On 12/18/09, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Javier Vasquez
> wrote:
>> On 12/15/09, Ionut Biru wrote:
>>> On 12/15/2009 09:19 PM, Arvid Picciani wrote:
On 12/15/2009 07:37 AM, Jürgen Hagemann wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> thunderbird-3.0-3 has no gnomeui, no lightning.
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:58:54 -0500
Denis Kobozev wrote:
> Dieter, is it possible to resize existing partitions via PARTITIONS
> variable in the config file?
don't think so. it's meant to make new ones.
> What kind of error do you get if you put
> incorrect values there?
You'll get an error th
On Fri 18 Dec 2009 17:54 +0100, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> > I agree with Dieter, that the install should be measured by speed and
> > automation -- but long ago I realized that there a whole lot of other
> > people out there that just don't think like me :p
>
> Don't misunderstand me. An interact
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> The config files are so powerful you can just add whichever
> repositories you need and add packages/groups to install
> whatever you want.
> http://github.com/Dieterbe/aif/blob/master/examples/generic-install-on-sda
> This should also an
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Chris Brannon wrote:
> Pierre Chapuis writes:
>
>> There are things like that (think NDIS - it's Microsoft, but it's a
>> step in the right direction), just not enough , but I think it's a
>> question of time.
>
> And then there's the UDI (universal driver interfa
1)
> This begs the question: does arch really want users who can't get
> through the current installer? Isn't the user base Arch Linux is
> catering to one that /should/ understand this?
definitely. in fact, i think our current interactive installer is
already too complicated/userfriendly.
there
Pierre Chapuis writes:
> There are things like that (think NDIS - it's Microsoft, but it's a
> step in the right direction), just not enough , but I think it's a
> question of time.
And then there's the UDI (universal driver interface) (UDI), which Stallman
doesn't like. I can certainly see arg
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Damien Churchill wrote:
> Isn't this what POSIX was, albeit quite old now, but still a standard?
POSIX and the SUSv3 (Single Unix Specification)
Guys,
After the latest firefox updates, most of my themes were disabled and
new themes would not install. After the automatic update check tried to install
the Foxide Graphite theme, I found out why. During the install, I received a
messages telling me that firefox would not install th
I liked the Arch installer except I would liked to have a different
partitioner as I find the current one's interface to be quite
cumbersome in comparison to say the partitioner that is in the Debian
installer. Otherwise the Archlinux installer is very simple in my
opinion.
Best regards
Nicklas W
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 06:17, Allan McRae wrote:
> Good thing you signed that message... it would be a shame if we did not
> know that "+1" was definitely from you.
>
> Allan
>
+1
On 12/18/2009 01:26 AM, Damien Churchill wrote:
Isn't this what POSIX was, albeit quite old now, but still a standard?
imagine that: some people out there still think posix is THE standard
and people should read the spec BEFORE reimplementing basics in the name
of making things "cross platfo
There are things like that (think NDIS - it's Microsoft, but it's a
step in the right direction), just not enough , but I think it's a
question of time.
--
catwell
Le 18/12/2009 08:33, Magnus Therning a écrit :
> Go to http://enigmail.mozdev.org/download/index.php you'll be able to
> put in the combination "linux (x86_64)" and "Thunderbird 3.0" (thanks
> to a fellow Arch user it seems :-)
Hi there,
I'm the maintainer of the enigmail package on AUR, and I've
I think it's because computers develop too quickly to have it. Some of
the other things you mention such as building materials have been around
for years, even centuries, and are the way they are going to be. I
think if someone developed a bright new way of creating aluminum ingots
for instance,
Myles Green wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:40:24 -0600
Jonathan Temple wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:50 PM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
Seriously, I like the Arch installer just fine, but I can tell you
that the Ubuntu/SuSE install rating most lik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:40:24 -0600
Jonathan Temple wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:50 PM, David C. Rankin
> wrote:
> >
> > Seriously, I like the Arch installer just fine, but I can tell you
> > that the Ubuntu/SuSE install rating most likely com
> For example slabs of aluminium have standard sizes
I would guess there are at least 50 different standards available for
alu plates. But the difference to the computer world is, you can take
any of that plates, drill a hole and mount stuff.
> building materials have well defined specifications
2009/12/18 RedShift :
> Hi all
>
>
> It dawned on my that lots of industries have standards and companies
> generally keep to them. For example slabs of aluminium have standard sizes,
> building materials have well defined specifications, or take electrical
> components: there's a huge list of stan
Hi all
It dawned on my that lots of industries have standards and companies generally
keep to them. For example slabs of aluminium have standard sizes, building
materials have well defined specifications, or take electrical components:
there's a huge list of standardized components. You can e
20 matches
Mail list logo
