Re: [arch-general] Scribus intallation problem

2009-07-15 Thread richard terry
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 02:25:15 pm you wrote: > richard terry wrote: > > (11/11) installing scribus > > [ > >] 100% > > sh: error while loading shared libraries: libreadline.so.5: cannot open > > shared object file: No suc

Re: [arch-general] Scribus intallation problem

2009-07-15 Thread Allan McRae
richard terry wrote: (11/11) installing scribus [] 100% sh: error while loading shared libraries: libreadline.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory sh: error while

Re: [arch-general] Scribus intallation problem

2009-07-15 Thread Denis A . Altoé Falqueto
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Daniel J Griffiths wrote: > richard terry wrote: >> >> (11/11) installing scribus >>  [] >> 100% >> sh: error while loading shared libraries: libreadline.so.5: cannot open >> shared obje

Re: [arch-general] Scribus intallation problem

2009-07-15 Thread Daniel J Griffiths
richard terry wrote: (11/11) installing scribus [] 100% sh: error while loading shared libraries: libreadline.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory sh: error while

[arch-general] Scribus intallation problem

2009-07-15 Thread richard terry
(11/11) installing scribus [] 100% sh: error while loading shared libraries: libreadline.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory sh: error while loading shared librar

Re: [arch-general] How can packages be "Newer than testing"??

2009-07-15 Thread Allan McRae
David C. Rankin wrote: Listmates, On an i586 box with kde4 from testing, I am now unable to login. kdm starts to login, crashes and restarts. (detailed in a separate post) I was hoping that this would be fixed by an update or two, but upon checking this evening, I received the follow

[arch-general] How can packages be "Newer than testing"??

2009-07-15 Thread David C. Rankin
Listmates, On an i586 box with kde4 from testing, I am now unable to login. kdm starts to login, crashes and restarts. (detailed in a separate post) I was hoping that this would be fixed by an update or two, but upon checking this evening, I received the following: 19:27 supersff:~> p

Re: [arch-general] emacs-cvs do not run after libjpeg updated

2009-07-15 Thread Attila
On Mittwoch, 15. Juli 2009 22:50 Stefan Husmann wrote: > no, that might break a hundred of other packages you might have > installed. The best way would be to wait for the mirror syncing or to > rebuild emacs-cvs using abs. First, i'm not waiting for emacs-cvs.-) My problem is that i don't know w

Re: [arch-general] emacs-cvs do not run after libjpeg updated

2009-07-15 Thread Stefan Husmann
Attila schrieb: On Mittwoch, 15. Juli 2009 19:27 Florian Pritz wrote: Get the old libjpeg package, extract it and copy the .so file to /usr/lib. Linking is a no-go. Thanks very much, this is the best way and i saved the files from libjpeg 6b-6. See you, Attila no, that might break a hundre

Re: [arch-general] emacs-cvs do not run after libjpeg updated

2009-07-15 Thread Attila
On Mittwoch, 15. Juli 2009 19:27 Florian Pritz wrote: > Get the old libjpeg package, extract it and copy the .so file to > /usr/lib. Linking is a no-go. Thanks very much, this is the best way and i saved the files from libjpeg 6b-6. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] emacs-cvs do not run after libjpeg updated

2009-07-15 Thread Florian Pritz
Attila wrote: > On Mittwoch, 15. Juli 2009 14:14 Allan McRae wrote: > >> Don't symlink libraries >> >> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15222#comment46995 -> it should be on its >> way to a mirror near you. > > Okay, it is the best to don't do this but i have a technical question about it > in th

Re: [arch-general] emacs-cvs do not run after libjpeg updated

2009-07-15 Thread Attila
On Mittwoch, 15. Juli 2009 14:14 Allan McRae wrote: > Don't symlink libraries > > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15222#comment46995 -> it should be on its > way to a mirror near you. Okay, it is the best to don't do this but i have a technical question about it in this case: What would be th

Re: [arch-general] Perplexing libjpeg-related packaging issue

2009-07-15 Thread bardo
2009/7/15 Thomas Bächler : > What readelf said is what is written in the binary. If the binary says > libjpeg.so.62, then it's an old binary! You're right. I reverted back to the puzzle.ch mirror and I saw it didn't sync properly, it still has the old mldonkey. Thanks for clarifications =) Corrad

Re: [arch-general] Perplexing libjpeg-related packaging issue

2009-07-15 Thread Thomas Bächler
bardo schrieb: 2009/7/15 bardo : Yes, i686, but just to be sure I checked on both arches, and I get the new version. The problem has been solved by switching repos. Could it be that mldonkey just linked to libjpeg.so, and readelf recurred to libjpeg.so.62, while the program said it didn't find

Re: [arch-general] Perplexing libjpeg-related packaging issue

2009-07-15 Thread bardo
2009/7/15 bardo : > Yes, i686, but just to be sure I checked on both arches, and I get the > new version. The problem has been solved by switching repos. Could it be that mldonkey just linked to libjpeg.so, and readelf recurred to libjpeg.so.62, while the program said it didn't find the library be

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] [user] cups-1.3.11-1

2009-07-15 Thread Roman Kyrylych
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 15:39, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto wrote: > Hi, > > I didn't find the original signoff message, but here is my user > signoff for cups-1.3.11-1 in x86_64. The server starts, web interface > is fine, pdf printer is also ok. There wasn't signoff message because cups is in Extra,

[arch-general] [signoff] [user] cups-1.3.11-1

2009-07-15 Thread Denis A . Altoé Falqueto
Hi, I didn't find the original signoff message, but here is my user signoff for cups-1.3.11-1 in x86_64. The server starts, web interface is fine, pdf printer is also ok. -- --- Denis A. Altoe Falqueto --- Milton Ber

Re: [arch-general] Perplexing libjpeg-related packaging issue

2009-07-15 Thread bardo
2009/7/15 Allan McRae : > Strange - both using the same architecture? Yes, i686, but just to be sure I checked on both arches, and I get the new version.

Re: [arch-general] Perplexing libjpeg-related packaging issue

2009-07-15 Thread Allan McRae
bardo wrote: 2009/7/15 bardo : It worked for me, but it seems it did not for the user, so I'm waiting to know which mirror he uses and readelf's output. He uses archlinux.puzzle.ch... I had problems in the last few days with it too, so I switched to another one, maybe this caused the i

Re: [arch-general] Perplexing libjpeg-related packaging issue

2009-07-15 Thread bardo
2009/7/15 bardo : > It worked for me, but it seems it did not for the user, so I'm waiting > to know which mirror he uses and readelf's output. He uses archlinux.puzzle.ch... I had problems in the last few days with it too, so I switched to another one, maybe this caused the issue. Anyway, here's

Re: [arch-general] emacs-cvs do not run after libjpeg updated

2009-07-15 Thread Sergej Pupykin
Hi, I fixed it yesterday (emacs-cvs-20090714) At Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:57:26 +0800, goodme...@gmail.com wrote: > > As a temp methord, >cd /usr/lib >ln -s libjpeg.so libjpeg.so.62 > resolved the bug > > > Anyother has the same problem?

Re: [arch-general] emacs-cvs do not run after libjpeg updated

2009-07-15 Thread Allan McRae
goodme...@gmail.com wrote: As a temp methord, cd /usr/lib ln -s libjpeg.so libjpeg.so.62 resolved the bug Anyother has the same problem? Don't symlink libraries http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15222#comment46995 -> it should be on its way to a mirror near you. Allan

Re: [arch-general] Perplexing libjpeg-related packaging issue

2009-07-15 Thread bardo
2009/7/15 Allan McRae : > If a full update does not help, you might want to try lddd from devtools to > try and find what is still using libjpeg6. It worked for me, but it seems it did not for the user, so I'm waiting to know which mirror he uses and readelf's output. Corrado

[arch-general] emacs-cvs do not run after libjpeg updated

2009-07-15 Thread goodmenzy
As a temp methord, cd /usr/lib ln -s libjpeg.so libjpeg.so.62 resolved the bug Anyother has the same problem?

Re: [arch-general] Perplexing libjpeg-related packaging issue

2009-07-15 Thread Allan McRae
Thomas Bächler wrote: bardo schrieb: Hi guys. Yesterday I rebuild mldonkey since it depended on libjpeg. On x86_64 there are no problems, and everything works as expected; this is not the case for i686, where there's a strange problem: [r...@plafone ~]# ldd /usr/bin/mldonkey | grep libjpeg

Re: [arch-general] Perplexing libjpeg-related packaging issue

2009-07-15 Thread Thomas Bächler
bardo schrieb: Hi guys. Yesterday I rebuild mldonkey since it depended on libjpeg. On x86_64 there are no problems, and everything works as expected; this is not the case for i686, where there's a strange problem: [r...@plafone ~]# ldd /usr/bin/mldonkey | grep libjpeg libjpeg.so.7 => /us

Re: [arch-general] Perplexing libjpeg-related packaging issue

2009-07-15 Thread bardo
2009/7/15 bardo : > The package was created with makechrootpkg in a clean chroot. How is > it even possible to link with two different versions of the same > library? And where did it get the old version, since it didn't exist > in the chroot? I may start to understand... The command I posted was

[arch-general] Perplexing libjpeg-related packaging issue

2009-07-15 Thread bardo
Hi guys. Yesterday I rebuild mldonkey since it depended on libjpeg. On x86_64 there are no problems, and everything works as expected; this is not the case for i686, where there's a strange problem: [r...@plafone ~]# ldd /usr/bin/mldonkey | grep libjpeg libjpeg.so.7 => /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.