Thanks, all
Im not realized untill now that not only those packages in AUR could be
flaged or commented, but any in the repository.
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 07/07/10 13:43, PT M. wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 6,
Joe:
I gave up on gpm in a terminal before x is started. I never could manage to get
to work right. The other thing I've noticed about the onboard graphics is
some manufacturers seem to modify the drivers slightly. I had one laptop
with ATI onboard and the only drivers I could make work were the o
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Here is a quick review on all these patches. I recommend that the lvm and
> crypttab changes get a decent amount of testing before these go live as they
> are the biggest changes being done.
>
> Why has this been removed:
> -if [ -x /etc/
On 07/07/10 13:43, PT M. wrote:
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:33 PM, PT M. wrote:
It's been a week since mercurial 1.6 released, extra/mercurial 1.5.4-1
is
still in the repository.
OMG! Raise the alarm!!!
You do realize none of us are full-
Here is a quick review on all these patches. I recommend that the lvm
and crypttab changes get a decent amount of testing before these go live
as they are the biggest changes being done.
Tighten up the console size finding code a bit.
Add some white space in test construct:
if ((STAT_C
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> You could also send a working pkgbuild to hopefully speed this up :P
speculatively (unless you know something I don't) the pkgbuild only
needs changes in pkgver and the md5sums. sending a patch for that is,
IMO a waste of everyone's time.
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:43 PM, PT M. wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:33 PM, PT M. wrote:
>> > It's been a week since mercurial 1.6 released, extra/mercurial 1.5.4-1
>> is
>> > still in the repository.
>>
>> OMG! Raise the alarm!!!
>>
>
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 11:43 PM, PT M. wrote:
> if I sent this to the wrong place, sorry, i just wanted the maintainer got
> noticed, maybe i shoud sent to him directly?
>
http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/mercurial/
there'd be a flag out of date link where the flagged out of date is.
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:33 PM, PT M. wrote:
> > It's been a week since mercurial 1.6 released, extra/mercurial 1.5.4-1
> is
> > still in the repository.
>
> OMG! Raise the alarm!!!
>
> You do realize none of us are full-time around here, rig
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:33 PM, PT M. wrote:
> It's been a week since mercurial 1.6 released, extra/mercurial 1.5.4-1 is
> still in the repository.
OMG! Raise the alarm!!!
You do realize none of us are full-time around here, right? The
maintainer will get to it when he can. Until then, learn t
It's been a week since mercurial 1.6 released, extra/mercurial 1.5.4-1 is
still in the repository.
--
Arch Linuxer, Pythoner, Geek
--> Blog: http://apt-blog.net
xf86-input-wacom (0.10.6) is one release behind upstream (0.10.7). The
package is orphaned, which may be why the flagging went unnoticed.
It would appear that on Jul 5, Myra Nelson did say:
> Joe:
>
> I've used nVidia cards for years and fought the same problems for
> years (12 or so),
> and used 3Dfx voodoo cards prior to nVidia. I've personally experienced the
> same
> problems with several different generations of nVidia graph
On Sun, 2010-07-04 at 09:35 -0600, Tavian Barnes wrote:
> On 4 July 2010 07:22, b1 wrote:
> > Hello altogether
> >
> > I am trying to get the bluetooth adapter of my dell latitude latpop to
> > work. In many tutorials I have read of the tool hid2hci. Unfortunatelly
> > this doesn't seem to be on
On 07/06/2010 12:29 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
It is in [testing] which you require to activate if you use [community-testing].
Allan
Thanks again Allan.
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
Rankin Law Firm, PLLC
510 Ochiltree Street
Nacogdoches, Texas 75961
Telephone: (936) 715-9333
Facsimile: (936) 71
15 matches
Mail list logo