David C. Rankin wrote:
> Guys,
>
> With KMail Version 1.12.3 Using KDE 4.3.3 (KDE 4.3.3), kmail isn't
> catching any spelling error. Eggsample:
>
works here... do you have the aspell dictionary for your language installed?
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 16:19 -0700, Brendan Long wrote:
>
> I'm actually using Arch primarily because it's so little work to make
> your own packages (I realized that no distro is going to have every
> package I want, although Arch has most of them). In most cases building
> the next version of a
It's either not loading the module (since extra/php5_module.conf
depends on it), OR you're missing the AddType lines like these:
AddType application/x-httpd-php .php
AddType application/x-httpd-php-source .phps
But most likely php5_module.conf should be handling the addtypes.
On Mon, Nov 23, 20
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 9:28 PM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
>
> With KMail Version 1.12.3 Using KDE 4.3.3 (KDE 4.3.3), kmail isn't catching
> any spelling error.
> .
> If you can confirm, I'll bug it.
Just tried here, and it didn't work. Should I have configured
something before trying?
Also
Guys,
With KMail Version 1.12.3 Using KDE 4.3.3 (KDE 4.3.3), kmail isn't catching
any spelling error. Eggsample:
lsdfjhosijg
Spellcheck with kmaaail: "Spell check complete."
WTF??
If you can confirm, I'll bug it.
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
Rankin Law Firm, PLLC
510 Ochiltree Street
N
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 16:17 +0100, hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:49:19 +0100
> Heiko Baums wrote:
>
> > Am Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:17:13 -0200
> > schrieb André Ramaciotti da Silva :
> >
> > > I don't want to flame, but that's why I recently moved to Gentoo.
> > > Arch is one of t
On Monday 23 November 2009 16:12:49 and regarding:
> > What's the trick?
> >
> > (yes, I've stopped and restarted httpd...)
>
> The only thing I can think of is that you've placed the Include line
> before the other LoadModule directives. If you look at
> /etc/httpd/conf/extra/php5_module.conf, it
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:59 PM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I can't believe this. On my new arch install on my laptop, I'm finally getting
> around to configuring the web server and I am having trouble with php. When I
> try and access a php page, all I get is the text of the script echoe
Guys,
I can't believe this. On my new arch install on my laptop, I'm finally getting
around to configuring the web server and I am having trouble with php. When I
try and access a php page, all I get is the text of the script echoed to the
browser. I have heard about this happening before and I
2009/11/24 Carlos Williams :
> The Wiki has a write up (which I have never been able to get working)
> on RAID / LVM but this appears to be configured during the
> installation of Arch which I have already done.
There's also a wiki page to do exactly what you're seeking to do :)
http://wiki.archli
I have a stand alone server running Arch 2009.08 x64 and it was
configured via the 'Netinst' CD however during the time of the
installation, the server had only one physical disk. I installed the
system as follows:
* /dev/sda1 = swap
* /dev/sda2 = boot
* /dev/sda3 = /
* /dev/sda4 = /var
Now I hav
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 04:06:34PM +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:16:46 -0200
> schrieb André Ramaciotti da Silva :
>
> > I know, I know, they always come back. :P
> > My Arch installation is still in my HD, just in case.
> >
> > About disk usage, don't forget that arch keeps
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:49:19 +0100
Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:17:13 -0200
> schrieb André Ramaciotti da Silva :
>
> > I don't want to flame, but that's why I recently moved to Gentoo.
> > Arch is one of the best distros I've used, but when you use a
> > (primarily) binary distro
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:06, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:16:46 -0200
>> And finally, yes, there are optdeps, but pacman don't handle them as
>> nicely it handles obligatory dependencies. If I install an optdep as
>> an explicit installed package, when I uninstall the other packag
Am Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:16:46 -0200
schrieb André Ramaciotti da Silva :
> I know, I know, they always come back. :P
> My Arch installation is still in my HD, just in case.
>
> About disk usage, don't forget that arch keeps a cache of downloaded
> packages. So I don't think Gentoo is in disadvantag
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:17, Keith wrote:
> Peace to you, Daenyth.
>
Glad to help :)
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009, at 22:16:58 -0500, Daenyth Blank wrote: > This
article may help:
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Linux_for_the_blind
and my well have saved sound's sanity, if not tried life. I knew such a play
existed but finding it was beyond my abilities. Thank you SO much, Dae
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 02:49:19PM +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:17:13 -0200
> schrieb André Ramaciotti da Silva :
>
> > I don't want to flame, but that's why I recently moved to Gentoo.
> > Arch is one of the best distros I've used, but when you use a
> > (primarily) binary d
Le Mon, 23 Nov 2009 04:46:44 -0800,
Giovanni Scafora a écrit :
> mplayer != everything
Agreed, and mplayer is meant to be compiled on the machine on which it
is used. No set of dependencies will ever make all the users happy. You
should use one of the packages on the AUR for that, with Yaourt if
Am Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:17:13 -0200
schrieb André Ramaciotti da Silva :
> I don't want to flame, but that's why I recently moved to Gentoo.
> Arch is one of the best distros I've used, but when you use a
> (primarily) binary distro, the number of choices you have is reduced.
>
> I don't blame the
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 2:17 PM, André Ramaciotti da Silva
wrote:
> I don't want to flame, but that's why I recently moved to Gentoo. Arch is
> one of the best distros I've used, but when you use a (primarily) binary
> distro, the number of choices you have is reduced.
>
> I don't blame the devs,
Am Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:31:37 +0200
schrieb Ionut Biru :
> like i said previous better to have that feature. Removing that
> feature just because _you_ don't use and _you_ want to have minimal
> packages is not the way.
I agree with you. It was just a question. As it's not possible to put
smbclien
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 02:31:37PM +0200, Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 11/23/2009 02:24 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> > Am Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:54:49 +0100
> > schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
> >
> >> Some depends are made for convenience, you can build the packages
> >> with ABS without those depends, if they don'
2009/11/23, Heiko Baums :
> But if I wanted to compile everything manually I would have stayed with
> Gentoo. ;-)
mplayer != everything
--
Arch Linux Developer
http://www.archlinux.org
http://www.archlinux.it
On 11/23/2009 02:24 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:54:49 +0100
schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
Some depends are made for convenience, you can build the packages
with ABS without those depends, if they don't stop the program from
starting remove them and add then to ignore array in pac
Am Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:54:49 +0100
schrieb Tobias Powalowski :
> Some depends are made for convenience, you can build the packages
> with ABS without those depends, if they don't stop the program from
> starting remove them and add then to ignore array in pacman.conf.
But if I wanted to compile e
Am Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:53:12 -0800
schrieb Giovanni Scafora :
> Why do you don't fill a bug report for those packages?
Because I didn't know if this is a bug and if smbclient can indeed be
moved to optdepends which isn't possible as Ionut has written.
Heiko
Am Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:03:55 +0200
schrieb Ionut Biru :
> can't be an optdepends.
>
> pacman -Rd smbclient
>
> mplayer
> mplayer: error while loading shared libraries: libsmbclient.so.0:
> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
>
> smbclient is kinda important for those packa
On 11/23/2009 01:49 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:30:50 +0800
schrieb Gergely Imreh:
Anyway, this is just an observation, Arch seems to do quite well in
general (thanks Maintainers:). I'll look around the repos again and
might come up for some more repackaging ideas for the next
Regarding client side rate limiting, I have tried trickle once. Does anyone
know any better rate limiters client side ? Something like dummynet in
FreeBSD. iptables is there but anything simpler would do.
-
Raghavendra
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 3:47 PM, RedShift wrote:
> Phillip Sm
Am Montag 23 November 2009 schrieb Giovanni Scafora:
> 2009/11/23, Heiko Baums :
> > I'm running a Linux only system, so I don't need samba. Wouldn't it be
> > possible to move smbclient from depends to optdepends in the affected
> > packages?
>
> Why do you don't fill a bug report for those pa
2009/11/23, Heiko Baums :
> I'm running a Linux only system, so I don't need samba. Wouldn't it be
> possible to move smbclient from depends to optdepends in the affected
> packages?
Why do you don't fill a bug report for those packages?
--
Arch Linux Developer
http://www.archlinux.org
http:
Am Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:30:50 +0800
schrieb Gergely Imreh :
> Anyway, this is just an observation, Arch seems to do quite well in
> general (thanks Maintainers:). I'll look around the repos again and
> might come up for some more repackaging ideas for the next bug
> squashing day or something...
I
Phillip Smith wrote:
*anon_max_rate*
The maximum data transfer rate permitted, in bytes per second, for
anonymous clients.
Good luck!
Ah, I didn't think about doing it in the daemon... That would
definitely be easiest, I think I'll do it this way! :)
You don't need tc to do traffic s
34 matches
Mail list logo
