Re: [arch-general] subversion package newer than testing ??

2009-08-29 Thread David C. Rankin
On Saturday 29 August 2009 10:13:14 pm Allan McRae wrote: > David C. Rankin wrote: > > Listmates, > > > > > > What's up? > > Subversion is in testing for the ruby-1.9 rebuild which has been held up > for a long time due to the vim/gvim. The subversion maintainer forgets > to update both at on

Re: [arch-general] Howto adjust font scaling in Arch? All fonts look a bit big and fat?

2009-08-29 Thread David C. Rankin
On Saturday 29 August 2009 01:14:06 am David C. Rankin wrote: > On Thursday 27 August 2009 03:00:14 am RedShift wrote: > > This thread is useless without pics... > > > > > > Glenn > > Agreed. > > Here is a link to my suse desktop showing the kmail message list where > the > font scaling is t

Re: [arch-general] mpc upgrade?

2009-08-29 Thread Ray Kohler
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > Ray Kohler wrote: >> >> I hate to beg for favors from people who are already doing plenty for >> me for free, but could some kind dev update the mpc package? It's now >> two major versions (or what passes for "major" at musicpd) out of >> date,

Re: [arch-general] subversion package newer than testing ??

2009-08-29 Thread Allan McRae
David C. Rankin wrote: Listmates, For the past several days I have gotten the warning on pacman -Syu that: :: Synchronizing package databases... testing is up to date kdemod-legacy is up to date core is up to date extra is up to date community is up to date archlinuxfr is up to da

[arch-general] subversion package newer than testing ??

2009-08-29 Thread David C. Rankin
Listmates, For the past several days I have gotten the warning on pacman -Syu that: :: Synchronizing package databases... testing is up to date kdemod-legacy is up to date core is up to date extra is up to date community is up to date archlinuxfr is up to date :: Starting full syste

Re: [arch-general] mpc upgrade?

2009-08-29 Thread Allan McRae
Ray Kohler wrote: I hate to beg for favors from people who are already doing plenty for me for free, but could some kind dev update the mpc package? It's now two major versions (or what passes for "major" at musicpd) out of date, and only a simple pkgver / md5sum change. I'd ask its maintainer (p

[arch-general] mpc upgrade?

2009-08-29 Thread Ray Kohler
I hate to beg for favors from people who are already doing plenty for me for free, but could some kind dev update the mpc package? It's now two major versions (or what passes for "major" at musicpd) out of date, and only a simple pkgver / md5sum change. I'd ask its maintainer (pizzapunk) directly,

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Integrity Check i686 of core, extra 28-08-2009

2009-08-29 Thread Xavier
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Henning Garus wrote: > > Something like this? Generated from a recently synced ABS tree and latest DBs > from > ftp.archlinux.org . > > > Results for core > ===

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Integrity Check i686 of core, extra 28-08-2009

2009-08-29 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Henning Garus wrote: > On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 01:57:19PM +0200, Xavier wrote: >> >> Maybe there should be a separate simple tool comparing pkgbuild tree >> vs pacman databases (vs packages on ftp/rsync) to make sure everything >> is in sync. >> But I will need some

Re: [arch-general] A little weirdness at boot time

2009-08-29 Thread Adriano de Moura
I've got that network interface "random" swap for quite some time now. I wonder if there is something to do with the 2.6.31 kernel or the new udev Althoug it's rare, at first time I took a lot of time to find the cause... On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 17:13:48 -0300, Daenyth Blank wrote: On Sat,

Re: [arch-general] A little weirdness at boot time

2009-08-29 Thread Daenyth Blank
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 15:16, André Ramaciotti wrote: > That's what I thought too. Anyway, it didn't work, but I found out what the > real problem was. For some reason, sometimes I got: > Wireless -> eth0 > Ethernet -> eth1 > > and other times I got: > Ethernet -> eth0 > Wireless -> eth1 > > so ne

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Integrity Check i686 of core, extra 28-08-2009

2009-08-29 Thread Henning Garus
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 01:57:19PM +0200, Xavier wrote: > > Maybe there should be a separate simple tool comparing pkgbuild tree > vs pacman databases (vs packages on ftp/rsync) to make sure everything > is in sync. > But I will need some more details about what the information we > currently have

Re: [arch-general] A little weirdness at boot time

2009-08-29 Thread André Ramaciotti
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Daenyth Blank > wrote: > On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 13:51, Juan Diego wrote: > > about the network card problem, have you tried adding: > > > > QUIRKS="predown" > > > > to your netcfg config file > I thought that quirks were removed? > That's what I thought too. Any

Re: [arch-general] A little weirdness at boot time

2009-08-29 Thread Daenyth Blank
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 13:51, Juan Diego wrote: > about the network card problem, have you tried adding: > > QUIRKS="predown" > > to your netcfg config file I thought that quirks were removed?

Re: [arch-general] A little weirdness at boot time

2009-08-29 Thread Andre Ramaciotti da Silva
At Sun, 30 Aug 2009 02:51:46 +0900, Juan Diego wrote: > > about the network card problem, have you tried adding: > > QUIRKS="predown" > > to your netcfg config file I'll test it, thanks.

Re: [arch-general] A little weirdness at boot time

2009-08-29 Thread Juan Diego
about the network card problem, have you tried adding: QUIRKS="predown" to your netcfg config file On 8/29/09, Andre Ramaciotti da Silva wrote: > Hi all! > > This email is divided in two parts: a curiosity and a problem. They are > somewhat > related, so I'm writing both together. > > The curio

Re: [arch-general] Problem with udev 145?

2009-08-29 Thread Thomas Bächler
Sebastian Schwarz schrieb: On 2009-08-29 at 14:26 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: So we narrowed the problem down. Does cryptsetup luksDump show the UUID for both of them. And cryptsetup luksUUID? I'll have to look into blkid and see why it fails. Yes, both luksDump and luksUUID show the UUIDs fo

[arch-general] lm_sensors

2009-08-29 Thread ponto
i've used sensors-detect and it gave me: Now follows a summary of the probes I have just done. Just press ENTER to continue: Driver `coretemp': * Chip `Intel Core family thermal sensor' (confidence: 9) Do you want to overwrite /etc/conf.d/lm_sensors? (YES/no): Copy prog/init/lm_sensors.init to

Re: [arch-general] Problem with udev 145?

2009-08-29 Thread Sebastian Schwarz
On 2009-08-29 at 14:26 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: > So we narrowed the problem down. Does cryptsetup luksDump show the > UUID for both of them. And cryptsetup luksUUID? I'll have to look > into blkid and see why it fails. Yes, both luksDump and luksUUID show the UUIDs for both drives.

[arch-general] A little weirdness at boot time

2009-08-29 Thread Andre Ramaciotti da Silva
Hi all! This email is divided in two parts: a curiosity and a problem. They are somewhat related, so I'm writing both together. The curiosity: Since I've installed Arch Linux in this notebook (in March), the time it takes to load the modules highly varies. With the current archinit scripts, it ra

Re: [arch-general] Problem with udev 145?

2009-08-29 Thread Thomas Bächler
Sebastian Schwarz schrieb: On 2009-08-29 at 13:52 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: Can't see anything here. Can you call blkid /dev/sdb1 (or whetever the partition is)? The following command for the partition in question did not output anything: $ blkid /dev/sdc1 Yes, I am sure this is the right

Re: [arch-general] Problem with udev 145?

2009-08-29 Thread Sebastian Schwarz
On 2009-08-29 at 13:52 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Can't see anything here. Can you call blkid /dev/sdb1 (or whetever > the partition is)? The following command for the partition in question did not output anything: $ blkid /dev/sdc1 Yes, I am sure this is the right device file. :) $ ls -l /

Re: [arch-general] Problem with udev 145?

2009-08-29 Thread Thomas Bächler
Sebastian Schwarz schrieb: I forgot to mention that I do not use any custom udev rules. Just Arch's defaults. On 2009-08-29 at 01:43 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: It's an external drive for you, so can you run: udevadm --kernel --udev --env and then plug it in? Maybe we can find the problem in