Le Wed, 24 Jun 2009 01:22:03 -0300,
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I just do a quick scan of soft linked with readline and I think that
> these two pkgs that are linked with readline violates GPL:
>
> extra/tftp-hpa
> community/ngspice
>
> Both have the "old" BSD (4-clause) licens
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> You can do pacman -Ud to skip dep checks if you're sure the deps are good.
right this is ultimately what I ended up doing...
--
Caleb Cushing
http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com
Am Mittwoch 24 Juni 2009 schrieb David C. Rankin:
> On Tuesday 23 June 2009 04:20:51 pm David C. Rankin wrote:
>
>
> > Now this is very scary looking. The sdb[5-8] and sdd[5-8] partitions are
> > GONE?? (Bummer..) Obviously, I can no longer boot archlinux??
>
> Listmates,
>
> Is there a
Hi,
I just do a quick scan of soft linked with readline and I think that
these two pkgs that are linked with readline violates GPL:
extra/tftp-hpa
community/ngspice
Both have the "old" BSD (4-clause) license and is linked with readline
that is GPL, so there is an incompatibility [#1]
In the ca
Solved!
Well, after searching for a while and reading HAL Specification
I decided to create a fdi file in /etc/hal/fdi/policy containing:
#Sansa e200 Series
false
And it worked! But I still don't understand why!
In HAL Specs it says:
"This is
On Tuesday 23 June 2009 04:20:51 pm David C. Rankin wrote:
> Now this is very scary looking. The sdb[5-8] and sdd[5-8] partitions
> are GONE?? (Bummer..) Obviously, I can no longer boot archlinux??
>
Listmates,
Is there a way I can boot from the install media and then downgrade
On Tue 23 Jun 2009 16:32 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Listmates,
>
> Couple of thoughts for this day. Latest updates come with the
> following praise and questions:
>
> (1) kde4.3 beta 2 (4.2.92svn984151-1) - Wow, much crisper, behaving
> ...well, like it should. Even with the rad
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Guilherme M.
Nogueira wrote:
> I'm still looking for the awnswer.
It shows it as being assigned to /dev/sdc. What's the output if you
try to mount it manually? Does fdisk -l /dev/sdc show the partitions?
Are you using rockbox? It's a pretty nice open source replac
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:
> Am Sun, 21 Jun 2009 22:54:01 +0200
> schrieb Tobias Powalowski :
>
> > Am Sonntag 21 Juni 2009 schrieb Pierre Schmitz:
> > > On Sunday 21 June 2009 22:38:25 Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> > > > - added SCHED_DEBUG=y
> > >
> > > What does this do
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
> David C. Rankin wrote:
>
>
>
>> I get this new message:
>>
>> [00:08 archangel:/etc] # noc fstab
>> bash: /usr/local/bin/noc: /bin/bash: bad interpreter: Text file busy
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>> Text file busy?? It's a text file, it's not busy, it's e
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Sergey Manucharian wrote:
> A friend of mine has such a player, and he has problems mounting it in
> Windows, but never in Linux :)
>
Well.. I don't use windows, so I can't tell anything about that =P
> Thunar volman easily recognizes it, even if it in MTP mode
On Tue 23 Jun 2009 17:00 -0400, Andrei Thorp wrote:
> Today, I'd like to be all complainy about the AUR search feature. I
> haven't really looked around, but are there plans to improve it? Or is
> the solution just "use google with site://"?
Good to hear someone's thinking about AUR. :D
> It seem
On Tue 23 Jun 2009 17:10 -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
> I have completed to setup my new 64-bit system. This new kernel solved
> some slow down in the open source radeonhd grapihcs driver as it is on
> par with the open source ati driver... large improvement.
>
> I am now going to install the 32-bit a
Andrei Thorp wrote:
Hello there!
Today, I'd like to be all complainy about the AUR search feature. I
haven't really looked around, but are there plans to improve it? Or is
the solution just "use google with site://"?
It seems to be kind of bad at finding stuff. Some examples:
- Can't search by
Listmates,
Couple of thoughts for this day. Latest updates come with the following
praise and questions:
(1) kde4.3 beta 2 (4.2.92svn984151-1) - Wow, much crisper, behaving ...well,
like it should. Even with the radeonhd driver it feels better than (4.2.90 with
fglrx on suse)!
(2) al
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:00 AM, Andrei Thorp wrote:
> Hello there!
>
> Today, I'd like to be all complainy about the AUR search feature. I
> haven't really looked around, but are there plans to improve it? Or is
> the solution just "use google with site://"?
>
> It seems to be kind of bad at find
On Monday 22 June 2009 05:30:20 pm Heinz Mauelshagen wrote:
> David,
>
> you can run "dmraid -an" after closing (e.g. unmounting)
> nvidia_ecaejfdip9, which ain't work now any more, because you already
> deleted the partition. It'll of course not reappear on reboot.
>
> "dmsetup remove nvidia_eca
I have completed to setup my new 64-bit system. This new kernel solved
some slow down in the open source radeonhd grapihcs driver as it is on
par with the open source ati driver... large improvement.
I am now going to install the 32-bit arch version on this machine also.
I have looked into enabl
Excerpts from David C. Rankin's message of Tue Jun 23 16:49:13 -0400 2009:
> On Tuesday 23 June 2009 08:34:53 am Andrei Thorp wrote:
> > > Excellent,
> > >
> > > Two thoughts. (1) delta rpms are great for download size, but
> > > computationally expensive on the client side for reinstalls
Hello there!
Today, I'd like to be all complainy about the AUR search feature. I
haven't really looked around, but are there plans to improve it? Or is
the solution just "use google with site://"?
It seems to be kind of bad at finding stuff. Some examples:
- Can't search by description (well, it
On Tuesday 23 June 2009 08:34:53 am Andrei Thorp wrote:
> > Excellent,
> >
> > Two thoughts. (1) delta rpms are great for download size, but
> > computationally expensive on the client side for reinstalls or multiple
> > machine
> > updates, so (2) if possible, can an option be retained t
> Excellent,
>
> Two thoughts. (1) delta rpms are great for download size, but
> computationally expensive on the client side for reinstalls or multiple
> machine
> updates, so (2) if possible, can an option be retained to enable/disable use
> of
> deltarpms for folks that would like to
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 10:14 +0200, Xavier wrote:
>> The only problem is that you can not always upgrade just one package.
>> Sometimes you also need to upgrade a set of related packages.
>> And in case of big rebuild, that set might be the whol
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 10:14 +0200, Xavier wrote:
> The only problem is that you can not always upgrade just one package.
> Sometimes you also need to upgrade a set of related packages.
> And in case of big rebuild, that set might be the whole testing repo.
>
> As long as you are skilled enough to
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 6:06 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> David C. Rankin wrote:
>>
>> Listmates, Devs:
>>
>> I upgraded to testing to test the new dmraid.
>
> Just my personal opinion here, and perhaps the devs will disagree, but
> personally I wouldn't suggest upgrading your entire box
Xavier schrieb am Dienstag 23 Juni 2009 um 09:47:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 8:50 AM, David C.
>
> Rankin wrote:
> > Excellent,
> >
> >Two thoughts. (1) delta rpms are great for download size, but
> > computationally expensive on the client side for reinstalls or multiple
> > machine updates
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 8:50 AM, David C.
Rankin wrote:
>
> Excellent,
>
> Two thoughts. (1) delta rpms are great for download size, but
> computationally expensive on the client side for reinstalls or multiple
> machine updates, so (2) if possible, can an option be retained to
> enable/d
27 matches
Mail list logo
