On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 8:52 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 3:36 AM, Eric Bélanger
> wrote:
>
>> for arch in ${arch...@]}; do
>>
>> + IS_LOCKED=0
>> + count=0
>> + while [ $count -le $LOCK_TRIAL ]; do
>> + if repo_lock $reponame $arch ; then
>> + IS_LOCKED=1
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 6:47 AM, André Ramaciotti <
andre.ramacio...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I've found something interestingly weird. The output of ls -lh
> /dev/input/by-id shows that this keyboard has three /dev/input entries:
> /dev/input/event14, /dev/input/event15 and /dev/input/js0 (?) . Even
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 3:36 AM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> for arch in ${arch...@]}; do
>
> + IS_LOCKED=0
> + count=0
> + while [ $count -le $LOCK_TRIAL ]; do
> + if repo_lock $reponame $arch ; then
> + IS_LOCKED=1
> + let count=$LOCK_TRIAL+1
> + continue
I'd just use a 'break
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Celti wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 17:32, André Ramaciotti
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Andre Ramaciotti <
> > andre.ramacio...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Celti writes:
> >>
> >> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 15:38, Andre Ramaciotti
> >> > wrot
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 17:32, André Ramaciotti
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Andre Ramaciotti <
> andre.ramacio...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Celti writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 15:38, Andre Ramaciotti
>> > wrote:
>> >> Celti writes:
>> >>
>> >>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 15:23
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Andre Ramaciotti <
andre.ramacio...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Celti writes:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 15:38, Andre Ramaciotti
> > wrote:
> >> Celti writes:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 15:23, Celti wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 15:19, Andre Ramaciot
On 02/25/2010 02:15 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
Perhaps. I see now that the .pkg.tar.xz is identical to mine EXCEPT for
that line... I must have copied from script-defaults at some point in
the pass. In any case, I've removed that line and it still seems to work
fine... I'm guessing it takes the value f
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 01:54 +0200, Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 02/25/2010 01:42 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 01:30 +0200, Ionut Biru wrote:
> >>
> >> maybe you did that modification since in our package is not such thing
> >> in /etc/schroot/scripts-arch32.
> >>
> >> grep -l NSSDATABAS
On 02/25/2010 01:42 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 01:30 +0200, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 02/25/2010 12:48 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 18:05 +0100, Giovanni Scafora wrote:
2010/2/24, Ionut Biru:
all done. i had to patch it. i don't use it so please report back if is
w
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 01:30 +0200, Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 02/25/2010 12:48 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 18:05 +0100, Giovanni Scafora wrote:
> >> 2010/2/24, Ionut Biru:
> >>> all done. i had to patch it. i don't use it so please report back if is
> >>> working well
> >>
> >> Tha
On 02/25/2010 12:48 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 18:05 +0100, Giovanni Scafora wrote:
2010/2/24, Ionut Biru:
all done. i had to patch it. i don't use it so please report back if is
working well
Thanks Ionut.
We needs testers for the new schroot.
Let us know.
Just tested it,
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 00:07 +0100, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 06:48:01AM +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 18:05 +0100, Giovanni Scafora wrote:
> >
> > > We needs testers for the new schroot.
>
> Reading this thread really made me wonder if it
> was a
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 06:48:01AM +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 18:05 +0100, Giovanni Scafora wrote:
>
> > We needs testers for the new schroot.
Reading this thread really made me wonder if it
was about some tool to recycle old and decaying
code or something similar. In Dutch
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 18:05 +0100, Giovanni Scafora wrote:
> 2010/2/24, Ionut Biru :
> > all done. i had to patch it. i don't use it so please report back if is
> > working well
>
> Thanks Ionut.
> We needs testers for the new schroot.
> Let us know.
Just tested it, skype loads up properly, as
Celti writes:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 15:38, Andre Ramaciotti
> wrote:
>> Celti writes:
>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 15:23, Celti wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 15:19, Andre Ramaciotti
wrote:
> Daenyth Blank writes:
>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 16:34, Andre Ramaciotti
>>>
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 15:38, Andre Ramaciotti
wrote:
> Celti writes:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 15:23, Celti wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 15:19, Andre Ramaciotti
>>> wrote:
Daenyth Blank writes:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 16:34, Andre Ramaciotti
> wrote:
>> as in "th
Celti writes:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 15:23, Celti wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 15:19, Andre Ramaciotti
>> wrote:
>>> Daenyth Blank writes:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 16:34, Andre Ramaciotti
wrote:
> as in "they don't show any keycode
> on 'xev' or 'showkey'".
Celti writes:
> Likely they don't have a kernel mapping, so X doesn't even see them.
> You'll need to get their scancodes with `showkeys`, and map them to
> keycodes with `setkeycodes`, while out of X.
>
> ~celti
As I said, they don't show a keycode on 'showkeys'. I think I need a
hack at a lower
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 15:23, Celti wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 15:19, Andre Ramaciotti
> wrote:
>> Daenyth Blank writes:
>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 16:34, Andre Ramaciotti
>>> wrote:
as in "they don't show any keycode
on 'xev' or 'showkey'".
>>>
>>> It sounds like those keys a
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 15:19, Andre Ramaciotti
wrote:
> Daenyth Blank writes:
>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 16:34, Andre Ramaciotti
>> wrote:
>>> as in "they don't show any keycode
>>> on 'xev' or 'showkey'".
>>
>> It sounds like those keys are broken. It should be sending something. Is it
>> old
Daenyth Blank writes:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 16:34, Andre Ramaciotti
> wrote:
>> as in "they don't show any keycode
>> on 'xev' or 'showkey'".
>
> It sounds like those keys are broken. It should be sending something. Is it
> old?
It's barely used. I don't think the keys are broken, most pro
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:18:28 +0100
> Jan de Groot wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 23:21 +0100, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
>> > Just poked around with grub2 and kvm,
>> > you really need the extra space, else it will fail to install.
>> >
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 16:34, Andre Ramaciotti
wrote:
> as in "they don't show any keycode
> on 'xev' or 'showkey'".
It sounds like those keys are broken. It should be sending something. Is it old?
Hi all,
I have a Microsoft keyboard (*hides*) and some of its multimedia keys
don't work (most of them do, though), as in "they don't show any keycode
on 'xev' or 'showkey'". I don't really think I'll get them to work, but
I'll ask anyway: is there any hack to make them work? It's a Digital
Media
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:18:28 +0100
Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 23:21 +0100, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> > Just poked around with grub2 and kvm,
> > you really need the extra space, else it will fail to install.
> > creating partitions with cfdisk will also leave this space.
>
>
Thanks for all the quick replies!
I was actually missing base-devel ^_^
2010/2/24 gt
> Wow did all of you post simultaneously ;)
>
26 matches
Mail list logo
