On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Jozsef wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Xavier wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Aaron Griffin
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Jozsef wrote:
> >> >>> I never used runtimepath before
Although I don't know chinese (as I'm an american born chinese) (I do know
Japanese if that's needed.)
I might be able to get some of my cousins to do it if they want in their
free time...should I do so?
- Brandon Fu
2009/9/22 Xavier
> 2009/9/22 vojtech.gondzala :
> > Dne Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:5
2009/9/22 vojtech.gondzala :
> Dne Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:53:32 +0200 Xavier napsal(a):
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> we are just lacking a quick update for two languages (czech and
>> simplified chinese), and it's just 13 messages, so maybe someone here
>> could help ?
>>
>> The po files are there :
>> http://c
On Tuesday 22 September 2009 01:36:32 pm Xavier wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 8:17 PM, David C. Rankin
>
> wrote:
> > Listmates,
> >
> >I have been chasing my tail on the madwifi issue and I think I
> > have found the problem. It's not madwifi at all, it's the timezone
> > handling.
>
On Tuesday 22 September 2009 01:29:03 pm Alessandro Doro wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 01:17:55PM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
> > Listmates,
> >
> > I have been chasing my tail on the madwifi issue and I think I have
> > found the problem. It's not madwifi at all, it's the timezone handlin
Le Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:29:03 +0200,
Alessandro Doro a écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 01:17:55PM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
> > Listmates,
> >
> > I have been chasing my tail on the madwifi issue and I
> > think I have found the problem. It's not madwifi at all, it's the
> > timezone ha
On Tuesday 22 September 2009 09:56:49 am David C. Rankin wrote:
> I know the wmaster0/wlan0 combination was weird, but it seemed to
> work fine. I'll change the config to wifi0/ath0 under the old kernel,
> confirm performance under the setup and then I'll reinstall the new kernel
> and
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Jozsef wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Xavier wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Aaron Griffin
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Jozsef wrote:
>> >>> I never used runtimepath before and everything worked fine.
>> >
>> > You shouldn't have
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Xavier wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Aaron Griffin
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Jozsef wrote:
> >>> I never used runtimepath before and everything worked fine.
> >
> > You shouldn't have to. It is set by default by vim. In a running vim
> > in
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Xavier wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 8:17 PM, David C. Rankin
> wrote:
>> Listmates,
>>
>> I have been chasing my tail on the madwifi issue and I think I have
>> found the
>> problem. It's not madwifi at all, it's the timezone handling.
>>
>
> WTF does
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Jozsef wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >
> > From: Aaron Griffin
> >
> > Sent: 09/22/09 07:10 pm
> >
> > To: General Discusson about Arch Linux
> >
> > Subject: Re: [arch-general] vim 7.2.245-1
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 1
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Jozsef wrote:
>>> I never used runtimepath before and everything worked fine.
>
> You shouldn't have to. It is set by default by vim. In a running vim instance
> do
> :echo &runtimepath
>
To Jozsef :
pleas
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 8:17 PM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> Listmates,
>
> I have been chasing my tail on the madwifi issue and I think I have
> found the
> problem. It's not madwifi at all, it's the timezone handling.
>
WTF does fsck/recovery console at boot have to do with slow wireless?
On Tuesday 22 September 2009 02:54:26 am Gerhard Brauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since 2.6.30.x (i could not exactly say if also with the latest
> 2.6.29.x) stock kernels i have a terrible slow ethernet transfer rate on
> my old Thinkpad T22 (Intel EtherExpress PRO/100 SP, module e100).
>
> Normal transf
> - Original Message -
>
> From: Aaron Griffin
>
> Sent: 09/22/09 07:10 pm
>
> To: General Discusson about Arch Linux
>
> Subject: Re: [arch-general] vim 7.2.245-1
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Jozsef wrote:
> >> I never used runtimepath be
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 01:17:55PM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Listmates,
>
> I have been chasing my tail on the madwifi issue and I think I have
> found the
> problem. It's not madwifi at all, it's the timezone handling.
>
> My box is dual-boot, Arch - Vista. Accordingly, the h
Listmates,
I have been chasing my tail on the madwifi issue and I think I have
found the
problem. It's not madwifi at all, it's the timezone handling.
My box is dual-boot, Arch - Vista. Accordingly, the hardware clock is
set to
localtime:
LOCALE="en_US.utf8"
HARDWARECLOCK="lo
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Jozsef wrote:
>> I never used runtimepath before and everything worked fine.
You shouldn't have to. It is set by default by vim. In a running vim instance do
:echo &runtimepath
>> And I don't have a "after" directory in /usr/share/vim/vimfiles/ at the
>> moment
Hello,
we are just lacking a quick update for two languages (czech and
simplified chinese), and it's just 13 messages, so maybe someone here
could help ?
The po files are there :
http://code.toofishes.net/pacman/po_files/pacman/
http://code.toofishes.net/pacman/po_files/libalpm/
On Tuesday 22 September 2009 08:49:51 am Daenyth Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 09:43, David C. Rankin
>
> wrote:
> > Vincent,
> >
> >Thank you for the information. At least I know I'm not going
> > crazy... It looks like I will have to downgrade the kernel to test the
> > older m
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 09:43, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> Vincent,
>
> Thank you for the information. At least I know I'm not going crazy...
> It
> looks like I will have to downgrade the kernel to test the older madwifi
> package:
Could you try to recompile the older madwifi from svn using
On Tuesday 22 September 2009 02:56:18 am Vincent Van Houtte wrote:
> >The network came right up on the next boot, but all isn't good.
> > The network
> > performance is about 1/20th of what it normally is.
>
> I had the same experience with the ath9k-driver since kernel 2.6.29
> (ath9k-dri
2009/9/22 David C. Rankin
>The network came right up on the next boot, but all isn't good. The
> network
> performance is about 1/20th of what it normally is.
I had the same experience with the ath9k-driver since kernel 2.6.29
(ath9k-driver in kernel .28 worked perfectly and in .29 ndis
Hi,
since 2.6.30.x (i could not exactly say if also with the latest
2.6.29.x) stock kernels i have a terrible slow ethernet transfer rate on
my old Thinkpad T22 (Intel EtherExpress PRO/100 SP, module e100).
Normal transfer rate ex. to a mirror is for me ~700Kb/s but i got only
~80-90 Kb/s. And a
26 matches
Mail list logo
