At Mittwoch, 23. Juni 2010 14:20 ProfessorTomoe wrote:
> Is there a way to disable the symbolic link creation? I install aur
> packages using makepkg -ci, but the -ci switch combo does not delete
> the symlink. I don't want them created in the first place, so can I
> somehow turn off this behavi
At Mittwoch, 23. Juni 2010 07:26 Allan McRae wrote:
>> Or do you mean that a "makepkg -c" will clean elder invalid symlinks?
>
> This one.
Is there a way to delete not only elder symlinks and the destination too? Could
be very nice but is not a must.-)
See you, Attila
Sorry. I was having a blonde moment there. T500. Not X500.
I had X series servers on the brain from IBM.
Is there a way to disable the symbolic link creation? I install aur
packages using makepkg -ci, but the -ci switch combo does *not* delete
the symlink. I don't want them created in the first place, so can I
somehow turn off this behavior?
On 23/06/10 12:02, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Nathan Wayde wrote:
On 23/06/10 11:39, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Heiko Baums
wrote:
Am Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:50:37 +0530
schrieb Madhurya Kakati:
Itsn't catalyst-test in AUR Catalyst 1
Excerpts from Magnus Therning's message of 2010-06-20 00:35:36 +0200:
> On 18/06/10 16:09, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
> [...]
> > I only read that stuff on their mailinglist and in some kernel log/mail that
> > they're gonna change it to a module load time option in kernel .34. I don't
> > know any
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Nathan Wayde wrote:
> On 23/06/10 11:39, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Heiko Baums
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:50:37 +0530
>>> schrieb Madhurya Kakati:
>>>
Itsn't catalyst-test in AUR Catalyst 10.6?
>>>
>>> No, it'
On 23/06/10 11:39, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:50:37 +0530
schrieb Madhurya Kakati:
Itsn't catalyst-test in AUR Catalyst 10.6?
No, it's 10.4. You should use catalyst from AUR. It's 10.6.
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:50:37 +0530
> schrieb Madhurya Kakati :
>
>> Itsn't catalyst-test in AUR Catalyst 10.6?
>
> No, it's 10.4. You should use catalyst from AUR. It's 10.6.
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29111
>
> Heiko
>
O.K so
Am Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:50:37 +0530
schrieb Madhurya Kakati :
> Itsn't catalyst-test in AUR Catalyst 10.6?
No, it's 10.4. You should use catalyst from AUR. It's 10.6.
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29111
Heiko
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
> On 23/06/10 12:18, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> I haven't upgrade to Xorg 1.8 yet. The problem is that i am using
>> catalyst-test driver i.e fglrx on my system. So i wanted to know if
>> there will be any problems if i upgrade to
On 23/06/10 12:18, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
Hi,
I haven't upgrade to Xorg 1.8 yet. The problem is that i am using
catalyst-test driver i.e fglrx on my system. So i wanted to know if
there will be any problems if i upgrade to Xorg 1.8.
The reason i am asking this question is because of this
"To
Hi,
I haven't upgrade to Xorg 1.8 yet. The problem is that i am using
catalyst-test driver i.e fglrx on my system. So i wanted to know if
there will be any problems if i upgrade to Xorg 1.8.
The reason i am asking this question is because of this
"To get it work with xorg-server >= 1.8 (when it
13 matches
Mail list logo
