Re: [arch-general] Should samba be considered out-of-date?

On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 07:00 +0200, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Am Montag 12 Oktober 2009 schrieb Ng Oon-Ee: > > Currently samba has just been upped to 3.3.8. However the current > > 'stable' for samba according to their website is 3.4.2. > > > > As I'm sure the maintainer already knows about this,

Re: [arch-general] Should samba be considered out-of-date?

Am Montag 12 Oktober 2009 schrieb Ng Oon-Ee: > Currently samba has just been upped to 3.3.8. However the current > 'stable' for samba according to their website is 3.4.2. > > As I'm sure the maintainer already knows about this, I'm wondering which > of the changes in samba 3.4 (listed > http://www

[arch-general] Should samba be considered out-of-date?

Currently samba has just been upped to 3.3.8. However the current 'stable' for samba according to their website is 3.4.2. As I'm sure the maintainer already knows about this, I'm wondering which of the changes in samba 3.4 (listed http://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-3.4.0.html initially) is h

Re: [arch-general] confirm LTS kernel / usb printer permission issues

Evangelos Foutras wrote: Evangelos Foutras wrote: Andreas Radke wrote: btw: do you have problems using an usb printer and "lp" group permission like I posted to the mailing lists? I could only workaround it. -Andy It happens here too. However, the printer device ends up in the vboxusers gro

Re: [arch-general] confirm LTS kernel / usb printer permission issues

Am Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:49:49 +0200 schrieb Andreas Radke : > I have a permission issue when using the kernel26-lts with my usb > printer. The device doesn't always get "lp" group. Especially when I > switch it off and on again. Then new cups 1.4.x can't find the > printer. With kernel 2.6.30 and 2

Re: [arch-general] dd and bash_completion

On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 4:57 PM, clemens fischer wrote: > On Thu-2009/09/24-22:24 Aaron Griffin wrote: > >> And this appears to be fixed in git >> >> http://code.phraktured.net/cgit.cgi/bash-completion/commit/?id=f733e71e1f8d63c072a402346d8162f9c6b63ae2 >> http://code.phraktured.net/cgit.cgi/bash-

Re: [arch-general] dd and bash_completion

On Thu-2009/09/24-22:24 Aaron Griffin wrote: > And this appears to be fixed in git > > http://code.phraktured.net/cgit.cgi/bash-completion/commit/?id=f733e71e1f8d63c072a402346d8162f9c6b63ae2 > http://code.phraktured.net/cgit.cgi/bash-completion/commit/?id=f871fe4101ed89cb98e201aed8c975fd3061905b

Re: [arch-general] Defunct processes left behind for screen and firefox

Hate to bother you all again, but it seems that not only screen and firefox are hit by the 'defunct' processes left behind... Now also runsv (part of runit) sometimes behaves like this. Am I the only one that experiences defunct processes left behind? Thanks, Ciprian. On Tu

Re: [arch-general] perl 5.10.1-3 broken ?

Ashish SHUKLA a écrit : > In <4acdada2.7030...@gmx.net>, Firmicus wrote: >> Ashish SHUKLA a écrit : >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> I've noticed that the recent perl update (5.10.1-3) has not >>> installed any PODs >>> which are required by 'perldoc' for displaying documentation. Are >>> PODs moved >>> to

Re: [arch-general] nut package - no docs or cgi interface??

David C. Rankin wrote: On Saturday 10 October 2009 02:40:06 am Tom K wrote: David C. Rankin wrote: On Friday 09 October 2009 11:05:09 pm Allan McRae wrote: File a bug report/feature request. Allan Done: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16554 Should be under the

Re: [arch-general] X fails to start with intel card after latest kernel update

Excerpts from David C. Rankin's message of So Okt 11 10:16:57 +0200 2009: > On Sunday 11 October 2009 03:10:15 am David C. Rankin wrote: > I'm back already. The wiki page must be out of date. It says to put the > following in modprobe.conf (which is deprecated): > > options i915 modeset=1 >

Re: [arch-general] X fails to start with intel card after latest kernel update

On Sunday 11 October 2009 03:10:15 am David C. Rankin wrote: > The strange part is that if that is the problem, something changed > with the 10/8 update. For many months, this box with the intel card just > worked... I'll report back after reading through the wiki and either claim > suc

Re: [arch-general] nut package - no docs or cgi interface??

On Saturday 10 October 2009 02:40:06 am Tom K wrote: > David C. Rankin wrote: > > On Friday 09 October 2009 11:05:09 pm Allan McRae wrote: > >> File a bug report/feature request. > >> > >> Allan > > > > Done: > > > > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16554 > > Should be under the Community Packages p

Re: [arch-general] X fails to start with intel card after latest kernel update

On Saturday 10 October 2009 02:09:26 am Flavio Costa wrote: > Is KMS enabled? > Is KM..what enabled? That must have been a change I missed?? I'm reading back through http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Intel_Graphics to try and figure out what it is and why I now need it but haven't s

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] xfsprogs-3.0.3-1

I use xfs on / and /home and my external drive, absolutely no problems so far. Signoff for i686 * Tobias Powalowski [10.10.2009 20:11]: > Am Samstag 12 September 2009 schrieb Dan McGee: > > On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > > > Am Montag 07 September 2009 schrieb Tobia

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] xfsprogs-3.0.3-1

You may want to post that you're looking for a signoff in the [testing] repo section of the forums. They seem to have much higher user traffic than the mailing lists as far as i can see. 2009/10/11 Tobias Powalowski > Am Sonntag 11 Oktober 2009 schrieb Dario: > > Hi! > > > > In data domenica 11

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] xfsprogs-3.0.3-1

Tobias Powalowski wrote: Am Sonntag 11 Oktober 2009 schrieb Dario: Hi! In data domenica 11 ottobre 2009 02:32:20, Allan McRae ha scritto: Use the xfsprogs package from [testing] and see if everything still works. It should be safe to upgrade only that package from the [testing] repo.