Hi all!
I've posted on forum (http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=88509)
that the package extra/cegui was out of date and then was instructed
by Allan to post the modified PKGBUILD on the mailing list.
Basically, I just modified the version, the license file location and
md5sums. Also, a st
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Jeff Horelick wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have a suggestion to possibly make rebuilds a bit less painful (or
> non-existant). I think this is a good idea because it seems like right now,
> even before there was a new rebuild (ffmpeg/x264) in testing, there's
> already
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 01:08:10PM -0500, Jeff Horelick wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have a suggestion to possibly make rebuilds a bit less painful (or
> non-existant). I think this is a good idea because it seems like right now,
> even before there was a new rebuild (ffmpeg/x264) in testing, there's
>
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Jeff Horelick wrote:
>
> 2. pacman -Qm has 2 flaws that i see. For one, it'll also list all your AUR
> packages, it'd be nice to maybe just list packages that were installed from
> the repos but are no longer there and ignore any manually installed
> packages. For
2010/1/10 Xavier
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Jeff Horelick wrote:
> > This would likely require 2 changes to pacman to implement:
> > 1. Pacman would have to know that libpng8 is the newer version of libpng7
> > and prompt users to install that (or do it as a upgrade keeping the old
> > p
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Jeff Horelick wrote:
> This would likely require 2 changes to pacman to implement:
> 1. Pacman would have to know that libpng8 is the newer version of libpng7
> and prompt users to install that (or do it as a upgrade keeping the old
> package).
Is that needed ? Ne
Hey all,
I have a suggestion to possibly make rebuilds a bit less painful (or
non-existant). I think this is a good idea because it seems like right now,
even before there was a new rebuild (ffmpeg/x264) in testing, there's
already another on the horizon (linjpeg/libpng, and it's a big one) and wh
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010, Xavier wrote:
Maybe the average arch user also wants to do that, I don't know.
You can do some research to find out what the big distrib are using in
their default kernel (fedora,suse,debian,ubuntu,...) and/or you can
open a bug in Flyspray.
Since I didn't get any replies h
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 14:20:32 +0100
Daniel Isenmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is just a small fix for FS#13876 -[rp-pppoe] package: .so file
> in /etc (http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13876).
> The kernel-mode plugin is now under /usr/lib/rp-pppoe/rp-pppoe.so and
> the initial config file /etc/ppp/ppp
Am Sonntag 10 Januar 2010 schrieb Simon Boulay:
> On 01/10/2010 09:48 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> > Am Samstag 09 Januar 2010 schrieb Simon Boulay:
> >> On 01/09/2010 09:09 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> >>> Am Samstag 09 Januar 2010 schrieb Dan McGee:
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Tob
On 01/10/2010 09:48 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Am Samstag 09 Januar 2010 schrieb Simon Boulay:
On 01/09/2010 09:09 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Am Samstag 09 Januar 2010 schrieb Dan McGee:
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Yes will change the install message
On 10/01/2010 11:28 πμ, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 01/10/2010 09:34 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
I just did my -Syu and saw pidgin had been version-bumped to 2.6.5.
Since my connection is dog-slow, I browsed to pidgin.im while waiting
for the download to finish (I like to check change-logs). Lo and behold,
t
On 01/10/2010 09:34 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
I just did my -Syu and saw pidgin had been version-bumped to 2.6.5.
Since my connection is dog-slow, I browsed to pidgin.im while waiting
for the download to finish (I like to check change-logs). Lo and behold,
the version advertised on Pidgin's official
Am Samstag 09 Januar 2010 schrieb Simon Boulay:
> On 01/09/2010 09:09 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> > Am Samstag 09 Januar 2010 schrieb Dan McGee:
> >> On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> >>> > Yes will change the install message.
>
> Yes there is no mention i
14 matches
Mail list logo
