On 06/21/2010 09:40 PM, Gaurish Sharma wrote:
> Hi,
> I would be interested to know your experience of running arch as
> server os. running I use distros like debian,CentOS etc. till now I
> have been scared of running arch as server.
>
> Please share your experience
>
>
> Regards,
> Gaurish Sharma
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:27 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>> On 22/06/10 12:07, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>>>
>>> my point of this ramble if there is one, is that personally, i don't
>>> want _anyone_ other than upstream to make security de
Hi,
I would be interested to know your experience of running arch as
server os. running I use distros like debian,CentOS etc. till now I
have been scared of running arch as server.
Please share your experience
Regards,
Gaurish Sharma
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 22/06/10 12:07, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>>
>> my point of this ramble if there is one, is that personally, i don't
>> want _anyone_ other than upstream to make security decisions regarding
>> their software.if Arch started naively backpor
On 22/06/10 12:07, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
my point of this ramble if there is one, is that personally, i don't
want _anyone_ other than upstream to make security decisions regarding
their software.if Arch started naively backporting stuff based of
> the latest alert from XYZ, i wouldn't be st
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Andres P wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:17 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>> He said from git/svn... ie backporting, not contributing.
>>
>
> ...?
>
> Once they're in svn they're confined to abs? Besides, it's not like there's
> anything keeping upstream from l
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 18:47 -0500, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Jun 21, 2010, at 6:37 PM, Andres P wrote:
>
> > 2010/6/21 Ng Oon-Ee :
> >> bugs with upstream, which may not be the case with 5-10 security-
> >> patches
> >> from git/svn).
> >
> > This is just pessimistic outlook. Having patches
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:17 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> He said from git/svn... ie backporting, not contributing.
>
...?
Once they're in svn they're confined to abs? Besides, it's not like there's
anything keeping upstream from looking at obsd cvs, Debian's bug tracker, nor
Arch's svn repo,
On Jun 21, 2010, at 6:37 PM, Andres P wrote:
> 2010/6/21 Ng Oon-Ee :
>> bugs with upstream, which may not be the case with 5-10 security-
>> patches
>> from git/svn).
>
> This is just pessimistic outlook. Having patches means that you're
> actually
> contributing upstream instead of leaching the
Devs,
As mentioned earlier, after my HD tanked, I did my first Gnome only
install
using the Arch 2010-05 install media. Except for my FU forgetting mkswap, the
install is picture perfect. Further, since the radeon/dri/mesa modules are
mature enough that they handle gpu downclocking during
2010/6/21 Ng Oon-Ee :
> bugs with upstream, which may not be the case with 5-10 security-patches
> from git/svn).
This is just pessimistic outlook. Having patches means that you're actually
contributing upstream instead of leaching the latest ver every 3 weeks.
People need to stop with the notion
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 07:11:25 +0800
Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> I'd still like to know how this replaces/conflicts with Arch policy
> for 'as upstream as possible'. I'm aware that just starting out the
> answer may just be "we don't know yet", but for me one of the
> benefits of Arch is that all packages a
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 19:28 +0100, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
> 5. LONG TERM GOALS
>
> Most Arch stuff starts out as external projects than then merge with
> the main distro. If our work turns out to be useful, and I hope it
> will be, I would like us to become an official Arch Team. We could
> the
On 21 June 2010 22:58, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> If you are interested about vala, you can upload it aur as vala-devel
>
I may do that so gnome-dvb-daemon can be updated. Although the only
reason I wanted to give the new version of that a try (built both vala
and gnome-dvb-daemon locally) was to see if
On 06/22/2010 12:55 AM, Damien Churchill wrote:
On 21 June 2010 22:49, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 06/22/2010 12:46 AM, Damien Churchill wrote:
Since vala 0.9.2 is now out I figured I'd update the PKGBUILD for it,
just a simple version bump and sha256sum update.
http://pastie.org/1014264
is not l
On 21 June 2010 22:49, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> On 06/22/2010 12:46 AM, Damien Churchill wrote:
>>
>> Since vala 0.9.2 is now out I figured I'd update the PKGBUILD for it,
>> just a simple version bump and sha256sum update.
>>
>> http://pastie.org/1014264
>
> is not like is hard to update the build, is
On 06/22/2010 12:46 AM, Damien Churchill wrote:
Since vala 0.9.2 is now out I figured I'd update the PKGBUILD for it,
just a simple version bump and sha256sum update.
http://pastie.org/1014264
is not like is hard to update the build, is more like it doesn't fit in
our principle to bump to a d
Since vala 0.9.2 is now out I figured I'd update the PKGBUILD for it,
just a simple version bump and sha256sum update.
http://pastie.org/1014264
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 09:21:39PM +0200, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
> > After an upgrade, it will remain on your system if you do a pacman -Qdt
> >
> According to that rule, I don't need xorg-server !??? Some packages
> are missing a dep here, I think...
That's correct. Only few packages ac
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> On 06/21/2010 10:22 PM, Ignacio Galmarino wrote:
>>
>> After updating my system today and logging into gnome i get a dialog
>> with the following error:
>>
>> The panel encountered a problem while loading "OAFIID:GNOME_ClockApplet".
>>
>> and im
On 06/21/2010 10:22 PM, Ignacio Galmarino wrote:
After updating my system today and logging into gnome i get a dialog
with the following error:
The panel encountered a problem while loading "OAFIID:GNOME_ClockApplet".
and im offered the option to delete the clock applet.
Any idea what goes wro
Have you tried to reinstall libsoup?
-- Rafael Correia
2010/6/21 Ignacio Galmarino
>
> After updating my system today and logging into gnome i get a dialog
> with the following error:
>
> The panel encountered a problem while loading "OAFIID:GNOME_ClockApplet".
>
> and im offered the option to d
On 21/06/10 22:22, Ignacio Galmarino wrote:
After updating my system today and logging into gnome i get a dialog
with the following error:
The panel encountered a problem while loading "OAFIID:GNOME_ClockApplet".
and im offered the option to delete the clock applet.
Any idea what goes wrong ?
After updating my system today and logging into gnome i get a dialog
with the following error:
The panel encountered a problem while loading "OAFIID:GNOME_ClockApplet".
and im offered the option to delete the clock applet.
Any idea what goes wrong ?
Ignacio
Matthew Monaco wrote:
> On 06/21/2010 06:35 AM, Guillermo Leira wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> How can I know if I still need HAL?
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Guillermo Leira
>>
> After an upgrade, it will remain on your system if you do a pacman -Qdt
>
According to that rule, I don't need xorg-server
It's not browser specific by the way, it happens on various sites on
different browsers on different OSes: for example, I got stuck in a loop
trying to go to Google Docs in Chrome on Windows. I'm going to say it's
probably a bug in their login system.
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Ionuț Bîru w
Dear Arch community,
I thought I'd post a follow up on some of the things said in the last
thread I created on this list. I'm using upper case for headings just
to make things easier to read and not to shout! Please post or cc all
follow ups to the Arch General list, and read this message carefu
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 08:16:27PM +0300, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> just cleaned my profile(cookies, cache and active logins). seems
> that now is working
I've noticed another weird thing with firefox: when typing
in the 'search' field (right top), quite frequently the
desktop session ends and I find m
On 06/21/2010 10:47 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
On 06/21/10 12:33, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
I'm laughing at myself for being unable to get swap activated.
Initially, when
I breezed through the install, I forgot to set /dev/sdb6 to type 82 so
the box
came up with swap off (2G of ram so not much of
On 06/21/10 12:33, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
I'm laughing at myself for being unable to get swap activated.
Initially, when
I breezed through the install, I forgot to set /dev/sdb6 to type 82 so the box
came up with swap off (2G of ram so not much of an issue)
But now, I wan
On 06/21/2010 07:57 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
On 06/21/2010 10:20 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 06/21/2010 07:47 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
When I try to use google groups on firefox, it keeps redirecting in a
loop.
groups.google.com homepage loads, then when I click on any group, it
goes t
>>
>> mkswap /dev/sdb6
>> echo "/dev/sdb6 swap swap defaults 0 0" >> /etc/fstab
>>
> swapon -av
>
Thanks to all. That loud 'POP!' you heard was the CRI being cured.
(for the curious, CRI=Cranal Rectal Inversion)
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
Rankin Law Firm, PLLC
510 Ochiltree Street
Nacogdoc
On 06/21/2010 10:20 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 06/21/2010 07:47 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
When I try to use google groups on firefox, it keeps redirecting in a
loop.
groups.google.com homepage loads, then when I click on any group, it
goes to google's ssl for login validation, then back to gr
On 06/21/2010 07:47 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
When I try to use google groups on firefox, it keeps redirecting in a loop.
groups.google.com homepage loads, then when I click on any group, it
goes to google's ssl for login validation, then back to groups then
again to ssl... keeps going on.
On 06/21/2010 10:19 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
On 06/21/2010 10:03 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
I'm laughing at myself for being unable to get swap activated.
Initially, when
I breezed through the install, I forgot to set /dev/sdb6 to type 82 so
the box
came up with swap off (2G of ram
On 06/21/2010 11:35 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 11:33 AM, David C. Rankin
> wrote:
>> Guys,
>>
>>I'm laughing at myself for being unable to get swap activated.
>> Initially, when
>> I breezed through the install, I forgot to set /dev/sdb6 to type 82 so the
>> box
>> ca
On 06/21/2010 10:03 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
I'm laughing at myself for being unable to get swap activated.
Initially, when
I breezed through the install, I forgot to set /dev/sdb6 to type 82 so the box
came up with swap off (2G of ram so not much of an issue)
But now,
When I try to use google groups on firefox, it keeps redirecting in a loop.
groups.google.com homepage loads, then when I click on any group, it
goes to google's ssl for login validation, then back to groups then
again to ssl... keeps going on.
What can be the problem ?
--
Regards,
Nilesh Gov
David C. Rankin kirjoitti maanantai, 21. kesäkuuta 2010 19:33:18:
> Guys,
>
> I'm laughing at myself for being unable to get swap activated.
> Initially,
> when I breezed through the install, I forgot to set /dev/sdb6 to type 82
> so the box came up with swap off (2G of ram so not much of a
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 11:33 AM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I'm laughing at myself for being unable to get swap activated.
> Initially, when
> I breezed through the install, I forgot to set /dev/sdb6 to type 82 so the box
> came up with swap off (2G of ram so not much of an issue)
Guys,
I'm laughing at myself for being unable to get swap activated.
Initially, when
I breezed through the install, I forgot to set /dev/sdb6 to type 82 so the box
came up with swap off (2G of ram so not much of an issue)
But now, I want to activate it and I get an error activati
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 5:50 AM, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:35:23 +0200
> "Guillermo Leira" wrote:
>
> > > >>> WOW nice. So HAL is not needed anymore ?
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> Not for X. You may still need it for other things...
> > > >>
> > > >> Allan
> > > >>
> > > > Mo
In fact this happeded weeks before, maybe after upgrading to xorg1.8, when
typing in xterm, it left with each letter with an annoying vertical line.
[see the image attached]
I believe this has something to do with compiz-wm, if I switch to the other
window and switch back, those lines gone, but s
On 06/21/2010 07:05 PM, 甘露(Gan Lu) wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 06/21/2010 06:34 AM, jwbirdsong wrote:
On 06/20/2010 09:13 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
On 21/06/10 13:04, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
On 06/21/2010 02:31 AM, Arch Linux: Recent news updates: Andreas
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> On 06/21/2010 06:34 AM, jwbirdsong wrote:
>>
>> On 06/20/2010 09:13 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>>>
>>> On 21/06/10 13:04, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
On 06/21/2010 02:31 AM, Arch Linux: Recent news updates: Andreas Radke
wrote:
>
>
> > How can I know if I still need HAL?
> >
>
> run "/etc/rc.d/hal stop" and remove it from your DAEMONS array. If
> stuff breaks, you needed it.
>
> Allan
Thank you very much to all. :-)
I'll have to mix all the answers: I have systems with XFCE and GNOME, physical
and virtual... I'll check
Im not 100% sure if KDE will work whit out hall, but KDE doesent use hal
directly instead it uses the Solid framework of KDE. Solid isint dependant of
one spesific bacend, but its like phonon so you can have multiple differend
back
ends whit it. i do not have any Idea of the state of differend
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 06:46:13AM -0400, Matthew Monaco wrote:
> >How can I know if I still need HAL?
> [...]
> After an upgrade, it will remain on your system if you do a pacman -Qdt
... which will, however, only work if hal hasn't been installed
explicitly and will also disregard optdeps.
If y
$ pacman -Qi hal
Name : hal
Version: 0.5.14-4
.
Required By: gnome-vfs vlc
.
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:35:23 +0200
> "Guillermo Leira" wrote:
>
> > > >>> WOW nice. So HAL is not needed anymore ?
> > > >
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:35:23 +0200
"Guillermo Leira" wrote:
> > >>> WOW nice. So HAL is not needed anymore ?
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> Not for X. You may still need it for other things...
> > >>
> > >> Allan
> > >>
> > > Most notabaly KDE and Thunar
> >
> > and in gnome with gnome-power-manager to h
On 21/06/10 20:35, Guillermo Leira wrote:
WOW nice. So HAL is not needed anymore ?
Not for X. You may still need it for other things...
Allan
Most notabaly KDE and Thunar
and in gnome with gnome-power-manager to have some special keys support
Hi,
How can I know if I still need HAL?
On 06/21/2010 06:35 AM, Guillermo Leira wrote:
WOW nice. So HAL is not needed anymore ?
Not for X. You may still need it for other things...
Allan
Most notabaly KDE and Thunar
and in gnome with gnome-power-manager to have some special keys support
Hi,
How can I know if I still need HAL
> >>> WOW nice. So HAL is not needed anymore ?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Not for X. You may still need it for other things...
> >>
> >> Allan
> >>
> > Most notabaly KDE and Thunar
>
> and in gnome with gnome-power-manager to have some special keys support
Hi,
How can I know if I still need HAL?
Best rega
On 06/21/2010 06:34 AM, jwbirdsong wrote:
On 06/20/2010 09:13 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
On 21/06/10 13:04, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
On 06/21/2010 02:31 AM, Arch Linux: Recent news updates: Andreas Radke
wrote:
Andreas Radke wrote:
This release works with udev for input hotplugging and supports
I still see the problem. Is it possible that it's bug in GCC?
Lukas
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 23:56 +0200, Alexander Duscheleit wrote:
> But there seems to be a trend starting in this direction which worries
> me a little. IIRC there is nothing holding back Xorg 1.8 except for
> legacy nvidia drivers, and that for quite a while. If that is true,
> it's even more depre
56 matches
Mail list logo
