Aniruddha wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 03:10 -0600, David C. Rankin wrote:
>
>> Anybody got a favorite open-source accounting package that would be good to
>> test?
>>
>
> http://www.gnucash.org
>
I've looked at it before -- years back and it wasn't quite there yet. I'll have
another look,
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Heiko Baums wrote:
>
> I vote for fcron because it has dcron and anacron features. Two
> separate packages is indeed a regression and not really KISS like
> because anacron can only do anacron and dcron can only do dcron while
> fcron can do both. And on a desktop s
Loui Chang wrote:
>I manually changed the ID.
>The package should appear on the web site now.
Thank you. I was wondering "who did the magic setting the category to system?"
> How did you upload your package?
slurpy -P -U
Without the -C option, it defaults category to NONE.
I uploaded three pa
Am Mon, 4 Jan 2010 07:35:35 +0100
schrieb Heiko Baums :
> I don't know bcron and yacron but I doubt that they have anacron
> features.
>
> Also fcron supports the
> directories /etc/cron.hourly, /etc/cron.daily, /etc/cron.weekly
> and /etc/cron.monthly. So it's very easy to configure cronjobs. No
Am Sun, 03 Jan 2010 23:23:28 -0500
schrieb Paul Mattal :
> Is there also an issue we're trying to solve with anacron? Can't we
> use bcron (or any other cron for that matter) and still use anacron
> separately?
>
> I understand that fcron could theoretically do the work of both, but
> don't see
Seems to be fine now.
Removed two lines of comments, rewrote description, renamed
libtre-notfound.patch to libtre.patch, and reuploaded... can't think of a
reason those could have caused any problem tho.
But one thing I recall is that I left the 'pkgdesc' empty the first commit.
More likely this wa
On Mon 04 Jan 2010 05:46 +0800, talki walki wrote:
> The following page of msort in AUR says "Package details could not be
> found."
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33319
>
> While one can fetch the package info using the rpc interface:
>
> wget 'http://aur.archlinux.org/rpc.php?type=sea
Am 03.01.2010 16:04, schrieb RedShift:
> Hi all
>
>
> Does anyone have a suggestion for some software, a tiny webserver that
> is able to run as root and execute CGI scripts? It should be smaller
> than apache and preferably even smaller than lighttpd. It doesn't need a
> whole lot of features, i
Hi,
I had a look at the 3.x version awhttpd. Select based(fast), small, cgi
scripts(fork based). Unfortunately this version is not maintained
anymore since the team moved on to 4.0 (heavy integration of a scheme
interpreter). 3.x is entirely ANSI C.
However, an even smaller version of the same c
Hi, all.
The following page of msort in AUR says "Package details could not be
found."
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33319
While one can fetch the package info using the rpc interface:
wget 'http://aur.archlinux.org/rpc.php?type=search&arg=msort' -q -O-
Also the tarball is available
maybe the tux webserver?
it runs in kernelspace (!) so it's very fast, but if it crashes...
Dieter
RedShift writes:
Hi all
Does anyone have a suggestion for some software, a tiny webserver that is
able to run as root and execute CGI scripts? It should be smaller than
apache and preferably even smaller than lighttpd. It doesn't need a whole
lot of features, it only needs to be able to execut
On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 03:10 -0600, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Anybody got a favorite open-source accounting package that would be good to
> test?
>
http://www.gnucash.org
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 10:04 AM, RedShift wrote:
> Hi all
>
>
> Does anyone have a suggestion for some software, a tiny webserver that is
> able to run as root and execute CGI scripts?
I speak under correction, but that seems wildly dangerous, and
something that a secure webserver would be design
Hi all
Does anyone have a suggestion for some software, a tiny webserver that is able
to run as root and execute CGI scripts? It should be smaller than apache and
preferably even smaller than lighttpd. It doesn't need a whole lot of features,
it only needs to be able to execute CGI scripts.
On 01/03/2010 02:11 AM, Arvid Picciani wrote:
On 01/02/2010 09:20 PM, Lars Tennstedt wrote:
Qt4 applications behave like KDE4 applications. The printer recognizes
the job and all it prints is a blank paper, sometimes with headline but
always without the body.
Does the same failure appear wh
16 matches
Mail list logo
