Re: [arch-general] Gnome/Gtk-2.0 BLING! (list of surprisingly cool themes)

2010-02-27 Thread Brendan Long
On 02/26/2010 12:50 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > Listmates, > > I stumbled across some absolutely killer gtk-2.0 & metacity themes that > caught > my eye. If you use gnome, Xfce, etc.., give them a try and I guarantee you, > you > will be blown away. They are available at gnome-look or Xfce

Re: [arch-general] Gnome/Gtk-2.0 BLING! (list of surprisingly cool themes)

2010-02-27 Thread Adriano Moura
This is your lucky day! I've just made this light theme, for you! http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php/Soft+Metal?content=120867 Sorry for the mid-topic propaganda, but I don't want to open a new topic about themes. Seems fine to share here some more :) 2010/2/26 Nilesh Govindarajan : > On Sa

Re: [arch-general] kernel 2.6.33-1

2010-02-27 Thread Tavian Barnes
On 27 February 2010 21:57, Ignacio Galmarino wrote: > On 02/27/2010 03:43 PM, Ignacio Galmarino wrote: >> On 02/27/2010 03:34 PM, Gary Wright wrote: >>> On 02/27/2010 02:31 PM, Ignacio Galmarino wrote: On 02/27/2010 03:09 PM, Andreas Radke wrote: > Am Sat, 27 Feb 2010 21:21:57 +0100 >

Re: [arch-general] kernel 2.6.33-1

2010-02-27 Thread Ignacio Galmarino
On 02/27/2010 03:43 PM, Ignacio Galmarino wrote: > On 02/27/2010 03:34 PM, Gary Wright wrote: >> On 02/27/2010 02:31 PM, Ignacio Galmarino wrote: >>> On 02/27/2010 03:09 PM, Andreas Radke wrote: Am Sat, 27 Feb 2010 21:21:57 +0100 schrieb Thomas Bächler: > Am 27.02.2010 17:10, sch

[arch-general] FYI: PPPoE with ppp script

2010-02-27 Thread Damjan Georgievski
This is a script I use to connect to PPPoE with plain pppd... it expects the corresponding variables: INTERFACE, USERNAME and PASSWORD set up beforehand. /usr/sbin/pppd plugin rp-pppoe $INTERFACE \ user "$USERNAME" password "$PASSWORD" \ noipdefault noauth defaultroute default-asyncmap \

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] kernel 2.6.33-1

2010-02-27 Thread Damjan Georgievski
> this makes me curious. how do you test this? > dmesg > dmesg-before > > dmesg > dmesg-after > > diff dmesg-* ? > or is there a better way? > what's the recommended approach too see "what's new" ? I usually do "dmesg -c" which clears the ring buffer, and then start testing whatever I'm testing,

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Clean up the base group

2010-02-27 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:18:32 -0500 schrieb Loui Chang : > Rp-pppoe doesn't need to stay in base to remain in core though. It > should be available to install via CD-ROM if it's in core. Can the rp-pppoe scripts also be run from the LiveCD's shell before starting the installation if it's not in ba

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Clean up the base group

2010-02-27 Thread Loui Chang
On Sun 28 Feb 2010 01:59 +0530, Gaurish Sharma wrote: > rp-pppoe should not be removed, Its very handy and easy to use tool. > It was using it this tool I was able to connect the internet in > ArchLinux. without it I won't be able to install arch. the alternative > ppp is hard to configure. Rp-ppp

Re: [arch-general] kernel 2.6.33-1

2010-02-27 Thread Mauro Santos
> The mirrors should get the rebuilt/updated packages soon. Please report > if KMS is working for you. KMS is very soon freezing my desktop without > entries in Xorg or everything log file :( If you mean: ati-dri-7.7-2 libdrm-2.4.18-3 libgl-7.7-2 mesa-7.7-2 xf86-video-ati-6.12.99.git20100227-1 xo

Re: [arch-general] kernel 2.6.33-1

2010-02-27 Thread Ignacio Galmarino
On 02/27/2010 03:34 PM, Gary Wright wrote: > On 02/27/2010 02:31 PM, Ignacio Galmarino wrote: >> On 02/27/2010 03:09 PM, Andreas Radke wrote: >>> Am Sat, 27 Feb 2010 21:21:57 +0100 >>> schrieb Thomas Bächler: >>> Am 27.02.2010 17:10, schrieb Mauro Santos: >> Arch Linux changes: >> - ch

Re: [arch-general] kernel 2.6.33-1

2010-02-27 Thread Gary Wright
On 02/27/2010 02:31 PM, Ignacio Galmarino wrote: On 02/27/2010 03:09 PM, Andreas Radke wrote: Am Sat, 27 Feb 2010 21:21:57 +0100 schrieb Thomas Bächler: Am 27.02.2010 17:10, schrieb Mauro Santos: Arch Linux changes: - changed radeon kms enabled by default Anyone taking care of the libdrm, m

Re: [arch-general] kernel 2.6.33-1

2010-02-27 Thread Ignacio Galmarino
On 02/27/2010 03:09 PM, Andreas Radke wrote: > Am Sat, 27 Feb 2010 21:21:57 +0100 > schrieb Thomas Bächler : > >> Am 27.02.2010 17:10, schrieb Mauro Santos: Arch Linux changes: - changed radeon kms enabled by default >>> >>> Anyone taking care of the libdrm, mesa, libgl, ati-dri and >>>

Re: [arch-general] kernel 2.6.33-1

2010-02-27 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Sat, 27 Feb 2010 21:21:57 +0100 schrieb Thomas Bächler : > Am 27.02.2010 17:10, schrieb Mauro Santos: > >> Arch Linux changes: > >> - changed radeon kms enabled by default > > > > Anyone taking care of the libdrm, mesa, libgl, ati-dri and > > xf86-video-ati rebuild so all the benefits of kms c

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Clean up the base group

2010-02-27 Thread Gaurish Sharma
Hi, rp-pppoe should not be removed, Its very handy and easy to use tool. It was using it this tool I was able to connect the internet in ArchLinux. without it I won't be able to install arch. the alternative ppp is hard to configure. I am strongly against this, would recommend not touching rp-pppo

Re: [arch-general] kernel 2.6.33-1

2010-02-27 Thread Ray Kohler
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi guys, > kernel 2.6.33 first test run ... > > Upstream changes: > http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges > > Arch Linux bugfixes/feature requests: > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/18249 # added HPET > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17970

Re: [arch-general] kernel 2.6.33-1

2010-02-27 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 27.02.2010 17:10, schrieb Mauro Santos: >> Arch Linux changes: >> - changed radeon kms enabled by default > > Anyone taking care of the libdrm, mesa, libgl, ati-dri and > xf86-video-ati rebuild so all the benefits of kms can be fully used? As > far as I know it is needed to make this work as we

Re: [arch-general] kernel 2.6.33-1

2010-02-27 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 27.02.2010 17:10, schrieb Roman Kyrylych: >> Arch Linux changes: >> - merged ext2/ext3 support into ext4 module > When there is ext2/ext3 in MODULES in mkinitcpio.conf > instead of filesystem in HOOKS (as on my VPS), > then image that is automatically regenerated during > kernel26 package update

Re: [arch-general] ld-2.11.1.so and segfaults

2010-02-27 Thread christopher floess
It shouldn't. At one point I had a 32 bit Ubuntu, 64bit Arch, and WinXP 32, all booting from the same bootloader (Ubuntu's grub) and they all worked fine. Whenever I bork something beyond repair, I just chalk it up to the price of cutting edge software. That, and I can be back up in an id

Re: [arch-general] kernel 2.6.33-1

2010-02-27 Thread Mauro Santos
> Works great ... but no ATI 3d. > > libdrm, mesa, libgl, ati-dri and xf86-video-ati need to be rebuild to > use dri2 > > Ignacio > > The new kernel seems to work just fine on all my machines, however there is no kms love. Booting without recompiling anything makes xdriinfo say there is no dr

Re: [arch-general] kernel 2.6.33-1

2010-02-27 Thread Ignacio Galmarino
On 02/27/2010 08:46 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi guys, > kernel 2.6.33 first test run ... > Works great ... but no ATI 3d. libdrm, mesa, libgl, ati-dri and xf86-video-ati need to be rebuild to use dri2 Ignacio signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [arch-general] kernel 2.6.33-1

2010-02-27 Thread Roman Kyrylych
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 16:46, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi guys, > kernel 2.6.33 first test run ... > Arch Linux bugfixes/feature requests: > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16715 # added Linux Container support Nice! > Arch Linux changes: > - merged ext2/ext3 support into ext4 module When ther

Re: [arch-general] kernel 2.6.33-1

2010-02-27 Thread Mauro Santos
On 02/27/2010 02:46 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi guys, > kernel 2.6.33 first test run ... > > Upstream changes: > http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges > > Arch Linux bugfixes/feature requests: > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/18249 # added HPET > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17970 # adde

[arch-general] mkinitcpio 0.6.3-1 and raid hook

2010-02-27 Thread Mathieu Clabaut
It looks like mkinitcpio.conf till mention the "raid" hook whereas it looks like it has been superseded by "mdadm" hook Indeed : >>> Generating initial ramdisk, using mkinitcpio. Please wait... ==> Building image "default" ==> Running command: /sbin/mkinitcpio -k 2.6.32-ARCH -c /etc/mkinitcp

[arch-general] kernel 2.6.33-1

2010-02-27 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Hi guys, kernel 2.6.33 first test run ... Upstream changes: http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges Arch Linux bugfixes/feature requests: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/18249 # added HPET http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17970 # added CONFIG_USB_GSPCA_PAC7302 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17791 # a

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Replace Planet wit h Planet-Venus?

2010-02-27 Thread Pierre Chapuis
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 00:21:05 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > Nope. It is still an issue. I made two posts since the update and they > are the only two posts of mine on the feed. There was two others on > there earlier and they dropped off. So the current setup does only > display two posts from

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Replace Planet with Planet-Venus?

2010-02-27 Thread Allan McRae
On 27/02/10 23:06, Allan McRae wrote: On 27/02/10 22:57, Pierre Chapuis wrote: On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:56:50 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: The setup seems to post the last two post form each person, no matter how long ago they were. That means we get a couple of posts from 2006 at the bottom of the

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Clean up the base group

2010-02-27 Thread Pierre Chapuis
(Forked from arch-dev-public) On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:40:27 +0200, Roman Kyrylych wrote: > The following packages are questionable: > * diffutils - why it should be on every system? > * gawk - why it should be on every system? > [...] > * mailx > [...] > * vi - ok, no bikeshed thing here, but the

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Replace Planet with Planet-Venus?

2010-02-27 Thread Allan McRae
On 27/02/10 22:57, Pierre Chapuis wrote: On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:56:50 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: The setup seems to post the last two post form each person, no matter how long ago they were. That means we get a couple of posts from 2006 at the bottom of the page. Also, people who post quite fr

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Replace Planet wit h Planet-Venus?

2010-02-27 Thread Pierre Chapuis
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:56:50 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > > The setup seems to post the last two post form each person, no matter > how long ago they were. That means we get a couple of posts from 2006 > at the bottom of the page. Also, people who post quite frequently (e.g. > cactus) will onl

Re: [arch-general] svn / kwallet integration broken

2010-02-27 Thread John Black
On 02/26/2010 06:06 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote: Not sure if the cause is recent upgrades to svn, or the recent upgrade to the KDE 4.4 beta, but svn integration with kwallet as a password store doesn't seem to be working anymore. Anyone else seeing this and/or have any idea what's up? Thanks, DR

Re: [arch-general] Gnome/Gtk-2.0 BLING! (list of surprisingly cool themes)

2010-02-27 Thread Ray Rashif
On 27 February 2010 12:08, Michishige Kaito wrote: > Actually, dark themes can be easy on the eyes, I've found. But they gotta be > well done, cos otherrwise they just look weird. 95% of dark themes/skins on the WWW is poorly done. It's difficult to create one properly; you need the correct balan

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Samba package sizes

2010-02-27 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am Samstag 27 Februar 2010 schrieb Xavier Chantry: > On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Rogutės Sparnuotos > > wrote: > > Dan McGee (2010-02-26 19:09): > >> Guys, does anyone else think this is getting out of hand? > > > > <...> > > > >> Seriously, 45 f-ing MB for samba? How can that be possible

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Samba package sizes

2010-02-27 Thread Xavier Chantry
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Rogutės Sparnuotos wrote: > Dan McGee (2010-02-26 19:09): >> Guys, does anyone else think this is getting out of hand? > <...> >> Seriously, 45 f-ing MB for samba? How can that be possible? > <...> > > Samba is growing up fast. > It is long known upstream ( http:/

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Samba package sizes

2010-02-27 Thread Rogutės Sparnuotos
Dan McGee (2010-02-26 19:09): > Guys, does anyone else think this is getting out of hand? <...> > Seriously, 45 f-ing MB for samba? How can that be possible? <...> Samba is growing up fast. It is long known upstream ( http://bugs.debian.org/474543 ) and already anecdotal: http://lists.samba.org/a