As far as I've understand the main problem, it's about mirror which are not
up-to-date.
So could it be possible to make a dummy package of the day ?
Every morning, the main server will produce a dummy package containing the
today's timestamp. So if the dummy package is 3 days old, this means that
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 14:33 -0700, Brendan Long wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 12:07 +0100, Jeroen Op 't Eynde wrote:
> > On 12/13/2009 10:02 AM, Nathan Wayde wrote:
> > > On 13/12/09 08:48, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > >> On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 03:31 -0500, Qadri wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> So should it be a fu
On 12/13/2009 10:33 PM, Brendan Long wrote:
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 12:07 +0100, Jeroen Op 't Eynde wrote:
On 12/13/2009 10:02 AM, Nathan Wayde wrote:
On 13/12/09 08:48, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 03:31 -0500, Qadri wrote:
So should it be a function of the program to make sure that
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 12:07 +0100, Jeroen Op 't Eynde wrote:
> On 12/13/2009 10:02 AM, Nathan Wayde wrote:
> > On 13/12/09 08:48, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> >> On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 03:31 -0500, Qadri wrote:
> >>>
> >>> So should it be a function of the program to make sure that happens?
> >>> Or is a
> >>
On 13/12/09 12:02, Xavier wrote:
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Sun, 13 Dec 2009 09:02:16 +
schrieb Nathan Wayde:
Of-course this also raises the question of 'what happens when the
master goes down?'.
Or gets hacked?
The changes you talked about don't really m
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Sun, 13 Dec 2009 09:02:16 +
> schrieb Nathan Wayde :
>
>> Of-course this also raises the question of 'what happens when the
>> master goes down?'.
>
> Or gets hacked?
>
The changes you talked about don't really make that problem any wo
Am Sun, 13 Dec 2009 09:02:16 +
schrieb Nathan Wayde :
> Of-course this also raises the question of 'what happens when the
> master goes down?'.
Or gets hacked?
Greetings,
Heiko
On 12/13/2009 12:08 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
Jeroen Op 't Eynde wrote:
On 12/13/2009 10:02 AM, Nathan Wayde wrote:
On 13/12/09 08:48, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 03:31 -0500, Qadri wrote:
So should it be a function of the program to make sure that happens?
Or is a
responsibility of
Jeroen Op 't Eynde wrote:
On 12/13/2009 10:02 AM, Nathan Wayde wrote:
On 13/12/09 08:48, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 03:31 -0500, Qadri wrote:
So should it be a function of the program to make sure that happens?
Or is a
responsibility of the user? Should the functionality be progra
On 12/13/2009 10:02 AM, Nathan Wayde wrote:
On 13/12/09 08:48, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 03:31 -0500, Qadri wrote:
So should it be a function of the program to make sure that happens?
Or is a
responsibility of the user? Should the functionality be programmed into
pacman to make su
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:03:53 +0100
Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Am Montag 07 Dezember 2009 schrieb Tom:
> > So, any news on this?
> > I 'fixed' it by removing radeon from initramfs, but as has been
> > pointed out, thats not really a solution!?
> >
> HI guys,
> This kms firmware issue revealed a b
On 13/12/09 08:48, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 03:31 -0500, Qadri wrote:
So should it be a function of the program to make sure that happens? Or is a
responsibility of the user? Should the functionality be programmed into
pacman to make sure that happens, or should we be asking that
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 03:31 -0500, Qadri wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 2:07 AM, Brendan Long wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 11:16 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 17:08 -0700, Brendan Long wrote:
> > > > 2009/12/11 Ng Oon-Ee
> > > >
> > > > > On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 02:13
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 2:07 AM, Brendan Long wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 11:16 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 17:08 -0700, Brendan Long wrote:
> > > 2009/12/11 Ng Oon-Ee
> > >
> > > > On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 02:13 +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
> > > > > Am Sat, 12 Dec 2009 08:58
14 matches
Mail list logo
