Re: [arch-general] enlightenment e-svn (e17) segfaults with standard setup, OK with minimalist (battery module)

2009-10-21 Thread David C. Rankin
Interesting side note. It looks like a developer is working on a combination of e17 and compiz. It's called 'ecomorph' if anyone is interested. The info for the site is: http://code.google.com/p/itask-module/wiki/Stuff -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Na

Re: [arch-general] Why does kde4 over vnc look bad if host is Arch, looks fine if suse?

2009-10-21 Thread David C. Rankin
On Wednesday 21 October 2009 11:14:02 pm David C. Rankin wrote: > On Wednesday 21 October 2009 09:56:29 pm Byron Clark wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 09:50:53PM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote: > > > You are 100% correct, suse had RENDER enable, arch doesn't. How do I > > > enable RENDER on Arch?

Re: [arch-general] Why does kde4 over vnc look bad if host is Arch, looks fine if suse?

2009-10-21 Thread David C. Rankin
On Wednesday 21 October 2009 09:56:29 pm Byron Clark wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 09:50:53PM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote: > > You are 100% correct, suse had RENDER enable, arch doesn't. How do I > > enable RENDER on Arch? > > You'll need a vnc server that supports the RENDER extension. > xf4v

Re: [arch-general] Why does kde4 over vnc look bad if host is Arch, looks fine if suse?

2009-10-21 Thread Byron Clark
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 09:50:53PM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote: > You are 100% correct, suse had RENDER enable, arch doesn't. How do I enable > RENDER on Arch? You'll need a vnc server that supports the RENDER extension. xf4vnc-xvnc should work. -- Byron Clark

Re: [arch-general] Why does kde4 over vnc look bad if host is Arch, looks fine if suse?

2009-10-21 Thread David C. Rankin
On Wednesday 21 October 2009 08:54:04 pm Byron Clark wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 08:38:58PM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote: > > This has puzzled me for a while now. If I need to do something on a > > remote host that is something more than what I want to do over ssh > > (something that require

Re: [arch-general] udev and high load.......

2009-10-21 Thread David C. Rankin
On Wednesday 21 October 2009 01:02:15 pm Dario wrote: > The udev daemon was possessed:D > rotflmao :p -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com

Re: [arch-general] enlightenment e-svn (e17) segfaults with standard setup, OK with minimalist (battery module)

2009-10-21 Thread David C. Rankin
On Wednesday 21 October 2009 09:55:22 am David Rosenstrauch wrote: > On 10/21/2009 03:34 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > > On the plus side, e17 is one helluva a good looking desktop (especially > > with the dark a-sblack-esp1 theme -- Wow!) Screenshot showing e17 running > > via vncviewer from my Arc

Re: [arch-general] Why does kde4 over vnc look bad if host is Arch, looks fine if suse?

2009-10-21 Thread Byron Clark
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 08:38:58PM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote: > This has puzzled me for a while now. If I need to do something on a remote > host that is something more than what I want to do over ssh (something that > requires 4-5 windows or apps or configuring the actual remote desktop) I

[arch-general] Why does kde4 over vnc look bad if host is Arch, looks fine if suse?

2009-10-21 Thread David C. Rankin
Guys, This has puzzled me for a while now. If I need to do something on a remote host that is something more than what I want to do over ssh (something that requires 4-5 windows or apps or configuring the actual remote desktop) I use vncserver/vncviewer. If I need a kde4 app and the remote ho

Re: [arch-general] defunct packages spooking around

2009-10-21 Thread Xavier
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Firmicus wrote: > That's what I guessed: termcap-compat has ~18%! > csup: 15% > and libdownload: 59%!! > > For the rest one would need to check each pkg under "unknown" for > non-existence in AUR... Any volunteer? :) > > I think you can automate that. One exampl

Re: [arch-general] defunct packages spooking around

2009-10-21 Thread Firmicus
Eric Bélanger a écrit : > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Firmicus wrote: > >> Eric Bélanger a écrit : >> >>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 5:39 AM, Firmicus wrote: >>> >>> Allan McRae a écrit : > Firmicus wrote: > > >> Hi folks, >

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Load_Cycle_Count and storage-fixup

2009-10-21 Thread Roman Kyrylych
2009/10/19 Ng Oon-Ee : > On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 02:54 +0200, Damjan Georgievski wrote: >> >> Anyone else has some opinion about how to handle this? >> > >> > I'd like to affirm the opinions of Roman and Xavier and take some action on >> > this. Thanks for picking up this topic! >> > Anyone object

Re: [arch-general] defunct packages spooking around

2009-10-21 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Firmicus wrote: > Eric Bélanger a écrit : >> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 5:39 AM, Firmicus wrote: >> >>> Allan McRae a écrit : >>> Firmicus wrote: > Hi folks, > > Sorry for the halloweenish subject heading ;) > > I recently got this bug

Re: [arch-general] udev and high load.......

2009-10-21 Thread Dario
In data mercoledì 21 ottobre 2009 15:08:43, David Houston ha scritto: > Rebooted today and the problem is gone?!?! The udev daemon was possessed:D ciao! Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com

Re: [arch-general] defunct packages spooking around

2009-10-21 Thread Firmicus
Eric Bélanger a écrit : > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 5:39 AM, Firmicus wrote: > >> Allan McRae a écrit : >> >>> Firmicus wrote: >>> Hi folks, Sorry for the halloweenish subject heading ;) I recently got this bug report: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16690

Re: [arch-general] enlightenment e-svn (e17) segfaults with standard setup, OK with minimalist (battery module)

2009-10-21 Thread David Rosenstrauch
On 10/21/2009 03:34 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: On the plus side, e17 is one helluva a good looking desktop (especially with the dark a-sblack-esp1 theme -- Wow!) Screenshot showing e17 running via vncviewer from my Arch server (it is light weight enough to be a great remote dt): http://www.31

Re: [arch-general] udev and high load.......

2009-10-21 Thread David Houston
Rebooted today and the problem is gone?!?! Dave - r...@crankyadmin.net cra...@archlinux.us On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 9:56 AM, David Houston wrote: > Hi all, > > Over the last day or so, udev has been sending my system load though the > roof?!? Nothing has changed on the system. I ha

Re: [arch-general] defunct packages spooking around

2009-10-21 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 5:39 AM, Firmicus wrote: > Allan McRae a écrit : >> Firmicus wrote: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> Sorry for the halloweenish subject heading ;) >>> >>> I recently got this bug report: >>> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16690 >>> >>> It turned out it was not a bug with the perl pack

Re: [arch-general] mplayer needs a rebuild

2009-10-21 Thread Otávio Módolo
works fine here but i agree that a mplayer optimized for nvidia cards (VDPAU) and ffmpeg-mt is missing on the repos... 2009/10/21 Caleb Cushing > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 12:51 AM, member zhurai > wrote: > > I tried rebuilding mplayer, but I'm getting errors O_o > > > > and when I looked in #mpl

Re: [arch-general] defunct packages spooking around

2009-10-21 Thread Firmicus
Allan McRae a écrit : > Firmicus wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> Sorry for the halloweenish subject heading ;) >> >> I recently got this bug report: >> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16690 >> >> It turned out it was not a bug with the perl package at all, but a >> problem which occurs when the presumably

Re: [arch-general] defunct packages spooking around

2009-10-21 Thread Allan McRae
Firmicus wrote: Hi folks, Sorry for the halloweenish subject heading ;) I recently got this bug report: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16690 It turned out it was not a bug with the perl package at all, but a problem which occurs when the presumably very old and no longer existing package "term

[arch-general] defunct packages spooking around

2009-10-21 Thread Firmicus
Hi folks, Sorry for the halloweenish subject heading ;) I recently got this bug report: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16690 It turned out it was not a bug with the perl package at all, but a problem which occurs when the presumably very old and no longer existing package "termcap-compat" is ins

Re: [arch-general] enlightenment e-svn (e17) segfaults with standard setup, OK with minimalist (battery module)

2009-10-21 Thread David C. Rankin
On Tuesday 20 October 2009 12:05:10 pm David C. Rankin wrote: > > > > Hi David, > > > > I've been experimenting with E17(from the repo) + ecomorph (AUR) for > > the last couple of days, I've never had E17 segfault. So, I doubt > > its e17 itself, sure e17 is still in development phase, but afaik