Re: [arch-general] Arch shutdown because of firefox

2010-05-10 Thread Gaurish Sharma
On 05/11/2010 08:44 AM, Handsome Cheung wrote: hi all, I am a newbie for ArchLinux. My computer often shuts down suddenly when I browse web site. It brings me to TTY and said "The system is going down for system halt NOW!". I found that is because of the crash of flash plugin of firefox. And

[arch-general] 回复: Re: Arch shutdown b ecause of firefox

2010-05-10 Thread Handsome Cheung
any web site. 在 2010-5-11 上午11:16,"Jeffrey Lynn Parke Jr." 编写: which website does this for you. any website or one in particular. On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Handsome Cheung wrote: > hi all, > > I am a newbie for ArchLinux. > > My computer often shuts down suddenly when I browse ...

Re: [arch-general] Arch shutdown because of firefox

2010-05-10 Thread Jeffrey Lynn Parke Jr.
which website does this for you. any website or one in particular. On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Handsome Cheung wrote: > hi all, > > I am a newbie for ArchLinux. > > My computer often shuts down suddenly when I browse web site. It brings me > to TTY and said "The system is going down for sys

[arch-general] Arch shutdown because of firefox

2010-05-10 Thread Handsome Cheung
hi all, I am a newbie for ArchLinux. My computer often shuts down suddenly when I browse web site. It brings me to TTY and said "The system is going down for system halt NOW!". I found that is because of the crash of flash plugin of firefox. And my question is why the crash of firefox can cause

Re: [arch-general] PKGBUILD parser

2010-05-10 Thread Loui Chang
On Mon 10 May 2010 09:23 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > On 10/05/10 02:06, Loui Chang wrote: > >On Sun 09 May 2010 16:21 +0200, Xavier Chantry wrote: > >>But I just had an idea now, if we're thinking about AUR use case : > >>makepkg --source could generate a suitable and parsable file providing > >>al

Re: [arch-general] PKGBUILD parser

2010-05-10 Thread Kaiting Chen
Interesting I didn't realize that. But then it's not really a 'regular' expression then. They should call it a 'limited-context-free' expression... Kaiting. On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:21 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote: > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Pierre Chapuis > wrote: > > > > "Andre "Osku

Re: [arch-general] PKGBUILD parser

2010-05-10 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Pierre Chapuis wrote: > > "Andre "Osku" Schmidt" a écrit : > >>> A regular >>> expression will never be able to parse that.because it can never decide >>> which brace is the final one. This might be better explained here. >>> >>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions

Re: [arch-general] PKGBUILD parser

2010-05-10 Thread Pierre Chapuis
"Andre "Osku" Schmidt" a écrit : >> A regular >> expression will never be able to parse that.because it can never decide >> which brace is the final one. This might be better explained here. >> >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/133601/can-regular-expressions-be-used-to-match-nested-patterns

Re: [arch-general] Removing padevchooser and paman

2010-05-10 Thread Angel Velásquez
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Jan Steffens wrote: > Anyone else? If I don't get any objections, I'll move them to AUR and disown. > Go go go -- Angel Velásquez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Arch Linux Trusted User Linux Counter: #359909 http://www.angvp.com

Re: [arch-general] Removing padevchooser and paman

2010-05-10 Thread Jan Steffens
Anyone else? If I don't get any objections, I'll move them to AUR and disown. On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Jan Steffens wrote: > I would like to remove these two packages from community and move them to > unsupported (AUR). Both are marked as obsolete by upstream[1] and weren't > updated since

Re: [arch-general] extra/hibernate-script out of date -> new version

2010-05-10 Thread Guillaume ALAUX
Hi Thomas, Here is the package I have just uploaded in AUR: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37110 You can delete it from extra then. I checked others PKGBUILD and none of them make any reference to it so we should'nt have issues with dependencies. I will add some explanation on the AUR

Re: [arch-general] extra/hibernate-script out of date -> new version

2010-05-10 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 10.05.2010 15:57, schrieb Guillaume ALAUX: > OK So Thomas as you were the maintainer: could you just tell me which way > would be the best: git version as advised by Damjan or standalone as you did > for v1.99? In the past I always used the stable version. However, I never used it together with

Re: [arch-general] extra/hibernate-script out of date -> new version

2010-05-10 Thread Guillaume ALAUX
OK So Thomas as you were the maintainer: could you just tell me which way would be the best: git version as advised by Damjan or standalone as you did for v1.99? On 10 May 2010 15:50, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 10.05.2010 15:13, schrieb Guillaume ALAUX: > > Hi everyone, > > > > As stated by "mrb

Re: [arch-general] extra/hibernate-script out of date -> new version

2010-05-10 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 10.05.2010 15:13, schrieb Guillaume ALAUX: > Hi everyone, > > As stated by "mrbrich" in this thread [1], package extra/hibernate-script > [2] is out of date (old version 1.99 ; new version should be 2.0). I made > this new one [3] that installs fine but I can't test it. Could anyone using > i

Re: [arch-general] extra/hibernate-script out of date -> new version

2010-05-10 Thread Damjan Georgievski
> Hi everyone, > > As stated by "mrbrich" in this thread [1], package extra/hibernate-script > [2] is out of date (old version 1.99 ; new version should be 2.0).  I made > this new one [3] that installs fine but I can't test it.  Could anyone using > it give it a try please? At this time it might

[arch-general] extra/hibernate-script out of date -> new version

2010-05-10 Thread Guillaume ALAUX
Hi everyone, As stated by "mrbrich" in this thread [1], package extra/hibernate-script [2] is out of date (old version 1.99 ; new version should be 2.0). I made this new one [3] that installs fine but I can't test it. Could anyone using it give it a try please? Thanks Guillaume ALAUX [1] http

Re: [arch-general] PKGBUILD parser

2010-05-10 Thread Andre "Osku" Schmidt
my journey ended here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parsing_expression_grammar i tried couple hours to understand how to use the two js librarys that are listed there... but yeah, i have no expertise in that (PEG) field and couldn't find any newbie friendly tutorials on that subject... so another

Re: [arch-general] PKGBUILD parser

2010-05-10 Thread Xavier Chantry
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > On 10/05/10 02:06, Loui Chang wrote: >> >> On Sun 09 May 2010 16:21 +0200, Xavier Chantry wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Allan McRae  wrote: Sourcing is dangerous if the PKGBUILD is from an untrusted source.  It a

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.33.3-2 (and aufs2)

2010-05-10 Thread Marek Otahal
On Monday 10 of May 2010 12:11:28 Ionut Biru wrote: > On 05/10/2010 12:57 PM, Marek Otahal wrote: > > On Sunday 09 of May 2010 19:52:19 Thomas Bächler wrote: > >> Am 09.05.2010 19:37, schrieb Thomas Bächler: > >>> Am 09.05.2010 19:23, schrieb Pierre Schmitz: > I noticed the same. But this is c

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.33.3-2 (and aufs2)

2010-05-10 Thread Ionut Biru
On 05/10/2010 12:57 PM, Marek Otahal wrote: On Sunday 09 of May 2010 19:52:19 Thomas Bächler wrote: Am 09.05.2010 19:37, schrieb Thomas Bächler: Am 09.05.2010 19:23, schrieb Pierre Schmitz: I noticed the same. But this is caused by the mkinitcpio update and not the kernel. In my case "logo.nol

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.33.3-2 (and aufs2)

2010-05-10 Thread Marek Otahal
On Sunday 09 of May 2010 19:52:19 Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 09.05.2010 19:37, schrieb Thomas Bächler: > > Am 09.05.2010 19:23, schrieb Pierre Schmitz: > >> I noticed the same. But this is caused by the mkinitcpio update and not > >> the kernel. In my case "logo.nologo" in the kernel parameter line