Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

Steve Holmes wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: RIPEMD160 > > I don't know much about the licenses differences and all that crap but > I experienced a problem with cdrecord several years ago where it would > not work with my CD burner. I kept getting wiere I/O errors or some > s

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 I don't know much about the licenses differences and all that crap but I experienced a problem with cdrecord several years ago where it would not work with my CD burner. I kept getting wiere I/O errors or some such. When I asked around,some peop

Re: [arch-general] Netcfg after resume from suspend

On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 17:00 +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 29.01.2010 02:42, schrieb Ng Oon-Ee: > > Hi all, I'm using netcfg and recently have been noticing the following. > > > > When I resume from suspend I call 'netcfg home' which tries to connect > > to my home's wifi network. ESSID and WEP

Re: [arch-general] kernel26-2.6.32.6-1 updates breaks Compiz?

On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 13:19 +0200, Ionut Biru wrote: > On 01/29/2010 10:33 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > > > > Update, I've found that disabling the 'png' plugin under the 'Image > > Loading' section "fixes" the issue, at least compiz loads up and ru

Re: [arch-general] Little problems with arch

On 01/29/2010 11:59 PM, Andrea Crotti wrote: I have a little dell 10 with archlinux. Unfortunately the audio and 3d are not really working, I tried hard some time ago but with no luck, anyway other problems are more annoying. - time getting crazy Every time I reboot this little machine the d

[arch-general] Little problems with arch

I have a little dell 10 with archlinux. Unfortunately the audio and 3d are not really working, I tried hard some time ago but with no luck, anyway other problems are more annoying. - time getting crazy Every time I reboot this little machine the date is set somehow randomly. Any idea of what

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

So, are we going to switch to cdrtools? Best regards, Luís Moreira.

Re: [arch-general] Laptop reboots instead of resume from suspend

On 01/29/2010 09:46 PM, Dave Morgan wrote: I'm using an Inspiron 1720, GeForce 8600M GT, Arch i686. If I update to any kernel after 2.6.31.6-1 then the laptop reboots from suspend or hibernate. According to pm-suspend.log the suspend was fine and there are n problems in the other logs. It just

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

At Freitag, 29. Januar 2010 18:55 Joerg Schilling wrote: > BTW: cdrecord in this mode is unsafe as it does not manages the fine grained > privileges but would need to give up cap_dac_override before it tries to open > other files. If you don't give up cap_dac_override, cdecord can read any > loc

[arch-general] Laptop reboots instead of resume from suspend

I'm using an Inspiron 1720, GeForce 8600M GT, Arch i686. If I update to any kernel after 2.6.31.6-1 then the laptop reboots from suspend or hibernate. According to pm-suspend.log the suspend was fine and there are n problems in the other logs. It just reboots. Anyone else seen this, or any sugg

Re: [arch-general] ndesk-dbus 0.6.0 bugfix

On 01/29/2010 05:54 PM, Angel Velásquez wrote: On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Andrea Fagiani wrote: Bug #377672 I stumbled upon this while trying to suspend my laptop using Gnome-DO's Gnome-session plugin. It may also cause problems with

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

Am Freitag, 29. Januar 2010 18:47:55 schrieb Xavier Chantry: > When I looked into that a few months ago, it stored just fine when > creating the archive. But it did not restore them when extracting. > This got fixed in trunk, so it will probably be in the next major > release (2.8 ?). > http://code

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

Attila wrote: > At Freitag, 29. Januar 2010 11:39 Joerg Schilling wrote: > > Thanks for your nice informations and with this line for setcap > > cap_dac_override,cap_sys_rawio,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_nice,cap_net_bind_service+ep > > > a "cdrecord --scanbus" works as normal user without a problem.

Re: [arch-general] ndesk-dbus 0.6.0 bugfix

On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Andrea Fagiani wrote: > Bug #377672 > > I stumbled upon this while trying to suspend my laptop using Gnome-DO's > Gnome-session plugin. It may also cause problems with other C# apps. > There's a quick fix for this

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

At Freitag, 29. Januar 2010 14:10 Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Finally some interesting discussion came out of this. I am not an expert on > linux capability support, but Thomas has posted two blog entries about this in > Arch: http://archlinux.me/brain0/2009/07/28/using-posix-capabilities-in-linux-

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

At Freitag, 29. Januar 2010 11:39 Joerg Schilling wrote: Thanks for your nice informations and with this line for setcap cap_dac_override,cap_sys_rawio,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_nice,cap_net_bind_service+ep a "cdrecord --scanbus" works as normal user without a problem. > As long as there is no sup

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Finally some interesting discussion came out of this. I am not an expert on > linux capability support, but Thomas has posted two blog entries about this in > Arch: http://archlinux.me/brain0/2009/07/28/using-posix-capabilities-in-linux- > p

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

Le Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:36:58 +, Pierre Chapuis a écrit : > Le Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:58:42 +0100, > Jan de Groot a écrit : > > > Implementing it in star has no use, as our package manager doesn't use > > star but libarchive, the library that bsdtar is based on. > > Technically the PKGBUILD co

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

Le Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:58:42 +0100, Jan de Groot a écrit : > Implementing it in star has no use, as our package manager doesn't use > star but libarchive, the library that bsdtar is based on. Technically the PKGBUILD could makedepends('star') and use it to extract the source with ACL support...

[arch-general] ndesk-dbus 0.6.0 bugfix

Bug #377672 I stumbled upon this while trying to suspend my laptop using Gnome-DO's Gnome-session plugin. It may also cause problems with other C# apps. There's a quick fix for this in the first post of the launchpad's bug report : --- ndes

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling) wrote: > > This might be related: > > http://code.google.com/p/libarchive/wiki/TarPosix1eACLs > > This does just describe what I defined 10 years ago ;-) I forgot, the complete documentation is here: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/man/st

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Am Freitag, 29. Januar 2010 17:58:42 schrieb Jan de Groot: > > On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 14:35 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > > I am not sure whether this is the best solution. I recommend to use > > > star as star > > > is the oldest free tar implementation and as it suppo

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

Am Freitag, 29. Januar 2010 17:58:42 schrieb Jan de Groot: > On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 14:35 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > I am not sure whether this is the best solution. I recommend to use > > star as star > > is the oldest free tar implementation and as it supports ACLs since 10 > > years > > al

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 14:35 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: > I am not sure whether this is the best solution. I recommend to use > star as star > is the oldest free tar implementation and as it supports ACLs since 10 > years > already. Adding more meta data is relatively simple. Implementing it in

Re: [arch-general] Netcfg after resume from suspend

Am 29.01.2010 02:42, schrieb Ng Oon-Ee: > Hi all, I'm using netcfg and recently have been noticing the following. > > When I resume from suspend I call 'netcfg home' which tries to connect > to my home's wifi network. ESSID and WEP key are correctly set. It > exist with a 'could not obtain IP addr

Re: [arch-general] Netcfg after resume from suspend

On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 10:36 -0500, Alexander Lam wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > > Hi all, I'm using netcfg and recently have been noticing the following. > > > > When I resume from suspend I call 'netcfg home' which tries to connect > > to my home's wifi network. ESSI

Re: [arch-general] Netcfg after resume from suspend

On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > Hi all, I'm using netcfg and recently have been noticing the following. > > When I resume from suspend I call 'netcfg home' which tries to connect > to my home's wifi network. ESSID and WEP key are correctly set. It > exist with a 'could not obta

Re: [arch-general] [aur-general] PKGBUILD for python-numpy, orphaned and out-of-date

On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Puneeth Chaganti wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Robson Peixoto > wrote: >> Please, >> add gcc-fortran in makedepends > > Sorry, missed it. > > thanks > punchagan > Oh I used to maintain numpy when it was in [community] (dsa used to maintain it first,

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Finally some interesting discussion came out of this. I am not an expert on > linux capability support, but Thomas has posted two blog entries about this > in > Arch: http://archlinux.me/brain0/2009/07/28/using-posix-capabilities-in-linux- > part-one/ and http://archlin

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling) wrote: > ludovic coues wrote: > > > Dev don't care about technical basis. > > They are ok with the fact that 13 releases per year is better than only one > > each single year. > > During the past 4 years, the average was 176.5 releases per yea

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

Am Freitag, 29. Januar 2010 11:58:12 schrieb Joerg Schilling: > Paulo Matias wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Joerg Schilling > > > > wrote: > > > As long as there is no support code in Linux distros to set > > > capabilities without making the target program suid root anyway, > > >

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

ludovic coues wrote: > Dev don't care about technical basis. > They are ok with the fact that 13 releases per year is better than only one > each single year. During the past 4 years, the average was 176.5 releases per year ;-) Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schi

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

Attila wrote: > At Donnerstag, 28. Januar 2010 08:35 Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > > > Hi, don't need all root privileges/capabilities. Only cap_sys_admin, > > cap_sys_rawio for some special SCSI commands and cap_sys_resource for > > incresing resource limits. > > > > setcap cap_sys_admin,ca

Re: [arch-general] kernel26-lts won't install

On 01/29/2010 12:25 AM, Gaurish Sharma wrote: Hi, the i686 Arch does have udev-compat 150. So I am guess you are building for x86_64 Arch.udev-compat 150 is still in [Testing][1] Either wait for it or Enable [Testing] Repository [1] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/testing/x86_64/udev-compat/

Re: [arch-general] kernel26-2.6.32.6-1 updates breaks Compiz?

On 01/29/2010 10:33 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:38 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: Guys, After updates today on my x86_64 box from testing, including kernel26-2.6.32.6-1, Compiz is broken. It attempts to start, but then all

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

Paulo Matias wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Joerg Schilling > wrote: > > As long as there is no support code in Linux distros to set > > capabilities without making the target program suid root anyway, > > Don't be afraid, Arch Linux has support for that :) How? Is there support for

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote: > As long as there is no support code in Linux distros to set > capabilities without making the target program suid root anyway, Don't be afraid, Arch Linux has support for that :) BTW, congratulations and thanks for your software. I use cd

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

Attila wrote: > At Donnerstag, 28. Januar 2010 10:22 Joerg Schilling wrote: > > I don't find the most of your sugestions in "man 7 capabilities". > > > file_dac_read Permission to open any device file > = cap_dac_readsearch ?? Most likely CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE > > sys_devices Permission to se

Re: [arch-general] kernel26-2.6.32.6-1 updates breaks Compiz?

On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:38 AM, David C. Rankin > wrote: >> Guys, >> >> After updates today on my x86_64 box from testing, including >> kernel26-2.6.32.6-1, Compiz is broken. It attempts to start, but then all >> windows are left without an