Re: [arch-general] The libgmp update

On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 09:21:51 +1000 Allan McRae wrote: > On 28/03/10 08:19, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > > Am Samstag, 27. März 2010 23:08:08 schrieb Hilton Medeiros: > >> Hello, > >> > >> just to confirm, all the packages linked against the new libgmp > >> should follow 'coreutils' example and use 'gm

Re: [arch-general] The libgmp update

On 28/03/10 08:19, Pierre Schmitz wrote: Am Samstag, 27. März 2010 23:08:08 schrieb Hilton Medeiros: Hello, just to confirm, all the packages linked against the new libgmp should follow 'coreutils' example and use 'gmp>=5.0', right? I just saw that gnunet didn't. Cheers, Hilton No, it's the

Re: [arch-general] The libgmp update

Am Samstag, 27. März 2010 23:08:08 schrieb Hilton Medeiros: > Hello, > > just to confirm, all the packages linked against the new libgmp should > follow 'coreutils' example and use 'gmp>=5.0', right? > I just saw that gnunet didn't. > > Cheers, > Hilton No, it's the other way round. Using versio

Re: [arch-general] The libgmp update

On 03/28/2010 12:08 AM, Hilton Medeiros wrote: Hello, just to confirm, all the packages linked against the new libgmp should follow 'coreutils' example and use 'gmp>=5.0', right? I just saw that gnunet didn't. Cheers, Hilton is not a rule that we have to have this restriction. some maintainer

[arch-general] The libgmp update

Hello, just to confirm, all the packages linked against the new libgmp should follow 'coreutils' example and use 'gmp>=5.0', right? I just saw that gnunet didn't. Cheers, Hilton

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] grep-2.6.1-1

2010/3/27 Jan de Groot > On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 22:57 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > > Upstream bug fix release. > > > > Signoff both, > > Allan > > Signoff x86_64. > > On my computer (x86_64), "grep -r a ." segfault, with grep 2.6.1-1. "echo a | grep a" works without problems.