On 06/09/2010 03:44 PM, Mauro Santos wrote:
> On 06/09/2010 07:16 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
>>
>> Before I add the drive to the heap of drives in my 'dead drive box' are
>> there
>> any other silver bullets I should try to try and resurrect the drive? (Data
>> isn't an issue, it's all backed
On 06/09/2010 03:14 PM, Sergey Manucharian wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Excerpts from David C. Rankin's message of Wed, 09 Jun 2010 13:16 -0500:
>
>> Before I add the drive to the heap of drives in my 'dead
>> drive box' are there any other silver bullets I should try to try and
>> resurrect the d
On 06/09/2010 07:16 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
>
> Before I add the drive to the heap of drives in my 'dead drive box' are
> there
> any other silver bullets I should try to try and resurrect the drive? (Data
> isn't an issue, it's all backed up :-)
>
> What say the gurus?
>
Try is
Hi David,
Excerpts from David C. Rankin's message of Wed, 09 Jun 2010 13:16 -0500:
> Before I add the drive to the heap of drives in my 'dead
> drive box' are there any other silver bullets I should try to try and
> resurrect the drive? (Data isn't an issue, it's all backed up :-)
I had si
Hi guys,
bump to latest version,
please signoff both arches
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi bump to latest version,
please signoff both arches,
thanks
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On 06/09/2010 01:16 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> The situation:
>
> On reboot - grub 22 error
> boot arch install cd 2009-08, cannot mount drive
> partition table shows 1 partition /dev/hda1 (PATA drive) (should be 3)
> (I can't put my hands on the saved 'fdisk -l' data, it
Guys,
I have a disk on a arch box that has gone south. No prior warning, no
smart
errors, no nothing. Granted the drive is 5-6 years old, so a complete crater is
not out of the question.
The situation:
On reboot - grub 22 error
boot arch install cd 2009-08, cannot mount
Hello list,
I tried audacious for a change this morning, but it segfaulted on
visualisation change[1]. From the look of the backtrace[2], and seeing
that glib was updated a couple of days ago, a simple rebuild of the
package should be sufficient.
I would normally have submitted that to the bug tr
Am 09.06.2010 16:45, schrieb Juan Diego Tascón:
> modprobe --resolve-alias usb:v0AC8p305Bd0100dcFFdsc00dp00icFFiscFFipFF
>
> it shows nothing.
This works for me on 2.6.34-ARCH. Maybe something went wrong during
depmod. See if the problem persists if you run 'depmod' as root.
signature.asc
Desc
Am 09.06.2010 16:45, schrieb Juan Diego Tascón:
> modinfo gspca_zc3xx
>
> and I got this line among a lot more:
>
> alias: usb:v0AC8p305Bd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*
>
> which obviously matches with mine:
>
> usb:v0AC8p305Bd0100dcFFdsc00dp00icFFiscFFipFF
>
> however when I run
>
> modprobe
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 09.06.2010 15:11, schrieb Juan Diego Tascón:
>>> In the above case, you would run:
>>> modprobe --resolve-alias usb:v0AC8p305Bd0100dcFFdsc00dp00icFFiscFFipFF
>>
>> I ran that and it didn't return anything, are these ids stored inside
>> t
Thomas Bächler (2010-06-09 14:44):
> Am 09.06.2010 14:34, schrieb Dan McGee:
> >> Not that I know the right way, but am running Arch with /etc/mtab copied
> >> (or symlinked, on another system) from /proc/mounts for more than a year
> >> now, without any problems.
>
> Having mtab as a symlink is a
Am 09.06.2010 15:11, schrieb Juan Diego Tascón:
>> In the above case, you would run:
>> modprobe --resolve-alias usb:v0AC8p305Bd0100dcFFdsc00dp00icFFiscFFipFF
>
> I ran that and it didn't return anything, are these ids stored inside
> the modules (*.ko)?
Yes, visible with modinfo.
signature.as
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Alexander Duscheleit wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 18:55:33 +0900
> Juan Diego Tascón wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Jan de Groot
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 15:49 +0900, Juan Diego Tascón wrote:
>> >> Actually it is installed, it is called gsp
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 09.06.2010 02:38, schrieb Matthew Monaco:
>> On 06/08/2010 02:41 AM, Jan de Groot wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 15:16 +0900, Juan Diego Tascón wrote:
Good day,
I'm getting an error every time I plug-in my webcam as a resu
Am 09.06.2010 14:34, schrieb Dan McGee:
>> Not that I know the right way, but am running Arch with /etc/mtab copied
>> (or symlinked, on another system) from /proc/mounts for more than a year
>> now, without any problems.
Having mtab as a symlink is a bad idea, mount writes more options into
mtab
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Rogutės Sparnuotos
wrote:
> Thomas Bächler (2010-06-09 09:47):
>> Am 09.06.2010 03:40, schrieb Dan McGee:
>> > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Thomas Bächler
>> > wrote:
>> >> Our current process of initializing /etc/mtab is
>> >> hackish and probably error-prone,
Thomas Bächler (2010-06-09 09:47):
> Am 09.06.2010 03:40, schrieb Dan McGee:
> > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> >> Our current process of initializing /etc/mtab is
> >> hackish and probably error-prone, replace it by
> >> simply copying /proc/mounts.
> >> ---
> >
> > Look
Am 09.06.2010 02:38, schrieb Matthew Monaco:
> On 06/08/2010 02:41 AM, Jan de Groot wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 15:16 +0900, Juan Diego Tascón wrote:
>>> Good day,
>>>
>>> I'm getting an error every time I plug-in my webcam as a result the
>>> corresponding module is not being loaded automatica
20 matches
Mail list logo
