So recently Verizon has stopped letting me do free tethering and I've
been looking for a replacement. Apparently all of the free ISPs I can
find all require that you use their shitty Windows program to connect,
so I decided, "I have a phone line, a modem and an internet connection,
maybe I can make
Hi,
I'm quote fond of pbzip2's ability to multitask the compression, which comes
really handy when backuping large archives of server files.
But just heard from my friend: pbzip2 has stability issues, sometimes leads to
corruption of archive, and hence unable to recover them. I wonder if this i
Is there any chance of the -bin (precompiled) versions being hosted once an
official release is made? I guess there's little reason for it as they're
so easy to "compile" yourself, but it would simplify upgrading/maintenance
for a number of users.
I don't see google moving away from their custom b
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 17:51 -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> 2009/11/18 Ng Oon-Ee :
> > On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 14:38 -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Geoff wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:59:33 -0600
> >> > Aaron Griffin wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Seems to work now :)
2009/11/18 Ng Oon-Ee :
> On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 14:38 -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Geoff wrote:
>> > On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:59:33 -0600
>> > Aaron Griffin wrote:
>> >
>> >> Seems to work now :)
>> >
>> > Actually the last thread I posted to was one where you gave
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 14:38 -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Geoff wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:59:33 -0600
> > Aaron Griffin wrote:
> >
> >> Seems to work now :)
> >
> > Actually the last thread I posted to was one where you gave
> > me a ticking-off for prolon
hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:42:40 -0200
"Guilherme M. Nogueira" wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Ionut Biru
wrote:
now is not the time. chromium doesn't have a stable release yet and
the build process kinda suck. 10gb space for compiling chromium is
someth
At Mittwoch, 18. November 2009 14:07 Xavier wrote:
I hope this could be a help for someone who knows how to configurate pam.-)
> And I am curious to know what the pam settings of other distro are
> (debian,fedora,gentoo,..).
Opensuse with the KDE43 repo has no /etc/pam.d/kde file and they used f
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Geoff wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:59:33 -0600
> Aaron Griffin wrote:
>
>> Seems to work now :)
>
> Actually the last thread I posted to was one where you gave
> me a ticking-off for prolonging it past your expression of
> displeasure at its continuance. I wond
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:59:33 -0600
Aaron Griffin wrote:
> Seems to work now :)
Actually the last thread I posted to was one where you gave
me a ticking-off for prolonging it past your expression of
displeasure at its continuance. I wondered if maybe I had
been banned. Maybe I was. Maybe I shou
> As far as the people I know, passwd -d and passwd -l are the most
> common ways to do this. They do NOT change the shell. Changing the
> shell to lock out an account is laughable
expiredate would be more appropriate but again it didn't seem to be
instant. locking the password is good but it 'rep
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Geoff wrote:
> Sorry to post a test message, but I am an infrequent poster
> whose e-mails have not been getting through. I wrote to
> the list admins about it a while ago but got no response, so
> I have unsubscribed / resubscribed.
Seems to work now :)
Sorry to post a test message, but I am an infrequent poster
whose e-mails have not been getting through. I wrote to
the list admins about it a while ago but got no response, so
I have unsubscribed / resubscribed.
vlad (2009-11-18 18:47):
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 09:56:59AM -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Arvid Picciani wrote:
> > > Daenyth Blank wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I just saw a link on reddit this morning for "notmuch", a sup-inspired
> > >> mail reader. Might be worth lo
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 09:56:59AM -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Arvid Picciani wrote:
> > Daenyth Blank wrote:
> >>
> >> I just saw a link on reddit this morning for "notmuch", a sup-inspired
> >> mail reader. Might be worth looking into
> >>
> >> http://keithp.co
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Arvid Picciani wrote:
> Daenyth Blank wrote:
>>
>> I just saw a link on reddit this morning for "notmuch", a sup-inspired
>> mail reader. Might be worth looking into
>>
>> http://keithp.com/blogs/notmuch/
>
> well its really "not much". i wouldnt consider this a m
Caleb Cushing wrote:
so here's the problem I've discovered
http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com/2009/11/bypassing-disabled-accounts-with-kdm.html
< links to arch bug included posting here because I believe both kde's
and arch's developers responses are less than satisfactory. This is a
security bug
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:42:40 -0200
"Guilherme M. Nogueira" wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Ionut Biru
> wrote:
>
> > now is not the time. chromium doesn't have a stable release yet and
> > the build process kinda suck. 10gb space for compiling chromium is
> > something that cannot be
Daenyth Blank wrote:
I just saw a link on reddit this morning for "notmuch", a sup-inspired
mail reader. Might be worth looking into
http://keithp.com/blogs/notmuch/
well its really "not much". i wouldnt consider this a mua. its more a
search engine for muas. a pretty decent one though. mayb
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 09:36, jelle van der waa wrote:
> Re: We need a maintained-by-TU chrome/chromium... (Juan Diego)
>
> There are enough arch user maintained repo's, you could ask them to package
> it beside that how much work is AUR ;)
Can you please reply to the specific thread instead of
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> now is not the time. chromium doesn't have a stable release yet and the
> build process kinda suck. 10gb space for compiling chromium is something
> that cannot be forgot :)
>
> --
> Ionut
>
WOW! Really?!
I had no idea compiling chromium need
Re: We need a maintained-by-TU chrome/chromium... (Juan Diego)
There are enough arch user maintained repo's, you could ask them to package
it beside that how much work is AUR ;)
2009/11/18
> Send arch-general mailing list submissions to
>arch-general@archlinux.org
>
> To subscribe or un
On 11/18/2009 03:48 PM, Hamo wrote:
Dear Archlinux users,
Chrome is likely to be a daily-use web browser and with the Chrome OS
releasing,it will become more and more reliable.Archlinux is a
rolling-release distribution and it aims at being bleeding edge.So we
should have a maintained-by-TU chrom
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:56 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Caleb Cushing wrote:
>>
>> so here's the problem I've discovered
>>
>> http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com/2009/11/bypassing-disabled-accounts-with-kdm.html
>> < links to arch bug included posting here because I believe both kde's
>> and arch's
Hello
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 09:48:26PM +0800, Hamo wrote:
> Dear Archlinux users,
> Chrome is likely to be a daily-use web browser and with the Chrome OS
> releasing,it will become more and more reliable.Archlinux is a
> rolling-release distribution and it aims at being bleeding edge.So we
> sho
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Juan Diego wrote:
> I would be happy to maintain that package, but unfortunately Im not a TU
>
> dont you think archlinux should have something similar to ppa from
> ubuntu so that it will be easier to maintain and promote personal
> repositories, aur is a good op
I would be happy to maintain that package, but unfortunately Im not a TU
dont you think archlinux should have something similar to ppa from
ubuntu so that it will be easier to maintain and promote personal
repositories, aur is a good option but if I would have to choose
between using a packages fr
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 08:48, Hamo wrote:
> Dear Archlinux users,
> Chrome is likely to be a daily-use web browser and with the Chrome OS
> releasing,it will become more and more reliable.Archlinux is a
> rolling-release distribution and it aims at being bleeding edge.So we
> should have a mainta
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 14:17 +0100, bender02 wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Xavier wrote:
>> > And I am curious to know what the pam settings of other distro are
>> > (debian,fedora,gentoo,..).
>> >
>> > Finally, maybe it makes sen
Dear Archlinux users,
Chrome is likely to be a daily-use web browser and with the Chrome OS
releasing,it will become more and more reliable.Archlinux is a
rolling-release distribution and it aims at being bleeding edge.So we
should have a maintained-by-TU chrome/chromium and it is really
useful...
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 14:17 +0100, bender02 wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Xavier wrote:
> > And I am curious to know what the pam settings of other distro are
> > (debian,fedora,gentoo,..).
> >
> > Finally, maybe it makes sense to try keeping all the different pam
> > login files as co
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Xavier wrote:
> And I am curious to know what the pam settings of other distro are
> (debian,fedora,gentoo,..).
>
> Finally, maybe it makes sense to try keeping all the different pam
> login files as consistent as possible. But I don't know enough about
> pam to te
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Caleb Cushing wrote:
> so here's the problem I've discovered
> http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com/2009/11/bypassing-disabled-accounts-with-kdm.html
> < links to arch bug included posting here because I believe both kde's
> and arch's developers responses are less th
2009/11/18 Ng Oon-Ee :
> The *disadvantage* is that the devs/maintainers have to patch up-stream.
> This should be kept to a minimum, primarily to reduce their workload,
> and also because it is ASSUMED that if you use Arch, you're capable of
> doing the Right Thing (tm) according to your situation
http://notmuchmail.org/
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 03:49 -0500, Caleb Cushing wrote:
> >
> > Minimal modification of packages. Allow users to choose for themselves
> > instead of doing work for them. I fail to see the security implications
> > here for the common user, why would someone want to lock out a user
> > without dele
Le Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:23:25 -0600,
Aaron Griffin a écrit :
> Aha, so this is the same as the "threaded vs nested comments" when it
> comes to web page commenting. As far as I know, that's a holy war no
> one will ever win.
Strange that you like Gmail-style but the comments on your own blog are
Le Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:56:24 -0600,
"David C. Rankin" a écrit :
> On Tuesday 17 November 2009 05:50:02 and regarding:
> > Am Dienstag 17 November 2009 12:22:35 schrieb tuxce:
> > > I'm uploading it right now, thanks for the information.
> >
> > You know that redistribution of the binary package
>
> Minimal modification of packages. Allow users to choose for themselves
> instead of doing work for them. I fail to see the security implications
> here for the common user, why would someone want to lock out a user
> without deleting the account except a system admin, who presumably would
> kno
39 matches
Mail list logo
