/2010 14:00, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 31.07.2010 13:30, schrieb jesse jaara:
The name and description of the arch-dev-public mailing list are
extreamly misleading, for me personally the name and description tells that
the list is open for everyone to discuss about development of Arch L
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:31:47 +0200
Pierre Chapuis wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 16:58:00 +0200, Dieter Plaetinck
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 16:46:33 +0200
> > Heiko Baums wrote:
> >
> >> I don't think that nilfs-utils should be moved to the base group. I
> >> agree with moving it to [core]
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 16:58:00 +0200, Dieter Plaetinck
wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 16:46:33 +0200
> Heiko Baums wrote:
>
>> I don't think that nilfs-utils should be moved to the base group. I
>> agree with moving it to [core] but not to base, because base is
>> assumed to be installed on every comp
On Tue 27 Jul 2010 15:25 +0200, vlad wrote:
> Here is a patch against makepkg from git which introduces a new function
> "write_srcinfo()". This generates a file .SRCINFO - like the .PKGINFO
> one - when "makepkg --source" is run and then it is added to the src.tar.gz
> archive.
> I think having s
On Monday 02 Aug 2010 at 08:48 Kazuo Teramoto wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at
4:33 AM, Peter Lewis wrote:
> > thread just prompted me
to check and yeah I hadn't had anything for at
> > least a few days. I just
did a sort of Monte-Carlo test, by switching
> > mirrors in
/etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist and
> -Mensaje original-
> De: arch-general-boun...@archlinux.org [mailto:arch-general-
> boun...@archlinux.org] En nombre de Peter Lewis
> Enviado el: lunes, 02 de agosto de 2010 9:33
> Para: arch-general@archlinux.org
> Asunto: Re: [arch-general] No updates in a while - Is this the 'untiered
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 4:33 AM, Peter Lewis wrote:
> thread just prompted me to check and yeah I hadn't had anything for at least
> a few days. I just did a sort of Monte-Carlo test, by switching mirrors in
> /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist and suddenly got a whole load of updates.
Well... we dont have
On Monday 02 Aug 2010 at 08:24 Robert Howard wrote:
> I've noticed the same
thing. No updates in a week. Very unusual for the
> packages I use.
This
thread just prompted me to check and yeah I hadn't had anything for at least
a few days. I just did a sort of Monte-Carlo test, by switching mirrors
I've noticed the same thing. No updates in a week. Very unusual for the
packages I use.
On Aug 2, 2010 3:17 AM, "Burlynn Corlew Jr" wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 12:37 AM, David C. Rankin <
> drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Guys,
>>
>> It is rare I go a week without some type of upd
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 12:37 AM, David C. Rankin <
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com> wrote:
> Guys,
>
>It is rare I go a week without some type of update. My last update
> was:
>
> [2010-07-25 04:49] upgraded wavegain (1.2.8-1 -> 1.2.8-2)
>
> Looking at archdev-public, there is a 7/24 "no mo
34 matches
Mail list logo
