Guys,
Here is one worth noting. The radeon driver has come a long way in the
past
couple of kernels or Xorg packages. I know the driver itself hasn't changed
since 11/2009 (ver. 1.3.0-1), but my desktop is working much better than the
last time I updated.
I have switched all 12 o
Hi,
if CONFIG_X86_RESERVE_LOW_64K is on, it should be ok, but there may be
some problems without. It must be a BIOS-bug.
http://tiny.cc/rfh49
Regards,
Andrej
On 05/29/2010 07:18 PM, Gaurish Sharma wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for reply.
CONFIG_X86_RESERVE_LOW_64K is already set enabled by default. Any
Hi,
Thanks for reply.
CONFIG_X86_RESERVE_LOW_64K is already set enabled by default. Any update?
Regards,
Gaurish Sharma
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Andrej Gelenberg
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> try to compile the kernel self with CONFIG_X86_RESERVE_LOW_64K
> (Processor type and features ---> Reserv
@all,
Thanks for your reviews, got pulse working. Its awesome !
--
Nilesh Govindarajan
Facebook: nilesh.gr
Twitter: nileshgr
Website: www.itech7.com
On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 14:48 +0100, Nathan Wayde wrote:
> On 29/05/10 14:45, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am looking for a global sound equalizer. It seems there is one for
> > pulseaudio, but does it work fine if anybody is using it on this list
> > ?
> > Also, any other alternative
Hi,
try to compile the kernel self with CONFIG_X86_RESERVE_LOW_64K
(Processor type and features ---> Reserve low 64K of RAM on
AMI/Phoenix BIOSen)
Regards,
Andrej
On 05/28/2010 11:01 PM, Gaurish Sharma wrote:
Hi,
I am getting the following error while resuming from suspend2ram. Its
a fully
On 29/05/10 14:45, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
Hi,
I am looking for a global sound equalizer. It seems there is one for
pulseaudio, but does it work fine if anybody is using it on this list
?
Also, any other alternatives because I am using ALSA.
Yes it works perfectly with PA, YMMV of-course.
Hi,
I am looking for a global sound equalizer. It seems there is one for
pulseaudio, but does it work fine if anybody is using it on this list
?
Also, any other alternatives because I am using ALSA.
--
Nilesh Govindarajan
Facebook: nilesh.gr
Twitter: nileshgr
Website: www.itech7.com
Am 29.05.2010 12:28, schrieb Roman Kyrylych:
>> I think I'm not going to add it. The 'force' option introduces some very
>> weird behaviour from what I remember. As the rc2 package was only in
>> testing, it shouldn't be a big deal, testing users should know what
>> they're doing and upgrade manual
2010/5/29 Alexander Lam
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 5:01 AM, Firmicus wrote:
> > On 12/05/2010 07:17, Caleb Cushing wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Firmicus wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Certainly this is because glib-perl needs to be recompiled with perl
> >>> 5.12.
> >>> Other perl
On 2010-05-28, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 27.05.2010 23:08, schrieb Ray Kohler:
>> You need "force" option for cryptsetup because 1.1.1_rc2-1 sorts as
>> newer than 1.1.1-1:
>>
>> warning: cryptsetup: local (1.1.1_rc2-1) is newer than testing (1.1.1-1)
>>
>
> I think I'm not going to add it. The '
I was using my mobile to post so i couldn't bottom post.
Yea i was trying out gname.
On 5/29/10, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
> Armando M. Baratti wrote:
>> @papul:
>> If you're trying some sort of program (like an automatic troller, or
>> something like this :-) on the list, you can test it on any normal mail
>> account, the list will behave the same.
>>
Armando M. Baratti wrote:
> @papul:
> If you're trying some sort of program (like an automatic troller, or
> something like this :-) on the list, you can test it on any normal mail
> account, the list will behave the same.
>
Ah, but if he's using some sort of news-to-mail gateway (like
gma
14 matches
Mail list logo
