On So, 2010-04-04 at 08:54 -0400, Michael Wigren wrote:
> Maybe try backing up and then
> removing .gconf and .gconfd?
That does indeed work, at least the annoying problem is gone. However I
don't want to re-configure my whole Gnome environment :(. Is there an
easy way to find out whats responsi
I wish I had something better to offer, but the desktop icons have been
working as expected for me. Maybe try backing up and then
removing .gconf and .gconfd?
On Sun, 2010-04-04 at 10:25 +0200, Karol Babioch wrote:
> On Fr, 2010-04-02 at 23:18 +0800, 甘露(Gan Lu) wrote:
> > I don't have such issue w
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 09:23:31AM +0200, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> You still need some install CD/Flash/whatewer to do the initial
> install and the current one is rather old. I had a lot of headache
> caused by the old installer, because I need kernel >=2.6.31 (IIRC
> installer contains 2.6.29 or
"release team" currently that means me.
yes, i'm working on new images.
see:
http://build.archlinux.org/isos/
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-releng/2010-March/thread.html
progress is rather slow, but there is not so much work anymore, so
they'll come..
Dieter
On Fr, 2010-04-02 at 23:18 +0800, 甘露(Gan Lu) wrote:
> I don't have such issue with the latest gnome.
So is there anyone who can think of possible reasons for this? Quite
annoying problem, I have reinstalled Gnome and Xorg several times, but
it still persists :(.
--
Best regards,
Karol Babioch
>> You still need some install CD/Flash/whatewer to do the initial
>> install and the current one is rather old. I had a lot of headache
>> caused by the old installer, because I need kernel >=2.6.31 (IIRC
>> installer contains 2.6.29 or 2.6.30) to install Arch on my notebook.
> archboot isos conta
Am Sonntag 04 April 2010 schrieb Lukáš Jirkovský:
> On 4 April 2010 00:01, wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 05:59:18PM -0400, Keith Hinton wrote:
> >> First of all, if anyone is curious as to why I have posted to the
> >> Arch-General mailing list, I'm mainly doing this, in case any of the
> >>
On 4 April 2010 00:01, wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 05:59:18PM -0400, Keith Hinton wrote:
>
>> First of all, if anyone is curious as to why I have posted to the
>> Arch-General mailing list, I'm mainly doing this, in case any of the
>> Arch Release team is actually hanging out on this list.
>
8 matches
Mail list logo